A comparison of the microbiology profile for periprosthetic joint infection of knee arthroplasty and lower-limb endoprostheses in tumour surgery.

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection Pub Date : 2022-08-08 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5194/jbji-7-177-2022
Robert A McCulloch, Amirul Adlan, Neil Jenkins, Michael Parry, Jonathan D Stevenson, Lee Jeys
{"title":"A comparison of the microbiology profile for periprosthetic joint infection of knee arthroplasty and lower-limb endoprostheses in tumour surgery.","authors":"Robert A McCulloch,&nbsp;Amirul Adlan,&nbsp;Neil Jenkins,&nbsp;Michael Parry,&nbsp;Jonathan D Stevenson,&nbsp;Lee Jeys","doi":"10.5194/jbji-7-177-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims</b>: this study compared the patient and microbiological profile of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) for patients treated with two-stage revision for knee arthroplasty with that of lower-limb endoprostheses for oncological resection. <b>Patient and methods</b>: a total of 118 patients were treated with two-stage revision surgery for infected knee arthroplasty and lower-limb endoprostheses between 1999 and 2019. A total of 74 patients had two-stage revision for PJI of knee arthroplasty, and 44 had two-stage revision of oncology knee endoprostheses. There were 68 men and 50 women. The mean ages of the arthroplasty and oncology cohorts were 70.2 years (range of 50-89) and 36.1 years (range of 12-78) respectively ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn></mrow> </math> .01). Patient host and extremity criteria were categorized according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) host and extremity staging system. The patient microbiological culture, the incidence of polymicrobial infection, and multidrug resistance (MDR) were analysed and recorded. <b>Results</b>: polymicrobial infection was reported in 16 % (12 patients) of knee arthroplasty PJI cases and in 14.5 % (8 patients) of endoprostheses PJI cases ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn></mrow> </math> .783). There was a significantly higher incidence of MDR in endoprostheses PJI, isolated in 36.4 % of cultures, compared with knee arthroplasty PJI (17.2 %, <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn></mrow> </math> .01). Gram-positive organisms were isolated in more than 80 % of cultures from both cohorts. Coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococcus</i> (CoNS) was the most common Gram-positive organism, and <i>Escherichia coli</i> was the most common Gram-negative organism in both groups. According to the MSIS staging system, the host and extremity grades of the oncology PJI cohort were significantly worse than those for the arthroplasty PJI cohort ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn></mrow> </math> .05). <b>Conclusion</b>: empirical antibiotic prophylaxis against PJI in orthopaedic oncology is based upon PJI in arthroplasty, despite oncology patients presenting with worse host and extremity staging. CoNS was the most common infective organism in both groups; however, pathogens showing MDR were significantly more prevalent in oncological PJI of the knee. Therefore, empirical broad-spectrum treatment is recommended in oncological patients following revision surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399934/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-177-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aims: this study compared the patient and microbiological profile of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) for patients treated with two-stage revision for knee arthroplasty with that of lower-limb endoprostheses for oncological resection. Patient and methods: a total of 118 patients were treated with two-stage revision surgery for infected knee arthroplasty and lower-limb endoprostheses between 1999 and 2019. A total of 74 patients had two-stage revision for PJI of knee arthroplasty, and 44 had two-stage revision of oncology knee endoprostheses. There were 68 men and 50 women. The mean ages of the arthroplasty and oncology cohorts were 70.2 years (range of 50-89) and 36.1 years (range of 12-78) respectively ( p < 0 .01). Patient host and extremity criteria were categorized according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) host and extremity staging system. The patient microbiological culture, the incidence of polymicrobial infection, and multidrug resistance (MDR) were analysed and recorded. Results: polymicrobial infection was reported in 16 % (12 patients) of knee arthroplasty PJI cases and in 14.5 % (8 patients) of endoprostheses PJI cases ( p = 0 .783). There was a significantly higher incidence of MDR in endoprostheses PJI, isolated in 36.4 % of cultures, compared with knee arthroplasty PJI (17.2 %, p = 0 .01). Gram-positive organisms were isolated in more than 80 % of cultures from both cohorts. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) was the most common Gram-positive organism, and Escherichia coli was the most common Gram-negative organism in both groups. According to the MSIS staging system, the host and extremity grades of the oncology PJI cohort were significantly worse than those for the arthroplasty PJI cohort ( p < 0 .05). Conclusion: empirical antibiotic prophylaxis against PJI in orthopaedic oncology is based upon PJI in arthroplasty, despite oncology patients presenting with worse host and extremity staging. CoNS was the most common infective organism in both groups; however, pathogens showing MDR were significantly more prevalent in oncological PJI of the knee. Therefore, empirical broad-spectrum treatment is recommended in oncological patients following revision surgery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肿瘤手术中膝关节置换术与下肢内假体假体周围关节感染的微生物学比较。
目的:本研究比较膝关节置换术两期翻修与下肢人工关节切除术患者假体关节感染(PJI)的患者和微生物特征。患者和方法:1999年至2019年,共118例患者接受了感染膝关节置换术和下肢内假体两期翻修手术。共有74例患者对膝关节置换术的PJI进行了两期翻修,44例患者对肿瘤膝关节内假体进行了两期翻修。共有68名男性和50名女性。关节置换术组和肿瘤组的平均年龄分别为70.2岁(50-89岁)和36.1岁(12-78岁)(p < 0.01)。根据肌肉骨骼感染学会(MSIS)宿主和四肢分期系统对患者宿主和四肢标准进行分类。分析并记录患者微生物培养、多菌感染发生率、多药耐药情况。结果:膝关节置换术中出现多微生物感染的比例为16. %(12例),人工膝关节置换术中出现多微生物感染的比例为14. %(8例)(p = 0.783)。与膝关节置换术PJI(17.2 %,p = 0.01)相比,人工假体PJI的MDR发生率显著高于人工膝关节PJI(36.4% %)。在两个队列中,革兰氏阳性菌在80%以上 %的培养物中分离出来。两组中最常见的革兰氏阳性菌为凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(con),最常见的革兰氏阴性菌为大肠杆菌。根据MSIS分期系统,肿瘤PJI组的宿主和肢体分级明显低于关节置换术PJI组(p < 0.05)。结论:尽管肿瘤患者表现出较差的宿主和肢体分期,但骨科肿瘤患者的PJI经验抗生素预防是基于关节成形术中的PJI。con是两组最常见的感染菌;然而,显示耐多药的病原体在膝关节肿瘤PJI中更为普遍。因此,在肿瘤患者翻修手术后,推荐经验性广谱治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信