Osteoconductive carriers for integrated bone repair

Timothy Ganey PhD , William Hutton DSc , Hans Jörg Meisel MD, PhD
{"title":"Osteoconductive carriers for integrated bone repair","authors":"Timothy Ganey PhD ,&nbsp;William Hutton DSc ,&nbsp;Hans Jörg Meisel MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.esas.2009.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Successful bone repair is judged in achieving restitution of space and mechanical integrity, and in regaining function. When the biology or anatomy are insufficient to attain a full repair, therapeutic use of graft material has been used to omit compliance features such as strain tolerance, reduced stiffness, and attenuated strength, and instead promote primary or membranous-type bone formation within the physical approximation of a graft material. The challenge of most conductive materials is that they emerge from a static platform and in placement force the living system to adapt to placement, dimension, different properties, and eventually are only successful in degradation and replacement, or in integration. The synergy and interdependency between adhesion, ECM, and proteolysis are important concepts that must be understood to engineer scaffolds capable of holding up to standards which are more than cell decoration. Moreover, the reactive specificity to loading, degradation, therapeutic delivery during absorption remains a key aim of both academic and industrial designs. Achieving conductivity comes with challenges of best fit integration, delivery, and in integrated modeling. The more liquid is the delivery, the more modular the components, and adaptive the matrix to meeting the intended application, the more likely that the conductivity will not be excluded by the morphology of the injury site. Considerations for osteoconductive materials for bone repair and replacement have developed conceptually and advanced parallel with a better understanding of not only bone biology but of materials science. First models of material replacements utilized a reductionist-constructionist logic; define the constituents of the material in terms of its morphology and chemical composition, and then engineer material with similar content and properties as a means of accommodating a replacement. Unfortunately for biologic systems, empiric formulation is insufficient to promote adequate integration in a timely fashion. Future matrices will need to translate their biological surfaces as more than a scaffold to be decorated with cells. Conductivity will be improved by formulations that enhance function, further extended from understanding what composition best suits cell attachment, and be adopted by conveniences of delivery that meet those criteria.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 108-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.esas.2009.09.006","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935981009000073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Successful bone repair is judged in achieving restitution of space and mechanical integrity, and in regaining function. When the biology or anatomy are insufficient to attain a full repair, therapeutic use of graft material has been used to omit compliance features such as strain tolerance, reduced stiffness, and attenuated strength, and instead promote primary or membranous-type bone formation within the physical approximation of a graft material. The challenge of most conductive materials is that they emerge from a static platform and in placement force the living system to adapt to placement, dimension, different properties, and eventually are only successful in degradation and replacement, or in integration. The synergy and interdependency between adhesion, ECM, and proteolysis are important concepts that must be understood to engineer scaffolds capable of holding up to standards which are more than cell decoration. Moreover, the reactive specificity to loading, degradation, therapeutic delivery during absorption remains a key aim of both academic and industrial designs. Achieving conductivity comes with challenges of best fit integration, delivery, and in integrated modeling. The more liquid is the delivery, the more modular the components, and adaptive the matrix to meeting the intended application, the more likely that the conductivity will not be excluded by the morphology of the injury site. Considerations for osteoconductive materials for bone repair and replacement have developed conceptually and advanced parallel with a better understanding of not only bone biology but of materials science. First models of material replacements utilized a reductionist-constructionist logic; define the constituents of the material in terms of its morphology and chemical composition, and then engineer material with similar content and properties as a means of accommodating a replacement. Unfortunately for biologic systems, empiric formulation is insufficient to promote adequate integration in a timely fashion. Future matrices will need to translate their biological surfaces as more than a scaffold to be decorated with cells. Conductivity will be improved by formulations that enhance function, further extended from understanding what composition best suits cell attachment, and be adopted by conveniences of delivery that meet those criteria.

骨综合修复的骨传导载体
成功的骨修复是通过恢复空间和机械完整性以及恢复功能来判断的。当生物学或解剖学不足以实现完全修复时,治疗性使用移植物材料来忽略顺应性特征,如应变耐受性,刚度降低和强度减弱,而是在移植物材料的物理近似范围内促进初级或膜型骨形成。大多数导电材料的挑战在于,它们从一个静态的平台中出现,在放置时迫使生命系统适应放置、尺寸、不同的特性,最终只能在降解和替换或集成中成功。粘附,ECM和蛋白水解之间的协同作用和相互依赖性是必须理解的重要概念,以设计能够维持标准的支架,而不仅仅是细胞装饰。此外,在吸收过程中对负载、降解、治疗递送的反应性特异性仍然是学术和工业设计的关键目标。实现导电性伴随着最佳配合集成、交付和集成建模的挑战。输送的液体越多,组件的模块化程度越高,基质的适应性越强以满足预期的应用,电导率就越有可能不会被损伤部位的形态所排除。随着对骨生物学和材料科学的更好理解,对骨修复和骨置换的骨传导材料的考虑在概念上得到了发展和进步。第一种材料替换模型采用了简化-建构主义逻辑;根据材料的形态和化学成分定义材料的成分,然后设计具有相似含量和性能的材料,作为容纳替代品的手段。不幸的是,对于生物系统来说,经验公式不足以及时促进充分的整合。未来的基质需要将其生物表面转化为不仅仅是用来装饰细胞的支架。电导率将通过增强功能的配方来提高,进一步从了解最适合细胞附着的组合物扩展,并通过满足这些标准的输送便利来采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信