Artistic and Health Professionals' Perceptions of Training Load Practices in Pre-Professional and Professional Ballet and Contemporary Dance: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Dance Medicine & Science Pub Date : 2022-12-15 Epub Date: 2022-09-15 DOI:10.12678/1089-313X.121522d
Melanie Fuller, Gene M Moyle, Carly Harrison, Geoffrey M Minett
{"title":"Artistic and Health Professionals' Perceptions of Training Load Practices in Pre-Professional and Professional Ballet and Contemporary Dance: A Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Melanie Fuller,&nbsp;Gene M Moyle,&nbsp;Carly Harrison,&nbsp;Geoffrey M Minett","doi":"10.12678/1089-313X.121522d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of training load practices of dance artistic and health professionals. Artistic staff and health professionals with experience in dance were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey study relating to training load practices in pre-professional and professional, ballet and contemporary dance. The survey was developed from previous investigations in soccer and consisted of multiple-choice, Likert scale, and free-text responses. Responses to closed questions were reported by percentage and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Thematic analysis was performed by two independent assessors of free-text responses. There were six artistic staff and 18 health professional participants. Artistic staff were perceived to be \"mostly/completely responsible\" for planning training (artistic staff: 100%, 95% CI: 61%, 100%; health professionals: 94%, 95% CI: 76%, 100%), with health professionals \"mostly/completely responsible\" at times of injury (artistic staff: 83%, 95% CI: 41%, 99%; health professionals: 95% CI: 61%, 96%). Both groups reported using individual modification to manage training loads and recognized the benefits of rest. Artistic staff recognized the need to modify training when injured, in line with experience levels, workload, age, and general health. Both groups \"agree/strongly agree\" that monitoring would be or is useful (artistic staff: 83%, 95% CI: 41%, 99%; health professionals: 95% CI: 61%, 96%). This investigation provides insight into the perceptions of artistic staff and health professionals with experience in dance toward training practices. Artistic staff and health professionals need to work together and adapt monitoring practices to their context to support artistic staff in planning training. The findings guide the implementation of these interventions by understanding potential barriers to their effectiveness that may potentially reduce injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":46421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12678/1089-313X.121522d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of training load practices of dance artistic and health professionals. Artistic staff and health professionals with experience in dance were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey study relating to training load practices in pre-professional and professional, ballet and contemporary dance. The survey was developed from previous investigations in soccer and consisted of multiple-choice, Likert scale, and free-text responses. Responses to closed questions were reported by percentage and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Thematic analysis was performed by two independent assessors of free-text responses. There were six artistic staff and 18 health professional participants. Artistic staff were perceived to be "mostly/completely responsible" for planning training (artistic staff: 100%, 95% CI: 61%, 100%; health professionals: 94%, 95% CI: 76%, 100%), with health professionals "mostly/completely responsible" at times of injury (artistic staff: 83%, 95% CI: 41%, 99%; health professionals: 95% CI: 61%, 96%). Both groups reported using individual modification to manage training loads and recognized the benefits of rest. Artistic staff recognized the need to modify training when injured, in line with experience levels, workload, age, and general health. Both groups "agree/strongly agree" that monitoring would be or is useful (artistic staff: 83%, 95% CI: 41%, 99%; health professionals: 95% CI: 61%, 96%). This investigation provides insight into the perceptions of artistic staff and health professionals with experience in dance toward training practices. Artistic staff and health professionals need to work together and adapt monitoring practices to their context to support artistic staff in planning training. The findings guide the implementation of these interventions by understanding potential barriers to their effectiveness that may potentially reduce injury.

艺术与健康专业人士对专业前与专业芭蕾与现代舞训练负荷的认知:一项横断面调查。
本研究旨在探讨舞蹈艺术与健康专业人员对训练负荷练习的认知。邀请具有舞蹈经验的艺术工作人员和保健专业人员参加一项关于专业前和专业、芭蕾舞和现代舞训练负荷实践的横断面调查研究。这项调查是在先前的足球调查基础上发展起来的,包括多项选择题、李克特量表和自由文本回答。对封闭式问题的回答以百分比和95%置信区间(95% CI)报告。主题分析由两名独立的评估者对自由文本的回应进行。有6名艺术工作人员和18名保健专业人员参加。美术人员被认为“主要/完全负责”计划培训(美术人员:100%,95% CI: 61%, 100%;卫生专业人员:94%,95% CI: 76%, 100%),卫生专业人员在受伤时“主要/完全负责”(艺术人员:83%,95% CI: 41%, 99%;卫生专业人员:95%置信区间:61%,96%)。两组都报告使用个人修改来管理训练负荷,并认识到休息的好处。艺术工作人员认识到受伤时需要根据经验水平、工作量、年龄和一般健康状况调整训练。两个群体都“同意/强烈同意”监控是有用的(美术人员:83%,95% CI: 41%, 99%;卫生专业人员:95%置信区间:61%,96%)。这项调查提供了洞察艺术人员和卫生专业人员对舞蹈训练实践的看法。艺术工作人员和卫生专业人员需要共同努力,根据自身情况调整监测做法,以支持艺术工作人员规划培训。研究结果通过了解这些干预措施有效性的潜在障碍来指导这些干预措施的实施,这些障碍可能会减少伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信