Measurement of occlusion of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen by intervertebral disc bulge

Mathieu Cuchanski BS , Daniel Cook MS , Donald M. Whiting MD , Boyle C. Cheng PhD
{"title":"Measurement of occlusion of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen by intervertebral disc bulge","authors":"Mathieu Cuchanski BS ,&nbsp;Daniel Cook MS ,&nbsp;Donald M. Whiting MD ,&nbsp;Boyle C. Cheng PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.esas.2010.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Disc protrusion has been proposed to be a possible cause of both pain and stenosis in the lower spine. No previous study has described the amount of disc occlusion of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen that occurs under different loading conditions. The objective of this study was to quantitatively assess the percent occlusion of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen by disc bulge under different loading conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Spinal canal depth and foraminal width were measured on computed tomography–scanned images of 7 human lumbar spine specimens. In vitro disc bulge measurements were completed by use of a previously described method in which single functional spinal units were subjected to 3 separate load protocols in a spine test machine and disc bulge was recorded with an optoelectric motion system that tracked active light-emitting diodes placed on the posterior and posterolateral aspects of the intervertebral disc. Occlusion was defined as percentage of encroachment into area of interest by maximum measured disc bulge at corresponding point of interest (the spinal canal is at the posterior point; the intervertebral foramen is at the posterolateral point).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean spinal canal depth and mean foraminal width were 19 ± 4 mm and 5 ± 2 mm, respectively. Mean spinal canal occlusion under a 250-N axial load, ± 2.5 Nm of flexion/extension, and ± 2.5 Nm of lateral bend was 2.5% ± 1.9%, 2.5% ± 1.6%, and 1.5% ± 0.8%, respectively. Mean intervertebral foramen occlusion under a 250-N axial load, ± 2.5 Nm of flexion/extension, and ± 2.5 Nm of lateral bend was 7.8% ± 4.7%, 9.5% ± 5.7%, and 11.3% ± 6.2%, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Percent occlusion of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen is dependent on magnitude and direction of load. Exiting neural elements at the location of the intervertebral foramen are the most vulnerable to impingement and generation of pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.esas.2010.09.004","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193598101000099X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background

Disc protrusion has been proposed to be a possible cause of both pain and stenosis in the lower spine. No previous study has described the amount of disc occlusion of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen that occurs under different loading conditions. The objective of this study was to quantitatively assess the percent occlusion of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen by disc bulge under different loading conditions.

Methods

Spinal canal depth and foraminal width were measured on computed tomography–scanned images of 7 human lumbar spine specimens. In vitro disc bulge measurements were completed by use of a previously described method in which single functional spinal units were subjected to 3 separate load protocols in a spine test machine and disc bulge was recorded with an optoelectric motion system that tracked active light-emitting diodes placed on the posterior and posterolateral aspects of the intervertebral disc. Occlusion was defined as percentage of encroachment into area of interest by maximum measured disc bulge at corresponding point of interest (the spinal canal is at the posterior point; the intervertebral foramen is at the posterolateral point).

Results

The mean spinal canal depth and mean foraminal width were 19 ± 4 mm and 5 ± 2 mm, respectively. Mean spinal canal occlusion under a 250-N axial load, ± 2.5 Nm of flexion/extension, and ± 2.5 Nm of lateral bend was 2.5% ± 1.9%, 2.5% ± 1.6%, and 1.5% ± 0.8%, respectively. Mean intervertebral foramen occlusion under a 250-N axial load, ± 2.5 Nm of flexion/extension, and ± 2.5 Nm of lateral bend was 7.8% ± 4.7%, 9.5% ± 5.7%, and 11.3% ± 6.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

Percent occlusion of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen is dependent on magnitude and direction of load. Exiting neural elements at the location of the intervertebral foramen are the most vulnerable to impingement and generation of pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

椎间盘突出测量椎管和椎间孔闭塞
背景:椎间盘突出被认为是下脊柱疼痛和狭窄的可能原因。以前没有研究描述不同负荷条件下椎管和椎间孔的椎间盘闭塞程度。本研究的目的是定量评估不同载荷条件下椎间盘突出对椎管和椎间孔阻塞的百分比。方法对7例腰椎标本进行计算机断层扫描,测量椎管深度和椎间孔宽度。体外椎间盘膨出测量通过使用先前描述的方法完成,其中单个功能脊柱单元在脊柱试验机中承受3个单独的负载方案,椎间盘膨出用光电运动系统记录,该系统跟踪放置在椎间盘后侧和后外侧的有源发光二极管。闭塞被定义为通过在相应的兴趣点测量到的最大椎间盘突出物侵入感兴趣区域的百分比(椎管在后点;椎间孔位于后外侧点)。结果平均椎管深度为19±4mm,平均椎间孔宽度为5±2mm。在250-N轴向载荷、±2.5 Nm屈伸和±2.5 Nm侧弯下,椎管闭塞的平均值分别为2.5%±1.9%、2.5%±1.6%和1.5%±0.8%。250-N轴向载荷、±2.5 Nm屈伸和±2.5 Nm侧弯下椎间孔闭塞的平均值分别为7.8%±4.7%、9.5%±5.7%和11.3%±6.2%。结论椎管和椎间孔的闭塞程度与负荷的大小和方向有关。椎间孔位置的神经元件是最容易受到撞击和产生疼痛的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信