[Comparison of phenotypic methods for the detection of beta-lactamases MBL in strains from the Enterobacteriaceae family and non-fermentative bacilli isolated from clinical specimens].

Kornelia Dobrzaniecka, Andrzej Młynarczyk, Ksenia Szymanek-Majchrzak, Grazyna Młynarczyk
{"title":"[Comparison of phenotypic methods for the detection of beta-lactamases MBL in strains from the Enterobacteriaceae family and non-fermentative bacilli isolated from clinical specimens].","authors":"Kornelia Dobrzaniecka,&nbsp;Andrzej Młynarczyk,&nbsp;Ksenia Szymanek-Majchrzak,&nbsp;Grazyna Młynarczyk","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bacterial resistance is growing because of treatment a broad spectrum antibio- tics. Gram-negative pathogens which producing carbapenemase are a one of major problem in many hospitals. Rapid detection those strains provide an early inhibition of infection and control the expansion of microorganisms. The aim of work was to characterize the frequency of appearance MBLs in specific groups of Gram-negative bacilli which are resistant or intermediate to at least one of carbapenems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bacterial isolates were collected from Baby Jesus Clinical Hospital from 2003 to 2009. Pathogens were isolated from urine, blood, fluids, swab of the wound, pharyngeal swab. They were identified by the ID 32 E (bioMérieux, France) and Vitek2. Antimicrobial resistance was marked by the ATB G-5 and ATB UR (bioMérieux, France). Detection of metalo-beta-lactamases was tested by disk diffusion test recommended by the EUCAST. The DDS test using imipenem, ceftazidime, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 2-mercaptopropionic acid (2-MPA). Positive test was reading as enlargement of inhibition zone about imipenem- or ceftazidime-impregnated disk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 88 isolates, 32 come fromEnterobacteriaceae and 56 from non-fermentative bacilli. All strains were tested of production of MBL by disk diffusion test. This method used two inhibitors: ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and 2-mercaptopropionic acid. As a result of EDTA there was 45 MBL positive strains. In apply 2-MPA there was 55 MBL positive strains. Both the EDTA and 2-MPA disk test showing the highest percentage of positive result in Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resistance to carbapenems in the non-fermentative bacilli occurs more often than in the Enterobacteriaceae. Method with 2-mercaptopropionic acid was more effective to detect metallo-beta-lactamases than EDTA. Concerns especially bacilli from Enterobacteriaceae.</p>","PeriodicalId":18521,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","volume":"66 3-4","pages":"177-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bacterial resistance is growing because of treatment a broad spectrum antibio- tics. Gram-negative pathogens which producing carbapenemase are a one of major problem in many hospitals. Rapid detection those strains provide an early inhibition of infection and control the expansion of microorganisms. The aim of work was to characterize the frequency of appearance MBLs in specific groups of Gram-negative bacilli which are resistant or intermediate to at least one of carbapenems.

Methods: Bacterial isolates were collected from Baby Jesus Clinical Hospital from 2003 to 2009. Pathogens were isolated from urine, blood, fluids, swab of the wound, pharyngeal swab. They were identified by the ID 32 E (bioMérieux, France) and Vitek2. Antimicrobial resistance was marked by the ATB G-5 and ATB UR (bioMérieux, France). Detection of metalo-beta-lactamases was tested by disk diffusion test recommended by the EUCAST. The DDS test using imipenem, ceftazidime, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 2-mercaptopropionic acid (2-MPA). Positive test was reading as enlargement of inhibition zone about imipenem- or ceftazidime-impregnated disk.

Results: Of the 88 isolates, 32 come fromEnterobacteriaceae and 56 from non-fermentative bacilli. All strains were tested of production of MBL by disk diffusion test. This method used two inhibitors: ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and 2-mercaptopropionic acid. As a result of EDTA there was 45 MBL positive strains. In apply 2-MPA there was 55 MBL positive strains. Both the EDTA and 2-MPA disk test showing the highest percentage of positive result in Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida.

Conclusions: Resistance to carbapenems in the non-fermentative bacilli occurs more often than in the Enterobacteriaceae. Method with 2-mercaptopropionic acid was more effective to detect metallo-beta-lactamases than EDTA. Concerns especially bacilli from Enterobacteriaceae.

[肠杆菌科菌株与临床分离非发酵杆菌β -内酰胺酶MBL表型检测方法的比较]。
导言:由于使用广谱抗生素治疗,细菌耐药性正在增加。革兰氏阴性病原菌产生碳青霉烯酶是许多医院面临的主要问题之一。这些菌株的快速检测提供了早期的感染抑制和控制微生物的扩张。工作的目的是表征出现MBLs的频率特定组革兰氏阴性杆菌耐药或中间至少一种碳青霉烯类。方法:收集2003 ~ 2009年在圣婴医院分离的细菌。从尿、血、液体、伤口拭子、咽拭子中分离病原体。它们由ID 32e (biomassrieux,法国)和Vitek2识别。采用ATB G-5和ATB UR (biomacrieux,法国)标记耐药性。采用EUCAST推荐的圆盘扩散法检测金属内酰胺酶。DDS试验采用亚胺培南、头孢他啶、乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和2-巯基丙酸(2-MPA)。阳性试验为亚胺培南或头孢他啶浸渍片的抑菌带扩大。结果:88株分离株中肠杆菌科32株,非发酵杆菌56株。采用圆盘扩散试验对各菌株进行了生产MBL的试验。该方法使用了两种抑制剂:乙二胺四乙酸和2-巯基丙酸。EDTA检测结果显示MBL阳性菌株45株。在2-MPA处理下,有55株MBL阳性菌株。EDTA和2-MPA圆盘试验均显示阴沟肠杆菌、粘质沙雷氏菌、铜绿假单胞菌和恶臭假单胞菌的阳性比例最高。结论:非发酵杆菌对碳青霉烯类耐药的发生率高于肠杆菌科。2-巯基丙酸法检测金属内酰胺酶比EDTA法更有效。尤其关注肠杆菌科的杆菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信