Evaluating molecular representations in machine learning models for drug response prediction and interpretability.

IF 1.5 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics Pub Date : 2022-08-26 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1515/jib-2022-0006
Delora Baptista, João Correia, Bruno Pereira, Miguel Rocha
{"title":"Evaluating molecular representations in machine learning models for drug response prediction and interpretability.","authors":"Delora Baptista, João Correia, Bruno Pereira, Miguel Rocha","doi":"10.1515/jib-2022-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used to guide drug discovery processes. When applying ML approaches to chemical datasets, molecular descriptors and fingerprints are typically used to represent compounds as numerical vectors. However, in recent years, end-to-end deep learning (DL) methods that can learn feature representations directly from line notations or molecular graphs have been proposed as alternatives to using precomputed features. This study set out to investigate which compound representation methods are the most suitable for drug sensitivity prediction in cancer cell lines. Twelve different representations were benchmarked on 5 compound screening datasets, using DeepMol, a new chemoinformatics package developed by our research group, to perform these analyses. The results of this study show that the predictive performance of end-to-end DL models is comparable to, and at times surpasses, that of models trained on molecular fingerprints, even when less training data is available. This study also found that combining several compound representation methods into an ensemble can improve performance. Finally, we show that a <i>post hoc</i> feature attribution method can boost the explainability of the DL models.</p>","PeriodicalId":53625,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jib-2022-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used to guide drug discovery processes. When applying ML approaches to chemical datasets, molecular descriptors and fingerprints are typically used to represent compounds as numerical vectors. However, in recent years, end-to-end deep learning (DL) methods that can learn feature representations directly from line notations or molecular graphs have been proposed as alternatives to using precomputed features. This study set out to investigate which compound representation methods are the most suitable for drug sensitivity prediction in cancer cell lines. Twelve different representations were benchmarked on 5 compound screening datasets, using DeepMol, a new chemoinformatics package developed by our research group, to perform these analyses. The results of this study show that the predictive performance of end-to-end DL models is comparable to, and at times surpasses, that of models trained on molecular fingerprints, even when less training data is available. This study also found that combining several compound representation methods into an ensemble can improve performance. Finally, we show that a post hoc feature attribution method can boost the explainability of the DL models.

评估用于药物反应预测和可解释性的机器学习模型中的分子表征。
机器学习(ML)越来越多地用于指导药物发现过程。在将 ML 方法应用于化学数据集时,分子描述符和指纹通常用于将化合物表示为数字向量。然而,近年来,有人提出了端到端深度学习(DL)方法,这种方法可以直接从线条符号或分子图中学习特征表示,作为使用预计算特征的替代方法。本研究旨在调查哪种化合物表示方法最适合预测癌细胞系的药物敏感性。我们在 5 个化合物筛选数据集上对 12 种不同的表示方法进行了基准测试,并使用我们研究小组开发的新型化学信息学软件包 DeepMol 进行了这些分析。这项研究的结果表明,端到端 DL 模型的预测性能可与分子指纹训练的模型相媲美,有时甚至超过后者,即使在训练数据较少的情况下也是如此。这项研究还发现,将几种复合表示方法组合在一起可以提高性能。最后,我们展示了一种事后特征归因方法可以提高 DL 模型的可解释性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics
Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
12 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信