TelePain: A Community of Practice for Pain Management.

Alexa R Meins, Ardith Z Doorenbos, Linda Eaton, Debra Gordon, Brian Theodore, David Tauben
{"title":"TelePain: A Community of Practice for Pain Management.","authors":"Alexa R Meins,&nbsp;Ardith Z Doorenbos,&nbsp;Linda Eaton,&nbsp;Debra Gordon,&nbsp;Brian Theodore,&nbsp;David Tauben","doi":"10.4172/2167-0846.1000177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Comprehensive pain management services are primarily located in urban areas, limiting specialist consultation opportunities for community healthcare providers. A community of practice (CoP) for pain management could create opportunities for consultation by establishing professional relationships between community healthcare providers and pain management specialists. A CoP is a group of people with a common concern, set of problems, or a passion for something they do. Members of a CoP for pain management increase their knowledge of evidence-based pain management strategies in a way that is meaningful and relevant. In this article, we provide evidence that TelePain, an interdisciplinary, case-based pain management teleconference consultation program through the University of Washington, qualifies as a CoP and present preliminary evidence of TelePain's effectiveness as a CoP for pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Specific behaviors and conversations gathered through participant observation during TelePain sessions were analyzed based on the 14 indicators Wegner developed to evaluate the presence of a CoP. To demonstrate preliminary effectiveness of TelePain as a CoP for pain management, descriptive statistics were used to summarize TelePain evaluation forms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TelePain is an example of a successful CoP for pain management as demonstrated by the presence of Wegner's 14 indicators. Additionally, evaluation forms showed that TelePain enhanced community healthcare providers' knowledge of pain management strategies and that continued participation in TelePain lead to community healthcare providers' increased confidence in their ability to provide pain management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TelePain, a CoP for pain management, facilitates multidisciplinary collaboration and allows members to develop interdisciplinary care plans for complex pain patients through case study discussions. Evidence-based pain management strategies gained through CoP membership could be disseminated to other healthcare providers in members' clinics, which has the potential of improving the care of chronic pain patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":90614,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain & relief","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2167-0846.1000177","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain & relief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0846.1000177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Introduction: Comprehensive pain management services are primarily located in urban areas, limiting specialist consultation opportunities for community healthcare providers. A community of practice (CoP) for pain management could create opportunities for consultation by establishing professional relationships between community healthcare providers and pain management specialists. A CoP is a group of people with a common concern, set of problems, or a passion for something they do. Members of a CoP for pain management increase their knowledge of evidence-based pain management strategies in a way that is meaningful and relevant. In this article, we provide evidence that TelePain, an interdisciplinary, case-based pain management teleconference consultation program through the University of Washington, qualifies as a CoP and present preliminary evidence of TelePain's effectiveness as a CoP for pain management.

Methods: Specific behaviors and conversations gathered through participant observation during TelePain sessions were analyzed based on the 14 indicators Wegner developed to evaluate the presence of a CoP. To demonstrate preliminary effectiveness of TelePain as a CoP for pain management, descriptive statistics were used to summarize TelePain evaluation forms.

Results: TelePain is an example of a successful CoP for pain management as demonstrated by the presence of Wegner's 14 indicators. Additionally, evaluation forms showed that TelePain enhanced community healthcare providers' knowledge of pain management strategies and that continued participation in TelePain lead to community healthcare providers' increased confidence in their ability to provide pain management.

Conclusion: TelePain, a CoP for pain management, facilitates multidisciplinary collaboration and allows members to develop interdisciplinary care plans for complex pain patients through case study discussions. Evidence-based pain management strategies gained through CoP membership could be disseminated to other healthcare providers in members' clinics, which has the potential of improving the care of chronic pain patients.

TelePain:疼痛管理实践社区。
全面的疼痛管理服务主要位于城市地区,限制了社区医疗保健提供者的专家咨询机会。疼痛管理的实践社区(CoP)可以通过在社区医疗保健提供者和疼痛管理专家之间建立专业关系来创造咨询机会。CoP是一群人,他们有共同的关注,共同的问题,或者对他们所做的事情充满热情。疼痛管理CoP的成员以一种有意义和相关的方式增加了他们对循证疼痛管理策略的知识。在这篇文章中,我们提供的证据表明,TelePain,一个跨学科的、基于病例的疼痛管理远程会议咨询项目,通过华盛顿大学,符合CoP的资格,并提供了TelePain作为疼痛管理CoP的有效性的初步证据。方法:根据Wegner制定的评估CoP存在的14个指标,对TelePain会议期间通过参与者观察收集到的具体行为和对话进行分析。为了证明TelePain作为疼痛管理CoP的初步有效性,描述性统计用于总结TelePain评估表格。结果:通过Wegner的14个指标,TelePain是一个成功的CoP用于疼痛管理的例子。此外,评估表格显示,TelePain增强了社区医疗保健提供者对疼痛管理策略的了解,并且继续参与TelePain会增加社区医疗保健提供者对其提供疼痛管理能力的信心。结论:TelePain是一个疼痛管理CoP,促进多学科合作,允许成员通过案例研究讨论为复杂疼痛患者制定跨学科护理计划。通过CoP会员资格获得的基于证据的疼痛管理策略可以传播给会员诊所的其他医疗保健提供者,这有可能改善慢性疼痛患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信