Dentists' Perceptions of Personal Infection Control Measurements in Response to COVID-19.

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
JDR Clinical & Translational Research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-07 DOI:10.1177/23800844221123751
E O Beltrán, J T Newton, V Avila, N B Pitts, J E Castellanos, L M A Tenuta, S Martignon
{"title":"Dentists' Perceptions of Personal Infection Control Measurements in Response to COVID-19.","authors":"E O Beltrán, J T Newton, V Avila, N B Pitts, J E Castellanos, L M A Tenuta, S Martignon","doi":"10.1177/23800844221123751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore through focus groups (FGs) the perceptions of dental practitioners (DPs) from different countries of the challenges of implementing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related biosafety measures, especially personal protection equipment (PPE), during the COVID-19 pandemic period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DPs from Colombia, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States were invited to participate in country-based FGs. These were facilitated by an experienced moderator who explored the factors that guided the implementation of COVID-19 related biosafety measures and PPE use. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis on the basis of categories defined by the researchers deductively and inductively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 DPs participated in 3 FGs (Colombia:<i>n</i> = 8; United Kingdom: <i>n</i> = 7; United States: <i>n</i> = 9) and 1 in an in-depth interview (Germany). DPs described using several processes to judge which guidance document to adopt and which aspects of the guidance were important in their practice. These included making judgments concerning the views of any indemnity organization to which the DPs were responsible, the staff's views in the practice, and the views of patients. In the absence of a single overarching guidance document, DPs filtered the available information through several considerations to find a level of PPE that they deemed \"implementable\" in local practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that the implementation of evidence-based practice is subject to modification through a lens of what is \"feasible\" in practice.</p><p><strong>Knowledge transfer statement: </strong>Clinicians, educators, and policy makers can use the results of this study to understand the process through which guidance is transformed into implementable patient care pathways in the dental practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14783,"journal":{"name":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","volume":" ","pages":"21-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9548485/pdf/10.1177_23800844221123751.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844221123751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore through focus groups (FGs) the perceptions of dental practitioners (DPs) from different countries of the challenges of implementing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related biosafety measures, especially personal protection equipment (PPE), during the COVID-19 pandemic period.

Methods: DPs from Colombia, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States were invited to participate in country-based FGs. These were facilitated by an experienced moderator who explored the factors that guided the implementation of COVID-19 related biosafety measures and PPE use. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis on the basis of categories defined by the researchers deductively and inductively.

Results: A total of 25 DPs participated in 3 FGs (Colombia:n = 8; United Kingdom: n = 7; United States: n = 9) and 1 in an in-depth interview (Germany). DPs described using several processes to judge which guidance document to adopt and which aspects of the guidance were important in their practice. These included making judgments concerning the views of any indemnity organization to which the DPs were responsible, the staff's views in the practice, and the views of patients. In the absence of a single overarching guidance document, DPs filtered the available information through several considerations to find a level of PPE that they deemed "implementable" in local practice.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that the implementation of evidence-based practice is subject to modification through a lens of what is "feasible" in practice.

Knowledge transfer statement: Clinicians, educators, and policy makers can use the results of this study to understand the process through which guidance is transformed into implementable patient care pathways in the dental practice.

牙医对 COVID-19 个人感染控制措施的看法。
目的通过焦点小组(FGs)探讨不同国家的牙科医生(DPs)对在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施与 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关的生物安全措施,尤其是个人防护设备(PPE)所面临挑战的看法:方法:哥伦比亚、德国、英国和美国的指定人员应邀参加了基于国家的论坛小组。由一名经验丰富的主持人主持,探讨指导实施 COVID-19 相关生物安全措施和使用个人防护设备的因素。在研究人员定义的类别基础上,通过专题分析对数据进行了演绎和归纳:共有 25 名专业人员参加了 3 次专题小组讨论(哥伦比亚:n = 8;英国:n = 7;美国:n = 9)和 1 次深入访谈(德国)。民主党人描述了在判断采用哪份指导文件以及指导文件的哪些方面对其实践具有重要意义时所采用的几种程序。其中包括对其负责的赔偿组织的意见、诊所员工的意见以及患者的意见做出判断。在缺乏单一的总体指导文件的情况下,医疗服务提供者通过多个考虑因素对现有信息进行筛选,以找到他们认为在当地实践中 "可实施 "的个人防护措施水平:结论:研究结果表明,循证实践的实施需要根据实践中的 "可行性 "进行调整:临床医生、教育工作者和政策制定者可以利用本研究的结果来了解指导意见在牙科实践中转化为可实施的患者护理路径的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDR Clinical & Translational Research
JDR Clinical & Translational Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: JDR Clinical & Translational Research seeks to publish the highest quality research articles on clinical and translational research including all of the dental specialties and implantology. Examples include behavioral sciences, cariology, oral & pharyngeal cancer, disease diagnostics, evidence based health care delivery, human genetics, health services research, periodontal diseases, oral medicine, radiology, and pathology. The JDR Clinical & Translational Research expands on its research content by including high-impact health care and global oral health policy statements and systematic reviews of clinical concepts affecting clinical practice. Unique to the JDR Clinical & Translational Research are advances in clinical and translational medicine articles created to focus on research with an immediate potential to affect clinical therapy outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信