Validation of Clinical COPD Phenotypes for Prognosis of Long-Term Mortality in Swedish and Dutch Cohorts.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
S Gagatek, S R A Wijnant, B Ställberg, K Lisspers, G Brusselle, X Zhou, M Hasselgren, S Montgomeryi, J Sundhj, C Janson, Ö Emilsson, L Lahousse, A Malinovschi
{"title":"Validation of Clinical COPD Phenotypes for Prognosis of Long-Term Mortality in Swedish and Dutch Cohorts.","authors":"S Gagatek,&nbsp;S R A Wijnant,&nbsp;B Ställberg,&nbsp;K Lisspers,&nbsp;G Brusselle,&nbsp;X Zhou,&nbsp;M Hasselgren,&nbsp;S Montgomeryi,&nbsp;J Sundhj,&nbsp;C Janson,&nbsp;Ö Emilsson,&nbsp;L Lahousse,&nbsp;A Malinovschi","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2022.2039608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease with variable mortality risk. The aim of our investigation was to validate a simple clinical algorithm for long-term mortality previously proposed by Burgel <i>et al.</i> in 2017. Subjects with COPD from two cohorts, the Swedish PRAXIS study (<i>n</i> = 784, mean age (standard deviation (SD)) 64.0 years (7.5), 42% males) and the Rotterdam Study (<i>n</i> = 735, mean age (SD) 72 years (9.2), 57% males), were included. Five clinical clusters were derived from baseline data on age, body mass index, dyspnoea grade, pulmonary function and comorbidity (cardiovascular disease/diabetes). Cox models were used to study associations with 9-year mortality. The distribution of clinical clusters (1-5) was 29%/45%/8%/6%/12% in the PRAXIS study and 23%/26%/36%/0%/15% in the Rotterdam Study. The cumulative proportion of deaths at the 9-year follow-up was highest in clusters 1 (65%) and 4 (72%), and lowest in cluster 5 (10%) in the PRAXIS study. In the Rotterdam Study, cluster 1 (44%) had the highest cumulative mortality and cluster 5 (5%) the lowest. Compared with cluster 5, the meta-analysed age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for cluster 1 was 6.37 (3.94-10.32) and those for clusters 2 and 3 were 2.61 (1.58-4.32) and 3.06 (1.82-5.13), respectively. Burgel's clinical clusters can be used to predict long-term mortality risk. Clusters 1 and 4 are associated with the poorest prognosis, cluster 5 with the best prognosis and clusters 2 and 3 with intermediate prognosis in two independent cohorts from Sweden and the Netherlands.</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":" ","pages":"330-338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2022.2039608","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease with variable mortality risk. The aim of our investigation was to validate a simple clinical algorithm for long-term mortality previously proposed by Burgel et al. in 2017. Subjects with COPD from two cohorts, the Swedish PRAXIS study (n = 784, mean age (standard deviation (SD)) 64.0 years (7.5), 42% males) and the Rotterdam Study (n = 735, mean age (SD) 72 years (9.2), 57% males), were included. Five clinical clusters were derived from baseline data on age, body mass index, dyspnoea grade, pulmonary function and comorbidity (cardiovascular disease/diabetes). Cox models were used to study associations with 9-year mortality. The distribution of clinical clusters (1-5) was 29%/45%/8%/6%/12% in the PRAXIS study and 23%/26%/36%/0%/15% in the Rotterdam Study. The cumulative proportion of deaths at the 9-year follow-up was highest in clusters 1 (65%) and 4 (72%), and lowest in cluster 5 (10%) in the PRAXIS study. In the Rotterdam Study, cluster 1 (44%) had the highest cumulative mortality and cluster 5 (5%) the lowest. Compared with cluster 5, the meta-analysed age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for cluster 1 was 6.37 (3.94-10.32) and those for clusters 2 and 3 were 2.61 (1.58-4.32) and 3.06 (1.82-5.13), respectively. Burgel's clinical clusters can be used to predict long-term mortality risk. Clusters 1 and 4 are associated with the poorest prognosis, cluster 5 with the best prognosis and clusters 2 and 3 with intermediate prognosis in two independent cohorts from Sweden and the Netherlands.

瑞典和荷兰队列慢性阻塞性肺病临床表型对长期死亡率预后的验证。
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种具有可变死亡风险的异质性疾病。我们调查的目的是验证Burgel等人在2017年提出的一种简单的长期死亡率临床算法。COPD患者来自两个队列:瑞典PRAXIS研究(n = 784,平均年龄(标准差)64.0岁(7.5),男性42%)和鹿特丹研究(n = 735,平均年龄(SD) 72岁(9.2),男性57%)。从年龄、体重指数、呼吸困难等级、肺功能和合并症(心血管疾病/糖尿病)的基线数据中得出5个临床聚类。Cox模型用于研究与9年死亡率的关系。临床聚类(1-5)的分布在PRAXIS研究中为29%/45%/8%/6%/12%,在鹿特丹研究中为23%/26%/36%/0%/15%。在PRAXIS研究中,9年随访时的累积死亡比例在第1类(65%)和第4类(72%)中最高,在第5类(10%)中最低。在鹿特丹研究中,聚类1(44%)的累积死亡率最高,聚类5(5%)的累积死亡率最低。与聚类5比较,聚类1经年龄和性别调整后的meta分析风险比(95%可信区间)分别为6.37(3.94 ~ 10.32)、2.61(1.58 ~ 4.32)和3.06(1.82 ~ 5.13)。Burgel的临床聚类可以用来预测长期死亡风险。在来自瑞典和荷兰的两个独立队列中,第1和第4类患者预后最差,第5类患者预后最好,第2和第3类患者预后中等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From pathophysiology and cell biology to pharmacology and psychosocial impact, COPD: Journal Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease publishes a wide range of original research, reviews, case studies, and conference proceedings to promote advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and control of lung and airway disease and inflammation - providing a unique forum for the discussion, design, and evaluation of more efficient and effective strategies in patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信