Effects of Meaningful Action Observation Therapy on Occupational Performance, Upper Limb Function, and Corticospinal Excitability Poststroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Neural Plasticity Pub Date : 2022-09-16 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/5284044
Aryan Shamili, Afsoon Hassani Mehraban, Akram Azad, Gholam Reza Raissi, Mohsen Shati
{"title":"Effects of Meaningful Action Observation Therapy on Occupational Performance, Upper Limb Function, and Corticospinal Excitability Poststroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial.","authors":"Aryan Shamili, Afsoon Hassani Mehraban, Akram Azad, Gholam Reza Raissi, Mohsen Shati","doi":"10.1155/2022/5284044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Action observation therapy (AOT) is a mirror neuron-based approach that has been recently used in poststroke rehabilitation. The main goal of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of AOT of occupations and tasks that are meaningful for chronic stroke patients on occupational performance, upper-extremity function, and corticospinal changes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A randomized control trial was designed to compare between experimental (<i>n</i> = 13) and control groups (<i>n</i> = 14). In both groups, the execution of meaningful tasks was practiced, but the videos of those tasks were just shown to the experiment group. Instead, patients in the control group watched nature videos as a placebo. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Box-Block Test (BBT) on 3 occasions: baseline, post (at 4 weeks), and follow-up (at 8 weeks). The assessments of central motor conduction time (CMCT) for abductor policis brevis (APB) and extensor indicis (EI) were only recorded at baseline and posttreatment. Both assessors of clinical and neurophysiological outcomes were blinded to the allocation of subjects.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Finally, the results of outcomes in 24 patients who completed the study were analyzed. In both groups, significant improvements after treatment were seen for most outcomes (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). These changes were persistent until follow-up. There were significant differences in COPM performance (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and satisfaction (<i>p</i> = 0.001) between the experimental and control groups. In contrast, other clinical assessments such as FMA, ARAT, and BBT did not show significant differences between the two treatments (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.05). The results of CMCT related to APB showed a more significant change in the experiment group compared to the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.022). There was no difference in change detected between the two groups for CMCT related to EI after treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Observation and execution of meaningful activities can enhance the effects of simply practicing those activities on occupational performance/satisfaction and corticospinal excitability poststroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":19122,"journal":{"name":"Neural Plasticity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9507745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Plasticity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5284044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Action observation therapy (AOT) is a mirror neuron-based approach that has been recently used in poststroke rehabilitation. The main goal of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of AOT of occupations and tasks that are meaningful for chronic stroke patients on occupational performance, upper-extremity function, and corticospinal changes.

Method: A randomized control trial was designed to compare between experimental (n = 13) and control groups (n = 14). In both groups, the execution of meaningful tasks was practiced, but the videos of those tasks were just shown to the experiment group. Instead, patients in the control group watched nature videos as a placebo. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Box-Block Test (BBT) on 3 occasions: baseline, post (at 4 weeks), and follow-up (at 8 weeks). The assessments of central motor conduction time (CMCT) for abductor policis brevis (APB) and extensor indicis (EI) were only recorded at baseline and posttreatment. Both assessors of clinical and neurophysiological outcomes were blinded to the allocation of subjects.

Result: Finally, the results of outcomes in 24 patients who completed the study were analyzed. In both groups, significant improvements after treatment were seen for most outcomes (p ≤ 0.05). These changes were persistent until follow-up. There were significant differences in COPM performance (p = 0.03) and satisfaction (p = 0.001) between the experimental and control groups. In contrast, other clinical assessments such as FMA, ARAT, and BBT did not show significant differences between the two treatments (p ≥ 0.05). The results of CMCT related to APB showed a more significant change in the experiment group compared to the control group (p = 0.022). There was no difference in change detected between the two groups for CMCT related to EI after treatments.

Conclusion: Observation and execution of meaningful activities can enhance the effects of simply practicing those activities on occupational performance/satisfaction and corticospinal excitability poststroke.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

有意义的动作观察疗法对脑卒中后职业表现、上肢功能和皮质脊髓兴奋性的影响:双盲随机对照试验》。
简介行动观察疗法(AOT)是一种基于镜像神经元的方法,最近被用于脑卒中后康复。本研究的主要目的是调查对慢性中风患者有意义的职业和任务的行动观察疗法对职业表现、上肢功能和皮质脊髓变化的有效性:设计了一项随机对照试验,比较实验组(n = 13)和对照组(n = 14)。两组患者都进行了有意义任务的执行练习,但实验组只播放了这些任务的视频。而对照组的患者则观看自然视频作为安慰剂。临床结果通过加拿大职业表现测量法(COPM)、福格尔-迈耶评估法(FMA)、行动研究手臂测试法(ARAT)和箱形块测试法(BBT)进行评估,评估分三次进行:基线、后期(4 周)和随访(8 周)。外展肌(APB)和内收肌(EI)的中枢运动传导时间(CMCT)评估仅在基线和治疗后进行记录。临床和神经电生理结果的评估人员对受试者的分配均为盲人:最后,对完成研究的 24 名患者的结果进行了分析。在两组患者中,大多数结果在治疗后都有明显改善(P ≤ 0.05)。这些变化一直持续到随访。实验组和对照组在 COPM 表现(p = 0.03)和满意度(p = 0.001)方面存在明显差异。相比之下,其他临床评估如 FMA、ARAT 和 BBT 在两种治疗方法之间没有显示出显著差异(p ≥ 0.05)。与 APB 相关的 CMCT 结果显示,实验组与对照组相比变化更显著(p = 0.022)。结论:结论:观察和执行有意义的活动可以增强简单练习这些活动对脑卒中后职业表现/满意度和皮质脊髓兴奋性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neural Plasticity
Neural Plasticity Neuroscience-Neurology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Neural Plasticity is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles related to all aspects of neural plasticity, with special emphasis on its functional significance as reflected in behavior and in psychopathology. Neural Plasticity publishes research and review articles from the entire range of relevant disciplines, including basic neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, biological psychology, and biological psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信