Change in hospitalization rates following transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion.

Moghniuddin Mohammed, Sharma Kattel, Irfan Ahsan, Abdul J Samdani, Swati Chand, Devesh Rai, Dhrubajyoti Bandyopadhyay, Sagar Ranka, Amit Noheria, Sanjaya K Gupta, Seth H Sheldon, Mohan Rao, Wilbert S Aronow, James V Freeman, Madhu Reddy
{"title":"Change in hospitalization rates following transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion.","authors":"Moghniuddin Mohammed,&nbsp;Sharma Kattel,&nbsp;Irfan Ahsan,&nbsp;Abdul J Samdani,&nbsp;Swati Chand,&nbsp;Devesh Rai,&nbsp;Dhrubajyoti Bandyopadhyay,&nbsp;Sagar Ranka,&nbsp;Amit Noheria,&nbsp;Sanjaya K Gupta,&nbsp;Seth H Sheldon,&nbsp;Mohan Rao,&nbsp;Wilbert S Aronow,&nbsp;James V Freeman,&nbsp;Madhu Reddy","doi":"10.5114/amsad.2021.111405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is recommended in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who have contraindications to or are intolerant of long-term oral anticoagulants (OAC), but its impact on hospitalization rates has not been well described. The objective of our study is to describe the incidence of all-cause, bleeding-related, and thrombosis-related hospitalizations before and after LAAO. Material and methods We used the Nationwide Readmission Database to include patients aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of AF who underwent transcatheter LAAO during the months of February-November in each year between 2016 and 2018. Patients who died during the index procedure or had missing length of hospital stay or mortality information were excluded. Results A total of 27,633 patients were included (median age: 77 years, 41% female) with an average pre- and post-LAAO monitoring period of 6.5 and 5.5 months respectively. Of these, 10,808 (39.1%) patients had one or more admissions prior to the procedure compared to 7,196 (26.0%) after the procedure. There was a 26% reduction in incidence of all-cause admissions (rate ratio (RR) = 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71–0.76; p < 0.001), 49% reduction in bleeding-related admissions (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.48–0.55; p < 0.001), and 71% reduction in thrombosis-related readmissions (RR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.26–0.33; p < 0.001) after LAAO. Conclusions In a contemporary, nationally representative dataset, we found that LAAO is associated with a significant decrease in all-cause, bleeding-related, and thrombosis-related admissions. These findings lend support to the current use of transcatheter LAAO in clinical practice for patients with contraindications to OAC and/or at high risk of bleeding.","PeriodicalId":8317,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c5/df/AMS-AD-6-141817.PMC9487831.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/amsad.2021.111405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is recommended in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who have contraindications to or are intolerant of long-term oral anticoagulants (OAC), but its impact on hospitalization rates has not been well described. The objective of our study is to describe the incidence of all-cause, bleeding-related, and thrombosis-related hospitalizations before and after LAAO. Material and methods We used the Nationwide Readmission Database to include patients aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of AF who underwent transcatheter LAAO during the months of February-November in each year between 2016 and 2018. Patients who died during the index procedure or had missing length of hospital stay or mortality information were excluded. Results A total of 27,633 patients were included (median age: 77 years, 41% female) with an average pre- and post-LAAO monitoring period of 6.5 and 5.5 months respectively. Of these, 10,808 (39.1%) patients had one or more admissions prior to the procedure compared to 7,196 (26.0%) after the procedure. There was a 26% reduction in incidence of all-cause admissions (rate ratio (RR) = 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71–0.76; p < 0.001), 49% reduction in bleeding-related admissions (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.48–0.55; p < 0.001), and 71% reduction in thrombosis-related readmissions (RR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.26–0.33; p < 0.001) after LAAO. Conclusions In a contemporary, nationally representative dataset, we found that LAAO is associated with a significant decrease in all-cause, bleeding-related, and thrombosis-related admissions. These findings lend support to the current use of transcatheter LAAO in clinical practice for patients with contraindications to OAC and/or at high risk of bleeding.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经导管左心耳闭塞后住院率的变化。
左心耳闭塞(LAAO)被推荐用于有禁忌症或不耐受长期口服抗凝剂(OAC)的非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)患者,但其对住院率的影响尚未得到很好的描述。我们研究的目的是描述LAAO前后全因、出血相关和血栓相关住院的发生率。材料和方法:我们使用全国再入院数据库纳入了年龄≥18岁、诊断为房颤且在2016年至2018年每年2月至11月接受经导管LAAO的患者。在索引程序中死亡或缺少住院时间或死亡率信息的患者被排除在外。结果:共纳入27,633例患者(中位年龄:77岁,女性41%),laao前后平均监测时间分别为6.5个月和5.5个月。其中,10,808例(39.1%)患者在手术前有一次或多次入院,而手术后有7,196例(26.0%)。全因入院发生率降低26% (RR = 0.74, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.71-0.76;p < 0.001),出血相关入院减少49% (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.48-0.55;p < 0.001),血栓相关再入院减少71% (RR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.26-0.33;p < 0.001)。结论:在当代具有全国代表性的数据集中,我们发现LAAO与全因、出血相关和血栓相关入院的显著减少有关。这些发现支持了目前在临床实践中对OAC禁忌症和/或出血高风险患者使用经导管LAAO的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信