Review of the effects of polycystic ovary syndrome on Cognition: Looking beyond the androgen hypothesis

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Mateja Perović , Katrina Wugalter , Gillian Einstein
{"title":"Review of the effects of polycystic ovary syndrome on Cognition: Looking beyond the androgen hypothesis","authors":"Mateja Perović ,&nbsp;Katrina Wugalter ,&nbsp;Gillian Einstein","doi":"10.1016/j.yfrne.2022.101038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Polycystic-ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder affecting women of reproductive age, and many features associated with PCOS – such as elevated androgens, insulin resistance and inflammation – are known to affect cognition. However, effects of PCOS on cognition are not well-understood. Here we review the current literature on PCOS and cognition, note the extent of PCOS symptomatology studied in relation to cognitive outcomes, and identify key research gaps and common methodological concerns. Findings indicate a pattern of worse performance across cognitive domains and brain measures in women with PCOS relative to non-PCOS controls, as well as a lack of evidence for the common assumption that women with PCOS will have higher performance on tasks with a demonstrated male-advantage due to high testosterone levels. We suggest strategies for moving beyond the focus on elevated androgens, in favor of research practices that account for the nuances and heterogeneity of PCOS symptoms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12469,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 101038"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091302222000619","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Polycystic-ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder affecting women of reproductive age, and many features associated with PCOS – such as elevated androgens, insulin resistance and inflammation – are known to affect cognition. However, effects of PCOS on cognition are not well-understood. Here we review the current literature on PCOS and cognition, note the extent of PCOS symptomatology studied in relation to cognitive outcomes, and identify key research gaps and common methodological concerns. Findings indicate a pattern of worse performance across cognitive domains and brain measures in women with PCOS relative to non-PCOS controls, as well as a lack of evidence for the common assumption that women with PCOS will have higher performance on tasks with a demonstrated male-advantage due to high testosterone levels. We suggest strategies for moving beyond the focus on elevated androgens, in favor of research practices that account for the nuances and heterogeneity of PCOS symptoms.

多囊卵巢综合征对认知的影响综述:超越雄激素假说
多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是影响育龄妇女最常见的内分泌紊乱,许多与多囊卵巢综合征相关的特征-如雄激素升高,胰岛素抵抗和炎症-已知会影响认知。然而,多囊卵巢综合征对认知的影响尚不清楚。在这里,我们回顾了目前关于多囊卵巢综合征和认知的文献,注意到多囊卵巢综合征症状学与认知结果的研究程度,并确定了关键的研究差距和常见的方法问题。研究结果表明,与非多囊卵巢综合征对照组相比,多囊卵巢综合征女性在认知领域和大脑测量方面的表现更差,而且缺乏证据证明,由于睾酮水平高,多囊卵巢综合征女性在具有男性优势的任务中表现更好。我们建议的策略是超越对雄激素升高的关注,支持考虑多囊卵巢综合征症状的细微差别和异质性的研究实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
6.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology (FIN) publishes a wide range of informative articles including comprehensive reviews, systematic reviews, opinion pieces, and meta-analyses. While the majority of reviews are invited, we also embrace unsolicited reviews and meta-analyses, as well as proposals for thematic special issues, provided they meet our rigorous quality standards. In addition, we encourage authors to submit commentaries that concisely present fresh ideas or offer further analysis to delve deeper into the implications of an article published in our journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信