{"title":"Rasagiline as Adjunct to Levodopa for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Osamu Kano, Hiroshi Tsuda, Ayako Hayashi, Masaki Arai","doi":"10.1155/2022/4216452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rasagiline is a selective, irreversible monoamine oxidase type B inhibitor used as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease and as an adjunct therapy to levodopa in Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to provide updated evidence on the efficacy for motor and nonmotor symptoms and the safety of rasagiline/levodopa versus levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing motor fluctuations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted (January 18-19, 2021) using PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials comparing rasagiline/levodopa versus placebo/levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing motor fluctuations. Outcomes included change in wearing-off time, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)/Movement Disorder Society-UPDRS (MDS-UPDRS) II and III scores, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) summary index score. A random effect model was used to estimate the treatment effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies were included (1912 patients). Significant improvements in wearing-off time (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.92 to -0.09, <i>p</i> = 0.002), levodopa dosage (SMD: -0.18, 95% CI: -0.35 to -0.01, <i>p</i> = 0.041), UPDRS/MDS-UPDRS II (SMD: -0.39, 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.25, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), UPDRS/MDS-UPDRS III (SMD: -0.30, 95% CI: -0.44 to -0.16, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and PDQ-39 summary index score (SMD: -0.21, 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.013) were observed with rasagiline/levodopa versus placebo/levodopa. The incidence of TEAEs did not differ between treatments (risk ratio: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.98-1.30, <i>p</i> = 0.093).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis further indicated the superiority of rasagiline/levodopa in improving motor and nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, with a similar safety profile to that of levodopa in Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19907,"journal":{"name":"Parkinson's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"4216452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4216452","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Rasagiline is a selective, irreversible monoamine oxidase type B inhibitor used as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease and as an adjunct therapy to levodopa in Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations.
Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to provide updated evidence on the efficacy for motor and nonmotor symptoms and the safety of rasagiline/levodopa versus levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing motor fluctuations.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted (January 18-19, 2021) using PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials comparing rasagiline/levodopa versus placebo/levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing motor fluctuations. Outcomes included change in wearing-off time, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)/Movement Disorder Society-UPDRS (MDS-UPDRS) II and III scores, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) summary index score. A random effect model was used to estimate the treatment effects.
Results: Six studies were included (1912 patients). Significant improvements in wearing-off time (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.92 to -0.09, p = 0.002), levodopa dosage (SMD: -0.18, 95% CI: -0.35 to -0.01, p = 0.041), UPDRS/MDS-UPDRS II (SMD: -0.39, 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.25, p < 0.0001), UPDRS/MDS-UPDRS III (SMD: -0.30, 95% CI: -0.44 to -0.16, p < 0.0001), and PDQ-39 summary index score (SMD: -0.21, 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.04, p = 0.013) were observed with rasagiline/levodopa versus placebo/levodopa. The incidence of TEAEs did not differ between treatments (risk ratio: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.98-1.30, p = 0.093).
Conclusions: This meta-analysis further indicated the superiority of rasagiline/levodopa in improving motor and nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, with a similar safety profile to that of levodopa in Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations.
期刊介绍:
Parkinson’s Disease is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, genetics, cellular, molecular and neurophysiology, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson’s disease.