Convergence and Divergence in Canadian Ethics Support Services.

Q3 Medicine

Journal of Clinical Ethics Pub Date : 2022-01-01

Marika Warren, Christy Simpson, Diane Godkin, Allen Alvarez, Amanda Porter

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses clinical ethics consultation (CEC), and thereby ethics support services in the Canadian context. Commonalities and differences between the three models of ethics support and CEC shared in this article are identified, set within the broader context of the Canadian healthcare system, accreditation, and professionalization of practicing healthcare ethicists.

本刊更多论文

加拿大伦理支持服务的趋同与分歧。

本文讨论临床伦理咨询(CEC)，从而在加拿大的背景下伦理支持服务。本文中分享的三种伦理支持和CEC模式之间的共同点和差异，在加拿大医疗保健系统、认证和执业医疗保健伦理学家专业化的更广泛背景下进行了确定。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Clinical Ethics Medicine-Medicine (all)

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Clinical Ethics is written for and by physicians, nurses, attorneys, clergy, ethicists, and others whose decisions directly affect patients. More than 70 percent of the articles are authored or co-authored by physicians. JCE is a double-blinded, peer-reviewed journal indexed in PubMed, Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, the Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, and other indexes.