Interpretation of TSH and T4 for diagnosing minor alterations in thyroid function: a comparative analysis of two separate longitudinal cohorts.

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Stig Andersen, Jesper Karmisholt, Niels Henrik Bruun, Johannes Riis, Paneeraq Noahsen, Louise Westergaard, Stine Linding Andersen
{"title":"Interpretation of TSH and T4 for diagnosing minor alterations in thyroid function: a comparative analysis of two separate longitudinal cohorts.","authors":"Stig Andersen,&nbsp;Jesper Karmisholt,&nbsp;Niels Henrik Bruun,&nbsp;Johannes Riis,&nbsp;Paneeraq Noahsen,&nbsp;Louise Westergaard,&nbsp;Stine Linding Andersen","doi":"10.1186/s13044-022-00137-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minor alterations in thyroid function are frequent, and interpretation of thyroid function tests in the individual patient can be challenging. Furthermore, the choice of thyroid function test is debatable. To inform the debate, we performed a comparative evaluation of the variation in thyrotropin (TSH) and thyroxine (T4) in two different cohorts to illustrate the precision of TSH and T4 in the diagnosis and monitoring of thyroid dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative analysis of two separate longitudinal studies previously surveyed with monthly blood sampling for one year among 35 subjects. Participants were included based on T4 within the reference range and TSH either within (euthyroid; n = 15) or above (subclinical hypothyroidism; n = 20) the laboratory reference range on two independent blood samplings before inclusion. Exclusion criteria were known thyroid disease or use of thyroid interfering medication. TSH and T4 in individual samples were measured in a single batch to prevent between-batch variation. The distributions TSH and T4 were compared among euthyroid and subclinical hypothyroid individuals, and bootstrap estimates were used to calculate area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Collection of twelve, monthly blood samples in the 35 participants provided 420 samples, and data completeness was 100%. The mean TSH was 1.27/7.19 mIU/L and the mean total T4 was 106/85 nmol/L in euthyroid/subclinical hypothyroid participants. The subclinical hypothyroidism state deviated from the euthyroid by 20% for total T4 and by 466% for TSH. The overlap between the euthyroid and subclinical hypothyroid groups was 92.6% (389/420) for total T4 and 9.0% (38/420) of test results for TSH. The estimated AUC was 0.999 (95%-CI: 0.995; 1.00) for TSH and 0.853 (0.736; 0.935) for total T4. There was no confidence interval overlap between participant groups for TSH while there was a considerable overlap for total T4 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The distributions of thyroid function tests illustrated how TSH outperforms T4 for detecting delicate differences in thyroid function in an individual. Thus, TSH was markedly better than T4 to discriminate between the subtle differences in thyroid function corroborating that TSH is the more sensitive and accurate index of thyroid function status in the individual patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":39048,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549610/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-022-00137-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Minor alterations in thyroid function are frequent, and interpretation of thyroid function tests in the individual patient can be challenging. Furthermore, the choice of thyroid function test is debatable. To inform the debate, we performed a comparative evaluation of the variation in thyrotropin (TSH) and thyroxine (T4) in two different cohorts to illustrate the precision of TSH and T4 in the diagnosis and monitoring of thyroid dysfunction.

Methods: A comparative analysis of two separate longitudinal studies previously surveyed with monthly blood sampling for one year among 35 subjects. Participants were included based on T4 within the reference range and TSH either within (euthyroid; n = 15) or above (subclinical hypothyroidism; n = 20) the laboratory reference range on two independent blood samplings before inclusion. Exclusion criteria were known thyroid disease or use of thyroid interfering medication. TSH and T4 in individual samples were measured in a single batch to prevent between-batch variation. The distributions TSH and T4 were compared among euthyroid and subclinical hypothyroid individuals, and bootstrap estimates were used to calculate area under the curve (AUC).

Results: Collection of twelve, monthly blood samples in the 35 participants provided 420 samples, and data completeness was 100%. The mean TSH was 1.27/7.19 mIU/L and the mean total T4 was 106/85 nmol/L in euthyroid/subclinical hypothyroid participants. The subclinical hypothyroidism state deviated from the euthyroid by 20% for total T4 and by 466% for TSH. The overlap between the euthyroid and subclinical hypothyroid groups was 92.6% (389/420) for total T4 and 9.0% (38/420) of test results for TSH. The estimated AUC was 0.999 (95%-CI: 0.995; 1.00) for TSH and 0.853 (0.736; 0.935) for total T4. There was no confidence interval overlap between participant groups for TSH while there was a considerable overlap for total T4 (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The distributions of thyroid function tests illustrated how TSH outperforms T4 for detecting delicate differences in thyroid function in an individual. Thus, TSH was markedly better than T4 to discriminate between the subtle differences in thyroid function corroborating that TSH is the more sensitive and accurate index of thyroid function status in the individual patient.

Abstract Image

TSH和T4诊断甲状腺功能轻微改变的解释:两个独立纵向队列的比较分析。
背景:甲状腺功能的轻微改变是常见的,个体患者甲状腺功能检查的解释可能具有挑战性。此外,甲状腺功能检查的选择是有争议的。为了为争论提供信息,我们对两个不同队列中促甲状腺激素(TSH)和甲状腺素(T4)的变化进行了比较评估,以说明TSH和T4在甲状腺功能障碍诊断和监测中的准确性。方法:对两项独立的纵向研究进行比较分析,先前对35名受试者进行了为期一年的每月血液采样调查。参与者根据T4在参考范围内,TSH在(甲状腺功能正常;N = 15)或以上(亚临床甲状腺功能减退;N = 20)纳入前两份独立血样的实验室参考范围。排除标准为已知甲状腺疾病或使用甲状腺干扰药物。单个样品中的TSH和T4在单个批次中测量,以防止批次之间的变化。比较甲状腺功能正常者和亚临床甲状腺功能减退者TSH和T4的分布,采用bootstrap估计法计算曲线下面积(area under The curve, AUC)。结果:35名参与者每月采集12份血样,提供420份样本,数据完整性为100%。甲状腺功能正常/亚临床甲状腺功能减退患者平均TSH为1.27/7.19 mIU/L,平均总T4为106/85 nmol/L。亚临床甲状腺功能减退状态偏离甲状腺正常状态的总T4为20%,TSH为466%。甲状腺功能正常组与亚临床甲状腺功能减退组总T4重叠92.6% (389/420),TSH重叠9.0%(38/420)。估计AUC为0.999 (95% ci: 0.995;1.00), 0.853 (0.736;总T4为0.935)。参与者组间TSH的置信区间没有重叠,而总T4的置信区间有相当大的重叠(p)结论:甲状腺功能测试的分布说明了TSH在检测个体甲状腺功能的微妙差异方面如何优于T4。因此,TSH在区分甲状腺功能细微差异方面明显优于T4,证实TSH是个体患者甲状腺功能状态更敏感和准确的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thyroid Research
Thyroid Research Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信