Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement

Burkhard Rischke MD, PhD , Raymond S. Ross MD , Boris A. Jollenbeck MD , Kari B. Zimmers BS , Neal D. Defibaugh BS
{"title":"Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement","authors":"Burkhard Rischke MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Raymond S. Ross MD ,&nbsp;Boris A. Jollenbeck MD ,&nbsp;Kari B. Zimmers BS ,&nbsp;Neal D. Defibaugh BS","doi":"10.1016/j.esas.2011.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to describe the mechanical durability and the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a viscoelastic total disc replacement (VTDR). The human intervertebral disc is a complex, viscoelastic structure, permitting and constraining motion in 3 axes, thus providing stability. The ideal disc replacement should be viscoelastic and deformable in all directions, and it should restore disc height and angle.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Mechanical testing was conducted to validate the durability of the VTDR, and a clinical study was conducted to evaluate safety and performance. Fifty patients with single-level, symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease at L4-5 or L5-S1 were enrolled in a clinical trial at 3 European sites. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically for 2 years by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a visual analog scale (VAS), and independent radiographic analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The VTDR showed a fatigue life in excess of 50 million cycles (50-year equivalent) and a physiologically appropriate level of stiffness, motion, geometry, and viscoelasticity. We enrolled 28 men and 22 women in the clinical study, with a mean age of 40 years. Independent quantitative radiographic assessment indicated that the VTDR restored and maintained disc height and lordosis while providing physiologic motion. Mean ODI scores decreased from 48% preoperatively to 23% at 2 years' follow-up. Mean VAS low-back pain scores decreased from 7.1 cm to 2.9 cm. Median scores indicated that half of the patient population had ODI scores below 10% and VAS low-back pain scores below 0.95 cm at 2 years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The VTDR has excellent durability and performs clinically and radiographically as intended for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>The VTDR is intended to restore healthy anatomic properties and stability characteristics to the spinal segment. This study is the first to evaluate a VTDR in a 50-patient, multicenter European study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 97-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.esas.2011.08.001","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935981011000752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study is to describe the mechanical durability and the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a viscoelastic total disc replacement (VTDR). The human intervertebral disc is a complex, viscoelastic structure, permitting and constraining motion in 3 axes, thus providing stability. The ideal disc replacement should be viscoelastic and deformable in all directions, and it should restore disc height and angle.

Methods

Mechanical testing was conducted to validate the durability of the VTDR, and a clinical study was conducted to evaluate safety and performance. Fifty patients with single-level, symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease at L4-5 or L5-S1 were enrolled in a clinical trial at 3 European sites. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically for 2 years by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a visual analog scale (VAS), and independent radiographic analyses.

Results

The VTDR showed a fatigue life in excess of 50 million cycles (50-year equivalent) and a physiologically appropriate level of stiffness, motion, geometry, and viscoelasticity. We enrolled 28 men and 22 women in the clinical study, with a mean age of 40 years. Independent quantitative radiographic assessment indicated that the VTDR restored and maintained disc height and lordosis while providing physiologic motion. Mean ODI scores decreased from 48% preoperatively to 23% at 2 years' follow-up. Mean VAS low-back pain scores decreased from 7.1 cm to 2.9 cm. Median scores indicated that half of the patient population had ODI scores below 10% and VAS low-back pain scores below 0.95 cm at 2 years.

Conclusions

The VTDR has excellent durability and performs clinically and radiographically as intended for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease.

Clinical Relevance

The VTDR is intended to restore healthy anatomic properties and stability characteristics to the spinal segment. This study is the first to evaluate a VTDR in a 50-patient, multicenter European study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

粘弹性全椎间盘置换术的临床前和临床经验
本研究的目的是描述粘弹性全椎间盘置换术(VTDR)的机械耐久性和临床和影像学结果。人的椎间盘是一个复杂的粘弹性结构,允许和限制三轴运动,从而提供稳定性。理想的椎间盘置换应是粘弹性的,可全方位变形,并应恢复椎间盘高度和角度。方法通过力学试验验证VTDR的耐久性,并通过临床研究对其安全性和性能进行评价。50例L4-5或L5-S1单级别症状性腰椎间盘退行性疾病患者参加了欧洲3个地点的临床试验。通过Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和独立放射学分析对患者进行2年的临床和放射学评估。结果VTDR的疲劳寿命超过5000万次(相当于50年),并且具有生理上适当的刚度、运动、几何和粘弹性水平。我们在临床研究中招募了28名男性和22名女性,平均年龄为40岁。独立的定量影像学评估表明,VTDR恢复并维持了椎间盘高度和前凸,同时提供了生理运动。平均ODI评分从术前的48%下降到2年随访时的23%。VAS腰痛平均评分从7.1 cm降至2.9 cm。中位评分显示,半数患者2年时ODI评分低于10%,VAS腰痛评分低于0.95 cm。结论VTDR具有良好的耐用性,在临床和影像学上可用于治疗有症状的腰椎间盘退行性疾病。VTDR旨在恢复脊柱节段的健康解剖特性和稳定性特征。这项研究是首次在一项50例患者、多中心的欧洲研究中评估VTDR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信