A process evaluation of Promotional Guides used by health visitors to support men's transition to fatherhood: a qualitative study.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Perspectives in Public Health Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-08 DOI:10.1177/17579139221118243
S Baldwin, M Malone, J Sandall, D Bick
{"title":"A process evaluation of Promotional Guides used by health visitors to support men's transition to fatherhood: a qualitative study.","authors":"S Baldwin, M Malone, J Sandall, D Bick","doi":"10.1177/17579139221118243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health visitors play an important role in supporting new parents in their transition to parenthood. A programme known as the Promotional Guide system is used by many health visitors in England with mothers and fathers to support this transition, but there is little known about health visitors' views of the Promotional Guides, how they are used in practice or barriers to effective implementation with fathers.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore the following: (1) health visitors' use of Promotional Guides with fathers, (2) health visitors' assessment of father's mental health and wellbeing and (3) facilitators and barriers to using Promotional Guides in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational cohort study and a process evaluation informed by the Medical Research Council guidance were conducted. A purposive sample of 11 health visitors was interviewed, and an additional seven were observed using the Promotional Guides in practice. Data were analysed using framework analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five main themes were identified from interview and observational data as follows: (1) Enquiry into fathers' mental health, (2) Promotional Guides in practice, (3) health visitors' perceptions of the Promotional Guides system, (4) barriers to using Promotional Guides with fathers and (5) facilitators and recommendations for using Promotional Guides with fathers. This study identified a number of barriers and facilitators to the use of Promotional Guides with fathers. Recommendations were made for improving services for first-time fathers, implementing the Promotional Guide system with fathers and highlighting areas for future research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study considered the acceptability, feasibility and fidelity of using the Promotional Guide programme with fathers from the health visitor's perspective. The findings provided an insight into health visitors' experiences of working with fathers, inquiring about men's mental health needs and their use of the Promotional Guides with men during the perinatal period.</p>","PeriodicalId":47256,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17579139221118243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health visitors play an important role in supporting new parents in their transition to parenthood. A programme known as the Promotional Guide system is used by many health visitors in England with mothers and fathers to support this transition, but there is little known about health visitors' views of the Promotional Guides, how they are used in practice or barriers to effective implementation with fathers.

Aims: The aim of this study was to explore the following: (1) health visitors' use of Promotional Guides with fathers, (2) health visitors' assessment of father's mental health and wellbeing and (3) facilitators and barriers to using Promotional Guides in practice.

Methods: A prospective observational cohort study and a process evaluation informed by the Medical Research Council guidance were conducted. A purposive sample of 11 health visitors was interviewed, and an additional seven were observed using the Promotional Guides in practice. Data were analysed using framework analysis.

Results: Five main themes were identified from interview and observational data as follows: (1) Enquiry into fathers' mental health, (2) Promotional Guides in practice, (3) health visitors' perceptions of the Promotional Guides system, (4) barriers to using Promotional Guides with fathers and (5) facilitators and recommendations for using Promotional Guides with fathers. This study identified a number of barriers and facilitators to the use of Promotional Guides with fathers. Recommendations were made for improving services for first-time fathers, implementing the Promotional Guide system with fathers and highlighting areas for future research.

Conclusion: This study considered the acceptability, feasibility and fidelity of using the Promotional Guide programme with fathers from the health visitor's perspective. The findings provided an insight into health visitors' experiences of working with fathers, inquiring about men's mental health needs and their use of the Promotional Guides with men during the perinatal period.

对健康访视者为支持男性向父亲过渡而使用的《宣传指南》进行过程评估:一项定性研究。
背景:健康访视员在支持初为父母者向为人父母者过渡的过程中发挥着重要作用。在英格兰,许多健康访视员对母亲和父亲使用一种被称为 "促进指南系统 "的方案来支持这一过渡,但对于健康访视员对 "促进指南 "的看法、如何在实践中使用或对父亲有效实施的障碍却知之甚少:(1) 健康访视者对父亲使用《促进指南》的情况;(2) 健康访视者对父亲心理健康和幸福的评估;(3) 在实践中使用《促进指南》的促进因素和障碍:方法:根据医学研究委员会的指导意见,开展了一项前瞻性观察队列研究和一项过程评估。对 11 名健康访视者进行了有目的的抽样访谈,并观察了另外 7 名健康访视者在实践中使用《促进指南》的情况。采用框架分析法对数据进行了分析:从访谈和观察数据中确定了以下五大主题:(1) 对父亲心理健康的调查,(2) 实践中的 "促进指南",(3) 健康访视者对 "促进指南 "系统的看法,(4) 对父亲使用 "促进指南 "的障碍,(5) 对父亲使用 "促进指南 "的促进因素和建议。这项研究发现了父亲使用 "促进指南 "的一些障碍和促进因素。研究还就如何改进为初为人父者提供的服务、如何与父亲一起实施《促进指南》系统以及如何突出今后研究的重点等问题提出了建议:本研究从健康访视员的角度出发,考虑了与父亲一起使用《促进指南》计划的可接受性、可行性和忠实性。研究结果提供了健康访视者与父亲合作、询问男性心理健康需求以及在围产期与男性一起使用《促进指南》的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives in Public Health
Perspectives in Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Public Health is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal. It is practice orientated and features current topics and opinions; news and views on current health issues; case studies; book reviews; letters to the Editor; as well as updates on the Society"s work. The journal also commissions articles for themed issues and publishes original peer-reviewed articles. Perspectives in Public Health"s primary aim is to be an invaluable resource for the Society"s members, who are health-promoting professionals from many disciplines, including environmental health, health protection, health and safety, food safety and nutrition, building and engineering, primary care, academia and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信