Buprenorphine Response as a Function of Neurogenetic Polymorphic Antecedents: Can Dopamine Genes Affect Clinical Outcomes in Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS)?

Kenneth Blum, Marlene Oscar-Berman, William Jacobs, Thomas McLaughlin, Mark S Gold
{"title":"Buprenorphine Response as a Function of Neurogenetic Polymorphic Antecedents: Can Dopamine Genes Affect Clinical Outcomes in Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS)?","authors":"Kenneth Blum,&nbsp;Marlene Oscar-Berman,&nbsp;William Jacobs,&nbsp;Thomas McLaughlin,&nbsp;Mark S Gold","doi":"10.4172/2155-6105.1000185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a plethora of research indicating the successful treatment of opioid dependence with either buprenorphine alone or in combination with naloxone (Suboxone®). However, we encourage caution in long-term maintenance with these drugs, albeit, lack of any other FDA approved opioid maintenance compound to date. Our concern has been supported by severe withdrawal (even with tapering of the dosage of for example Suboxone® which is 40 times more potent than morphine) from low dose of buprenorphine (alone or with naloxone). In addition our findings of a long-term flat affect in chronic Suboxone® patients amongst other unwanted side effects including diversion and suicide attempts provides impetus to reconsider long-term utilization. However, it seems prudent to embrace genetic testing to reveal reward circuitry gene polymorphisms especially those related to dopaminergic pathways as well as opioid receptor(s) as a way of improving treatment outcomes. Understanding the interaction of reward circuitry involvement in buprenorphine effects and respective genotypes provide a novel framework to augment a patient's clinical experience and benefits during opioid replacement therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of addiction research & therapy","volume":"5 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-6105.1000185","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of addiction research & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.1000185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

There is a plethora of research indicating the successful treatment of opioid dependence with either buprenorphine alone or in combination with naloxone (Suboxone®). However, we encourage caution in long-term maintenance with these drugs, albeit, lack of any other FDA approved opioid maintenance compound to date. Our concern has been supported by severe withdrawal (even with tapering of the dosage of for example Suboxone® which is 40 times more potent than morphine) from low dose of buprenorphine (alone or with naloxone). In addition our findings of a long-term flat affect in chronic Suboxone® patients amongst other unwanted side effects including diversion and suicide attempts provides impetus to reconsider long-term utilization. However, it seems prudent to embrace genetic testing to reveal reward circuitry gene polymorphisms especially those related to dopaminergic pathways as well as opioid receptor(s) as a way of improving treatment outcomes. Understanding the interaction of reward circuitry involvement in buprenorphine effects and respective genotypes provide a novel framework to augment a patient's clinical experience and benefits during opioid replacement therapy.

丁丙诺啡反应作为神经遗传多态性前因的功能:多巴胺基因能否影响奖励缺乏综合征(RDS)的临床结果?
有大量的研究表明,丁丙诺啡单独或与纳洛酮(Suboxone®)联合成功治疗阿片类药物依赖。然而,我们鼓励谨慎使用这些药物的长期维持,尽管迄今为止缺乏任何其他FDA批准的阿片类维持化合物。低剂量丁丙诺啡(单独使用或与纳洛酮一起使用)的严重戒断(即使逐渐减少剂量,例如比吗啡强40倍的苏博松®)也支持了我们的担忧。此外,我们发现慢性Suboxone®患者的长期平稳影响以及其他不良副作用,包括转移和自杀企图,为重新考虑长期使用提供了动力。然而,采用基因检测来揭示奖励回路基因多态性,特别是那些与多巴胺能通路和阿片受体相关的基因多态性,作为改善治疗结果的一种方法,似乎是谨慎的。理解奖赏回路参与丁丙诺啡效应和各自基因型的相互作用,为增加患者在阿片类药物替代治疗期间的临床体验和获益提供了一个新的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信