Systematic Reviews of the Health or Health care of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review to Identify Gaps in the Evidence Base.

IF 1.9

Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID Pub Date : 2015-11-01 Epub Date: 2015-03-31 DOI:10.1111/jar.12149

Janet Robertson, Chris Hatton, Susannah Baines, Eric Emerson

{"title":"Systematic Reviews of the Health or Health care of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review to Identify Gaps in the Evidence Base.","authors":"Janet Robertson, Chris Hatton, Susannah Baines, Eric Emerson","doi":"10.1111/jar.12149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Systematic reviews are important in evaluating evidence concerning the health of people with intellectual disabilities. This study conducts a systematic review to identify strengths and gaps in this evidence.Method: Electronic literature searches and email requests identified systematic reviews published in English from 2008 to 2013 on the health or health care of people with intellectual disabilities. Reviews were categorized using ICD-10 chapter headings and information extracted regarding methods, number of studies reviewed and findings.Results: Ninety-four reviews were identified: 52 related to ICD-10 Chapter V: Mental or behavioural disorders, 28 to Chapter XXI: Factors influencing health status and contact with services, and 14 related to other chapters or encompassed multiple chapters. Nine reviews were 'empty'. No reviews were found for many ICD-10 chapter headings.Conclusions: Systematic reviews are heavily weighted towards mental health, with little coverage of several areas important to the health and mortality of people with intellectual disabilities.","PeriodicalId":73610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","volume":"28 6","pages":"455-523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Systematic reviews are important in evaluating evidence concerning the health of people with intellectual disabilities. This study conducts a systematic review to identify strengths and gaps in this evidence.

Method: Electronic literature searches and email requests identified systematic reviews published in English from 2008 to 2013 on the health or health care of people with intellectual disabilities. Reviews were categorized using ICD-10 chapter headings and information extracted regarding methods, number of studies reviewed and findings.

Results: Ninety-four reviews were identified: 52 related to ICD-10 Chapter V: Mental or behavioural disorders, 28 to Chapter XXI: Factors influencing health status and contact with services, and 14 related to other chapters or encompassed multiple chapters. Nine reviews were 'empty'. No reviews were found for many ICD-10 chapter headings.

Conclusions: Systematic reviews are heavily weighted towards mental health, with little coverage of several areas important to the health and mortality of people with intellectual disabilities.

查看原文本刊更多论文

智障人士健康或卫生保健的系统评价：一项识别证据基础差距的系统评价。

背景：系统评价对于评估智力残疾者健康状况的证据非常重要。本研究进行了系统回顾，以确定这些证据的优势和差距。方法：电子文献检索和电子邮件请求识别2008年至2013年发表的关于智力残疾者健康或卫生保健的英文系统综述。使用ICD-10章节标题和提取的关于方法、审查的研究数量和发现的信息对综述进行分类。结果：确定了94项审查：52项与ICD-10第5章：精神或行为障碍有关，28项与第21章：影响健康状况和与服务接触的因素有关，14项与其他章节有关或包含多个章节。9条评论是“空的”。ICD-10的许多章节标题未见评论。结论：系统评价严重偏重于心理健康，对智力残疾者健康和死亡率重要的几个领域的覆盖很少。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID

自引率

0.00%

发文量