Hela Attia, Helmi Ben Saad, Karim Masmoudi, Imen Bannour, Mouna Ouaz, Kais Gardabbou, Ali Majdoub
{"title":"Predictive factors of nebulized morphine failure in North-African patients with chest trauma: a prospective pilot study.","authors":"Hela Attia, Helmi Ben Saad, Karim Masmoudi, Imen Bannour, Mouna Ouaz, Kais Gardabbou, Ali Majdoub","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2022.2131543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the predictive factors of nebulized morphine (nMOR) failure in patients with chest trauma.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This was an interventional clinical study. Patients admitted with isolated chest trauma with a pain visual analog score > 4 were included. Each patient received 10 mg nMOR. If pain was still > 4 after 10 minutes of nebulization, the latter was repeated every 10 minutes until pain was relieved (i.e. ≤ 4). If pain was > 4 at 30 minutes, nMOR was considered a failure. Patients were divided into two groups: MOR (+) and MOR (-) (good response to and nMOR failure, respectively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five patients were included. Analysis of the risk factors revealed that road traffic accidents (relative risk (RR): 0.117 [0.031-0.443]; p = 0.002), number of fractured ribs > 4 (RR: 0.317 [0.092-0.543]; p = 0.006), bilateral injury (RR: 0.114 [0.037-0.349]; p < 0.001), flail chest (RR: 0.120 [0.037-0.386]; p < 0.001), hemothorax (RR: 0.203 [0.062-0.660]; p = 0.008), pulmonary contusion (RR: 0.202 [0.069-0.589]; p = 0.003), and pain at admission > 7 (RR: 0.363 [0.147-0.579]; p = 0.004) were predictors of nMOR failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results can help optimize the analgesic management of chest trauma patients by identifying the most eligible patients to benefit from nMOR.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT03580187.</p>","PeriodicalId":12103,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine","volume":"16 10","pages":"1085-1092"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2022.2131543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective: To determine the predictive factors of nebulized morphine (nMOR) failure in patients with chest trauma.
Research design and methods: This was an interventional clinical study. Patients admitted with isolated chest trauma with a pain visual analog score > 4 were included. Each patient received 10 mg nMOR. If pain was still > 4 after 10 minutes of nebulization, the latter was repeated every 10 minutes until pain was relieved (i.e. ≤ 4). If pain was > 4 at 30 minutes, nMOR was considered a failure. Patients were divided into two groups: MOR (+) and MOR (-) (good response to and nMOR failure, respectively).
Results: Seventy-five patients were included. Analysis of the risk factors revealed that road traffic accidents (relative risk (RR): 0.117 [0.031-0.443]; p = 0.002), number of fractured ribs > 4 (RR: 0.317 [0.092-0.543]; p = 0.006), bilateral injury (RR: 0.114 [0.037-0.349]; p < 0.001), flail chest (RR: 0.120 [0.037-0.386]; p < 0.001), hemothorax (RR: 0.203 [0.062-0.660]; p = 0.008), pulmonary contusion (RR: 0.202 [0.069-0.589]; p = 0.003), and pain at admission > 7 (RR: 0.363 [0.147-0.579]; p = 0.004) were predictors of nMOR failure.
Conclusion: Our results can help optimize the analgesic management of chest trauma patients by identifying the most eligible patients to benefit from nMOR.
Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT03580187.
期刊介绍:
Coverage will include the following key areas:
- Prospects for new and emerging therapeutics
- Epidemiology of disease
- Preventive strategies
- All aspects of COPD, from patient self-management to systemic effects of the disease and comorbidities
- Improved diagnostic methods, including imaging techniques, biomarkers and physiological tests.
- Advances in the treatment of respiratory infections and drug resistance issues
- Occupational and environmental factors
- Progress in smoking intervention and cessation methods
- Disease and treatment issues for defined populations, such as children and the elderly
- Respiratory intensive and critical care
- Updates on the status and advances of specific disease areas, including asthma, HIV/AIDS-related disease, cystic fibrosis, COPD and sleep-disordered breathing morbidity