Scaling Relationships of Maximal Gape in Two Species of Large Invasive Snakes, Brown Treesnakes and Burmese Pythons, and Implications for Maximal Prey Size.

IF 2.2 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Integrative Organismal Biology Pub Date : 2022-08-25 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/iob/obac033
Bruce C Jayne, Abigail L Bamberger, Douglas R Mader, Ian A Bartoszek
{"title":"Scaling Relationships of Maximal Gape in Two Species of Large Invasive Snakes, Brown Treesnakes and Burmese Pythons, and Implications for Maximal Prey Size.","authors":"Bruce C Jayne, Abigail L Bamberger, Douglas R Mader, Ian A Bartoszek","doi":"10.1093/iob/obac033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Snakes are a phylogenetically diverse (> 3500 species) clade of gape-limited predators that consume diverse prey and have considerable ontogenetic and interspecific variation in size, but empirical data on maximal gape are very limited. To test how overall size predicts gape, we quantified the scaling relationships between maximal gape, overall size, and several cranial dimensions for a wide range of sizes (mass 8-64,100 g) for two large, invasive snake species: Burmese pythons (<i>Python molorus bivittatus</i>) and brown treesnakes (<i>Boiga irregularis</i>). Although skull size scaled with negative allometry relative to overall size, isometry and positive allometry commonly occurred for other measurements. For similar snout-vent lengths (SVL), the maximal gape areas of Burmese pythons were approximately 4-6 times greater than those of brown treesnakes, mainly as a result of having a significantly larger relative contribution to gape by the intermandibular soft tissues (43% vs. 17%). In both snake species and for all types of prey, the scaling relationships predicted that relative prey mass (RPM) at maximal gape decreased precipitously with increased overall snake size. For a given SVL or mass, the predicted maximal values of RPM of the Burmese pythons exceeded those of brown treesnakes for all prey types, and predicted values of RPM were usually least for chickens, greatest for limbed reptiles and intermediate for mammals. The pythons we studied are noteworthy for having large overall size and gape that is large even after correcting for overall size, both of which could facilitate some large individuals (SVL = 5 m) exploiting very large vertebrate prey (e.g., deer > 50 kg). Although brown treesnakes had longer quadrate bones, Burmese pythons had larger absolute and larger relative gape as a combined result of larger overall size, larger relative head size, and most importantly, greater stretch of the soft tissues.</p>","PeriodicalId":13666,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Organismal Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Organismal Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obac033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Snakes are a phylogenetically diverse (> 3500 species) clade of gape-limited predators that consume diverse prey and have considerable ontogenetic and interspecific variation in size, but empirical data on maximal gape are very limited. To test how overall size predicts gape, we quantified the scaling relationships between maximal gape, overall size, and several cranial dimensions for a wide range of sizes (mass 8-64,100 g) for two large, invasive snake species: Burmese pythons (Python molorus bivittatus) and brown treesnakes (Boiga irregularis). Although skull size scaled with negative allometry relative to overall size, isometry and positive allometry commonly occurred for other measurements. For similar snout-vent lengths (SVL), the maximal gape areas of Burmese pythons were approximately 4-6 times greater than those of brown treesnakes, mainly as a result of having a significantly larger relative contribution to gape by the intermandibular soft tissues (43% vs. 17%). In both snake species and for all types of prey, the scaling relationships predicted that relative prey mass (RPM) at maximal gape decreased precipitously with increased overall snake size. For a given SVL or mass, the predicted maximal values of RPM of the Burmese pythons exceeded those of brown treesnakes for all prey types, and predicted values of RPM were usually least for chickens, greatest for limbed reptiles and intermediate for mammals. The pythons we studied are noteworthy for having large overall size and gape that is large even after correcting for overall size, both of which could facilitate some large individuals (SVL = 5 m) exploiting very large vertebrate prey (e.g., deer > 50 kg). Although brown treesnakes had longer quadrate bones, Burmese pythons had larger absolute and larger relative gape as a combined result of larger overall size, larger relative head size, and most importantly, greater stretch of the soft tissues.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

两种大型入侵蛇类--棕色树蛇和缅甸蟒蛇--最大蛇口的比例关系以及对最大猎物大小的影响。
蛇类是一个系统发育多样(超过 3500 种)的有张弛度限制的食肉动物支系,它们捕食多种猎物,在个体发育和种间大小方面有相当大的差异,但有关最大张口的经验数据非常有限。为了检验整体大小如何预测张口量,我们量化了两种大型入侵蛇类的最大张口量、整体大小和几种颅骨尺寸之间的比例关系:缅甸蟒(Python molorus bivittatus)和棕色树蛇(Boiga irregularis)。虽然头骨大小相对于整体大小呈负异性,但其他测量值通常呈等量和正异性。在吻端-鼻孔长度(SVL)相似的情况下,缅甸蟒的最大蛇口面积大约是棕色树蛇的 4-6 倍,这主要是因为颌间软组织对蛇口的相对贡献较大(43% 对 17%)。在这两种蛇和所有类型的猎物中,根据比例关系预测,最大张口处的相对猎物质量(RPM)会随着蛇的总体大小增加而急剧下降。在给定的SVL或质量下,对于所有类型的猎物,缅甸蟒的RPM预测最大值都超过了棕树蛇的RPM预测最大值,对于鸡的RPM预测值通常最小,对于有肢爬行动物的RPM预测值最大,而对于哺乳动物的RPM预测值介于两者之间。值得注意的是,我们所研究的蟒蛇具有较大的整体尺寸和即使校正整体尺寸后仍较大的张口,这两者都有助于一些大型个体(SVL = 5 米)捕食超大型脊椎动物猎物(例如,体重大于 50 千克的鹿)。虽然棕树蛇的四肢骨较长,但缅甸蟒的绝对张口和相对张口都较大,这是由于其整体尺寸较大、相对头部尺寸较大,最重要的是软组织的伸展性较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信