A point-of-care dot blot ELISA assay for detection of protective antibody against canine adenovirus, canine parvovirus, and canine distemper virus is diagnostically accurate.

Azizeh Egerer, Zoie Schaefer, Laurie Larson
{"title":"A point-of-care dot blot ELISA assay for detection of protective antibody against canine adenovirus, canine parvovirus, and canine distemper virus is diagnostically accurate.","authors":"Azizeh Egerer,&nbsp;Zoie Schaefer,&nbsp;Laurie Larson","doi":"10.2460/javma.22.05.0224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine diagnostic accuracy of a point-of-care antibody-screening test by determining sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy when compared to reference standard tests for antibody against core vaccine viruses canine adenovirus (CAV), canine parvovirus (CPV), and canine distemper virus (CDV). A further aim was to provide the practitioner with information to guide selection of vaccinal antibody testing methods.</p><p><strong>Samples: </strong>Canine sera from across North America were submitted to a fee-for-service titer-testing laboratory. Samples came from healthy pet dogs with known core vaccination history (n = 431) as well as unvaccinated dogs held in isolation (132). This study examined a total of 563 samples for CDV/CPV and 183 for CAV.</p><p><strong>Procedures: </strong>Serum virus neutralization assays determined antibody titers for CDV and CAV. Hemagglutination inhibition assay determined antibody titers against CPV. All sera were also tested by point-of-care dot blot ELISA (index test).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all 3 viral antigens, the index test provided sensitivity ranging from 96.03% to 96.75% and specificity ranging from 87.50% to 94.33%. Overall accuracy ranged from 93.43% to 95.91%.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The index test correlates well with reference standard tests and is a reliable, rapid screening test for detection of protective vaccinal antibody against CAV, CDV, and CPV in healthy dogs over 20 weeks of age. An accurate assessment of immunity allows clinicians to administer core vaccines appropriately as needed, avoiding unnecessary risk of adverse vaccine events.</p>","PeriodicalId":514111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1928-1933"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.22.05.0224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: To determine diagnostic accuracy of a point-of-care antibody-screening test by determining sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy when compared to reference standard tests for antibody against core vaccine viruses canine adenovirus (CAV), canine parvovirus (CPV), and canine distemper virus (CDV). A further aim was to provide the practitioner with information to guide selection of vaccinal antibody testing methods.

Samples: Canine sera from across North America were submitted to a fee-for-service titer-testing laboratory. Samples came from healthy pet dogs with known core vaccination history (n = 431) as well as unvaccinated dogs held in isolation (132). This study examined a total of 563 samples for CDV/CPV and 183 for CAV.

Procedures: Serum virus neutralization assays determined antibody titers for CDV and CAV. Hemagglutination inhibition assay determined antibody titers against CPV. All sera were also tested by point-of-care dot blot ELISA (index test).

Results: For all 3 viral antigens, the index test provided sensitivity ranging from 96.03% to 96.75% and specificity ranging from 87.50% to 94.33%. Overall accuracy ranged from 93.43% to 95.91%.

Clinical relevance: The index test correlates well with reference standard tests and is a reliable, rapid screening test for detection of protective vaccinal antibody against CAV, CDV, and CPV in healthy dogs over 20 weeks of age. An accurate assessment of immunity allows clinicians to administer core vaccines appropriately as needed, avoiding unnecessary risk of adverse vaccine events.

点护理点印迹ELISA法检测犬腺病毒、犬细小病毒和犬瘟热病毒的保护性抗体诊断准确。
目的:通过检测针对核心疫苗病毒犬腺病毒(CAV)、犬细小病毒(CPV)和犬瘟热病毒(CDV)抗体的参考标准试验的敏感性、特异性和总体准确性,确定定点抗体筛选试验诊断的准确性。进一步的目的是为从业者提供信息,指导选择疫苗抗体检测方法。样本:来自北美各地的犬血清被提交到一个收费服务的滴度检测实验室。样本来自已知核心疫苗接种史的健康宠物狗(n = 431)以及隔离的未接种疫苗的狗(132)。本研究共检测了563份CDV/CPV样本和183份CAV样本。方法:血清病毒中和试验测定CDV和CAV抗体滴度。血凝抑制试验测定抗CPV抗体滴度。所有血清均采用点护理点印迹ELISA(指数试验)检测。结果:3种病毒抗原的敏感性为96.03% ~ 96.75%,特异性为87.50% ~ 94.33%。总体准确度为93.43% ~ 95.91%。临床相关性:该指标试验与参考标准试验具有良好的相关性,是检测20周龄以上健康犬抗CAV、CDV和CPV保护性疫苗抗体的可靠、快速筛选试验。准确的免疫评估使临床医生能够根据需要适当地接种核心疫苗,避免不必要的疫苗不良事件风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书