Harmonising adult and paediatric reference intervals in australia and new zealand: an evidence-based approach for establishing a first panel of chemistry analytes.

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Clinical Biochemist Reviews Pub Date : 2014-11-01
Jillian R Tate, Ken A Sikaris, Graham Rd Jones, Tina Yen, Gus Koerbin, Julie Ryan, Maxine Reed, Janice Gill, George Koumantakis, Peter Hickman, Peter Graham
{"title":"Harmonising adult and paediatric reference intervals in australia and new zealand: an evidence-based approach for establishing a first panel of chemistry analytes.","authors":"Jillian R Tate, Ken A Sikaris, Graham Rd Jones, Tina Yen, Gus Koerbin, Julie Ryan, Maxine Reed, Janice Gill, George Koumantakis, Peter Hickman, Peter Graham","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific evidence supports the use of common reference intervals (RIs) for many general chemistry analytes, in particular those with sound calibration and traceability in place. Already the Nordic countries and United Kingdom have largely achieved harmonised RIs. Following a series of workshops organised by the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists (AACB) between 2012 and 2014 at which an evidence-based approach for determination of common intervals was developed, pathology organisations in Australia and New Zealand have reached a scientific consensus on what adult and paediatric intervals we should use across Australasia. The aim of this report is to describe the processes that the AACB and the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia have taken towards recommending the implementation of a first panel of common RIs for use in Australasia. </p>","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"35 4","pages":"213-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310061/pdf/cbr-35-213.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific evidence supports the use of common reference intervals (RIs) for many general chemistry analytes, in particular those with sound calibration and traceability in place. Already the Nordic countries and United Kingdom have largely achieved harmonised RIs. Following a series of workshops organised by the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists (AACB) between 2012 and 2014 at which an evidence-based approach for determination of common intervals was developed, pathology organisations in Australia and New Zealand have reached a scientific consensus on what adult and paediatric intervals we should use across Australasia. The aim of this report is to describe the processes that the AACB and the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia have taken towards recommending the implementation of a first panel of common RIs for use in Australasia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

统一澳大利亚和新西兰的成人和儿科参考区间:以证据为基础的方法建立第一组化学分析物。
科学证据支持对许多普通化学分析物使用通用参考区间 (RIs),特别是那些具有良好校准和可追溯性的分析物。北欧国家和英国已经在很大程度上实现了参考区间的统一。澳大拉西亚临床生物化学家协会(AACB)在2012年至2014年期间组织了一系列研讨会,制定了以证据为基础的方法来确定通用区间,之后,澳大利亚和新西兰的病理组织就我们应该在整个澳大拉西亚使用何种成人和儿科区间达成了科学共识。本报告旨在介绍澳大利亚病理学委员会和澳大拉西亚皇家病理学家学院为建议在澳大拉西亚实施首批通用 RIs 而采取的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Biochemist Reviews
Clinical Biochemist Reviews Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信