100 consecutive cases of degenerative lumbar conditions using a non-threaded locking screw system with a 90-degree locking cap.

SAS journal Pub Date : 2009-03-01 eCollection Date: 2009-01-01 DOI:10.1016/SASJ-2008-0022-RR
Paul C McAfee, Bryan W Cunningham, P Justin Tortolani, Ira L Fedder, John C Sefter, Charles Davis
{"title":"100 consecutive cases of degenerative lumbar conditions using a non-threaded locking screw system with a 90-degree locking cap.","authors":"Paul C McAfee,&nbsp;Bryan W Cunningham,&nbsp;P Justin Tortolani,&nbsp;Ira L Fedder,&nbsp;John C Sefter,&nbsp;Charles Davis","doi":"10.1016/SASJ-2008-0022-RR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This prospective study analyzes the perioperative outcomes and long-term fusion success of 100 consecutive lumbar degenerative cases. The cases were managed using a non-threaded locking screw system, in conjunction with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages, for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) procedures. These 100 cases were compared to another prospective study treating patients with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria using conventional plate-based pedicle screw spinal instrumentation augmented with carbon fiber interbody cages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 167 operative levels were treated in 100 patients (51 single-level, 39 two-level and 10 three-level cases). Eleven cases were revisions and 67 patients received interbody fusion cages. Patients had an average of 22.8 ± 4.0 months followup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was one instrumentation failure but no significant subsidence at the interbody fusion level. The disc space height was restored as part of the surgical procedure at the interbody cage levels: from 7.5 ± 2.3 mm preoperative to 9.0 ± 2.1 mm postoperative. There were 2 cases of pseudarthrosis (2 / 100 = 2%). The average operative time for 1-level cases was 111 ± 25 minutes; for 2-level cases it was 132.4 ± 21.8 minutes; and for 3-level cases it was 162.6 ± 33 minutes. Blood loss averaged 800 ± 473 cc for 1-level cases, 1055 ± 408 cc for 2 levels, and 1155 ± 714 cc for 3 levels. The length of stay was similar between the 3 groups (4.4 ± 1.2 days for single-level cases, 4.7 ± 1.1 for 2 levels, and 5.0 ± 1.1 for 3 levels; P > .05). There were 3 incidental durotomies, and 4 other patients developed infections postoperatively that required reoperation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The disc and foraminal heights can be restored and maintained with a unilateral cage and pedicle screw construct. Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a PEEK cage combined with a non-threaded locking pedicle screw and rod system results in similar fusion rates to those achieved using the bilateral Brantigan interbody fusion cage or a single BAK Vista implant. When compared to the bilateral Brantigan cages, decreased operative time (P < .001), decreased blood loss (P < .001) and reduced incidence of dural tears (P < .001) are advantages of using a non-threaded locking screw system and single PEEK interbody cage for lumbar degenerative conditions without compromising subsequent fusion rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bb/de/SAS-3-2008-0022-RR.PMC4365587.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0022-RR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This prospective study analyzes the perioperative outcomes and long-term fusion success of 100 consecutive lumbar degenerative cases. The cases were managed using a non-threaded locking screw system, in conjunction with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages, for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) procedures. These 100 cases were compared to another prospective study treating patients with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria using conventional plate-based pedicle screw spinal instrumentation augmented with carbon fiber interbody cages.

Methods: A total of 167 operative levels were treated in 100 patients (51 single-level, 39 two-level and 10 three-level cases). Eleven cases were revisions and 67 patients received interbody fusion cages. Patients had an average of 22.8 ± 4.0 months followup.

Results: There was one instrumentation failure but no significant subsidence at the interbody fusion level. The disc space height was restored as part of the surgical procedure at the interbody cage levels: from 7.5 ± 2.3 mm preoperative to 9.0 ± 2.1 mm postoperative. There were 2 cases of pseudarthrosis (2 / 100 = 2%). The average operative time for 1-level cases was 111 ± 25 minutes; for 2-level cases it was 132.4 ± 21.8 minutes; and for 3-level cases it was 162.6 ± 33 minutes. Blood loss averaged 800 ± 473 cc for 1-level cases, 1055 ± 408 cc for 2 levels, and 1155 ± 714 cc for 3 levels. The length of stay was similar between the 3 groups (4.4 ± 1.2 days for single-level cases, 4.7 ± 1.1 for 2 levels, and 5.0 ± 1.1 for 3 levels; P > .05). There were 3 incidental durotomies, and 4 other patients developed infections postoperatively that required reoperation.

Conclusion: The disc and foraminal heights can be restored and maintained with a unilateral cage and pedicle screw construct. Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a PEEK cage combined with a non-threaded locking pedicle screw and rod system results in similar fusion rates to those achieved using the bilateral Brantigan interbody fusion cage or a single BAK Vista implant. When compared to the bilateral Brantigan cages, decreased operative time (P < .001), decreased blood loss (P < .001) and reduced incidence of dural tears (P < .001) are advantages of using a non-threaded locking screw system and single PEEK interbody cage for lumbar degenerative conditions without compromising subsequent fusion rates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用带90度锁定帽的无螺纹锁定螺钉系统连续100例腰椎退行性疾病。
背景:本前瞻性研究分析了100例连续腰椎退变病例的围手术期结果和长期融合成功率。这些病例采用无螺纹锁定螺钉系统,并结合聚醚醚酮(PEEK)笼进行后路腰椎椎体间融合(PLIF)手术。将这100例病例与另一项前瞻性研究进行比较,该研究使用传统的基于钢板的椎弓根螺钉脊柱内固定和碳纤维椎体间固定器,采用相同的纳入和排除标准。方法:100例患者共167个手术节段(单节段51例,二节段39例,三节段10例)。11例进行了翻修,67例接受了椎间融合器。患者平均随访22.8±4.0个月。结果:有一例内固定失败,但在椎体间融合水平无明显下沉。椎间盘间隙高度作为手术的一部分在椎间笼水平恢复:从术前的7.5±2.3 mm到术后的9.0±2.1 mm。假关节2例(2 / 100 = 2%)。1级病例平均手术时间为111±25分钟;2级病例为132.4±21.8分钟;三级病例为162.6±33分钟。1级患者平均失血量800±473 cc, 2级患者平均失血量1055±408 cc, 3级患者平均失血量1155±714 cc。3组住院时间相似(单级4.4±1.2 d, 2级4.7±1.1 d, 3级5.0±1.1 d);P > 0.05)。有3例意外硬膜切开术,另外4例术后发生感染,需要再次手术。结论:单侧椎弓根螺钉和椎弓根螺钉可以恢复和保持椎间盘和椎间孔高度。单侧经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合使用PEEK保持器结合无螺纹锁定椎弓根螺钉和棒系统,其融合率与使用双侧Brantigan椎间融合保持器或单个BAK Vista植入物所达到的融合率相似。与双侧Brantigan保持器相比,使用无螺钉锁定螺钉系统和单PEEK椎间保持器治疗腰椎退行性疾病的优点是手术时间缩短(P < 0.001)、出血量减少(P < 0.001)和硬脑膜撕裂发生率降低(P < 0.001),而不会影响随后的融合率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信