Predictive factors of nebulized morphine failure in North-African patients with chest trauma: a prospective pilot study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-05 DOI:10.1080/17476348.2022.2131543
Hela Attia, Helmi Ben Saad, Karim Masmoudi, Imen Bannour, Mouna Ouaz, Kais Gardabbou, Ali Majdoub
{"title":"Predictive factors of nebulized morphine failure in North-African patients with chest trauma: a prospective pilot study.","authors":"Hela Attia,&nbsp;Helmi Ben Saad,&nbsp;Karim Masmoudi,&nbsp;Imen Bannour,&nbsp;Mouna Ouaz,&nbsp;Kais Gardabbou,&nbsp;Ali Majdoub","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2022.2131543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the predictive factors of nebulized morphine (nMOR) failure in patients with chest trauma.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This was an interventional clinical study. Patients admitted with isolated chest trauma with a pain visual analog score > 4 were included. Each patient received 10 mg nMOR. If pain was still > 4 after 10 minutes of nebulization, the latter was repeated every 10 minutes until pain was relieved (i.e. ≤ 4). If pain was > 4 at 30 minutes, nMOR was considered a failure. Patients were divided into two groups: MOR (+) and MOR (-) (good response to and nMOR failure, respectively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five patients were included. Analysis of the risk factors revealed that road traffic accidents (relative risk (RR): 0.117 [0.031-0.443]; p = 0.002), number of fractured ribs > 4 (RR: 0.317 [0.092-0.543]; p = 0.006), bilateral injury (RR: 0.114 [0.037-0.349]; p < 0.001), flail chest (RR: 0.120 [0.037-0.386]; p < 0.001), hemothorax (RR: 0.203 [0.062-0.660]; p = 0.008), pulmonary contusion (RR: 0.202 [0.069-0.589]; p = 0.003), and pain at admission > 7 (RR: 0.363 [0.147-0.579]; p = 0.004) were predictors of nMOR failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results can help optimize the analgesic management of chest trauma patients by identifying the most eligible patients to benefit from nMOR.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT03580187.</p>","PeriodicalId":12103,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2022.2131543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To determine the predictive factors of nebulized morphine (nMOR) failure in patients with chest trauma.

Research design and methods: This was an interventional clinical study. Patients admitted with isolated chest trauma with a pain visual analog score > 4 were included. Each patient received 10 mg nMOR. If pain was still > 4 after 10 minutes of nebulization, the latter was repeated every 10 minutes until pain was relieved (i.e. ≤ 4). If pain was > 4 at 30 minutes, nMOR was considered a failure. Patients were divided into two groups: MOR (+) and MOR (-) (good response to and nMOR failure, respectively).

Results: Seventy-five patients were included. Analysis of the risk factors revealed that road traffic accidents (relative risk (RR): 0.117 [0.031-0.443]; p = 0.002), number of fractured ribs > 4 (RR: 0.317 [0.092-0.543]; p = 0.006), bilateral injury (RR: 0.114 [0.037-0.349]; p < 0.001), flail chest (RR: 0.120 [0.037-0.386]; p < 0.001), hemothorax (RR: 0.203 [0.062-0.660]; p = 0.008), pulmonary contusion (RR: 0.202 [0.069-0.589]; p = 0.003), and pain at admission > 7 (RR: 0.363 [0.147-0.579]; p = 0.004) were predictors of nMOR failure.

Conclusion: Our results can help optimize the analgesic management of chest trauma patients by identifying the most eligible patients to benefit from nMOR.

Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT03580187.

北非胸外伤患者吗啡雾化失效的预测因素:一项前瞻性试点研究。
目的:探讨胸外伤患者雾化吗啡(nMOR)失效的预测因素。研究设计与方法:本研究为介入性临床研究。纳入了疼痛视觉模拟评分> 4的孤立性胸部创伤患者。每例患者接受10 mg nMOR治疗。如果在雾化10分钟后疼痛仍然> 4,则每10分钟重复一次,直到疼痛缓解(即≤4)。如果在30分钟时疼痛> 4,则认为nMOR失败。患者分为MOR(+)组和MOR(-)组(分别为反应良好组和nMOR失败组)。结果:纳入75例患者。危险因素分析表明:道路交通事故相对危险度(RR): 0.117 [0.031-0.443];p = 0.002),骨折肋骨数> 4 (RR: 0.317 [0.092-0.543];p = 0.006),双侧损伤(RR: 0.114 [0.037-0.349];p 7 (RR: 0.363 [0.147-0.579];p = 0.004)是nMOR失败的预测因子。结论:我们的研究结果可以通过确定最适合从nMOR中获益的患者来帮助优化胸部创伤患者的镇痛管理。临床试验注册:www.clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT03580187。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Coverage will include the following key areas: - Prospects for new and emerging therapeutics - Epidemiology of disease - Preventive strategies - All aspects of COPD, from patient self-management to systemic effects of the disease and comorbidities - Improved diagnostic methods, including imaging techniques, biomarkers and physiological tests. - Advances in the treatment of respiratory infections and drug resistance issues - Occupational and environmental factors - Progress in smoking intervention and cessation methods - Disease and treatment issues for defined populations, such as children and the elderly - Respiratory intensive and critical care - Updates on the status and advances of specific disease areas, including asthma, HIV/AIDS-related disease, cystic fibrosis, COPD and sleep-disordered breathing morbidity
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信