Efficacy Testing of Personal Protective Filters on Biosafety Level 4 Positive Pressure Suits.

IF 0.7
Greg Fey, Anders Leung, Laura Landry, Gabriel Lightly, Samantha Kasloff, Todd Cutts, Jay Krishnan
{"title":"Efficacy Testing of Personal Protective Filters on Biosafety Level 4 Positive Pressure Suits.","authors":"Greg Fey,&nbsp;Anders Leung,&nbsp;Laura Landry,&nbsp;Gabriel Lightly,&nbsp;Samantha Kasloff,&nbsp;Todd Cutts,&nbsp;Jay Krishnan","doi":"10.1089/apb.20.0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Positive pressure breathing air-fed protective suits from three vendors are commonly used in biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) laboratories: they are Dover Chemturion suits (ILC Dover, DE), Delta suits (Honeywell Safety, NC), and HVO suits (HVO-ISSI-Deutschland GmbH, Germany). To address the potential risk of infectious agents being introduced through the supplied breathing air stream, some suit manufacturers incorporate protective filters on the suits themselves. However, these integrated filters are not amenable to in situ testing for efficacy verification. We have been using external filters from Matheson USA on the positive pressure suits since our BSL-4 laboratories were commissioned two decades ago. As part of our BSL-4 protective suit management program, we test these filters before them being put into use, and annually thereafter. In the past few years, we have observed these filters failing at a higher rate, as high as two out of three of the new filters tested at one point. <b>Objective:</b> The purpose of this study was to procure personal protective filters from other sources and validate their efficacy long-term. <b>Methods:</b> Filters from Respirex, HVO, and Honeywell were validated for filter integrity and filter loading. <b>Results:</b> Respirex filters performed well during the initial testing and periodic testing thereafter. Regular testing of the Respirex filters has now been ongoing for 30 months with continued successful performance. <b>Conclusion:</b> Filters from Respirex are a suitable option to protect personnel wearing positive pressure suits in BSL-4 laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":520561,"journal":{"name":"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association","volume":" ","pages":"66-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9134328/pdf/apb.20.0073.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.20.0073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Positive pressure breathing air-fed protective suits from three vendors are commonly used in biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) laboratories: they are Dover Chemturion suits (ILC Dover, DE), Delta suits (Honeywell Safety, NC), and HVO suits (HVO-ISSI-Deutschland GmbH, Germany). To address the potential risk of infectious agents being introduced through the supplied breathing air stream, some suit manufacturers incorporate protective filters on the suits themselves. However, these integrated filters are not amenable to in situ testing for efficacy verification. We have been using external filters from Matheson USA on the positive pressure suits since our BSL-4 laboratories were commissioned two decades ago. As part of our BSL-4 protective suit management program, we test these filters before them being put into use, and annually thereafter. In the past few years, we have observed these filters failing at a higher rate, as high as two out of three of the new filters tested at one point. Objective: The purpose of this study was to procure personal protective filters from other sources and validate their efficacy long-term. Methods: Filters from Respirex, HVO, and Honeywell were validated for filter integrity and filter loading. Results: Respirex filters performed well during the initial testing and periodic testing thereafter. Regular testing of the Respirex filters has now been ongoing for 30 months with continued successful performance. Conclusion: Filters from Respirex are a suitable option to protect personnel wearing positive pressure suits in BSL-4 laboratories.

四级生物安全正压服个人防护过滤器的功效测试。
简介:正压呼吸充气防护服通常用于生物安全4级(BSL-4)实验室:它们是Dover Chemturion套装(ILC Dover, DE), Delta套装(Honeywell Safety, NC)和HVO套装(HVO- issi - deutschland GmbH,德国)。为了解决通过供应的呼吸气流引入传染性病原体的潜在风险,一些服制造商在服上自行安装了防护过滤器。然而,这些集成过滤器不适合用于有效性验证的现场测试。自从我们的BSL-4实验室在二十年前投入使用以来,我们一直在使用Matheson USA的外部过滤器。作为我们BSL-4防护服管理计划的一部分,我们在这些过滤器投入使用之前对其进行测试,之后每年对其进行测试。在过去的几年里,我们观察到这些过滤器的失败率更高,在测试的新过滤器中,有三分之二的失败率高达一个点。目的:本研究的目的是从其他来源采购个人防护过滤器,并验证其长期疗效。方法:对来自Respirex、HVO和Honeywell的滤清器进行滤清器完整性和滤清器负载验证。结果:Respirex过滤器在初始测试和之后的定期测试中表现良好。对Respirex过滤器的定期测试已经进行了30个月,并取得了持续的成功。结论:Respirex过滤器是BSL-4实验室穿着正压服人员的合适选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书