Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement

Mohamed Habib MSc , Hassan Serhan PhD , Connie Marchek MSc , Gamal Baroud PhD
{"title":"Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement","authors":"Mohamed Habib MSc ,&nbsp;Hassan Serhan PhD ,&nbsp;Connie Marchek MSc ,&nbsp;Gamal Baroud PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Vertebral augmentation has recently evolved as a medical procedure for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, the most common type of skeletal fractures related to osteoporosis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study compared the cement leakage and filling behavior of 2 existing delivery systems (Confidence and Vertebroplastic; DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA). The Confidence system with the high viscosity cement has been recently introduced in an attempt to curtail cement leakage.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The comparison was performed using an established benchmark model wherein the cement leakage, filling behavior can be assessed. A double-conduit introducer needle was used to deliver the cement and to measure the intravertebral pressure while delivering the cement. There were 5 experimental groups in this study: 3 low-viscosity groups, whose cement was injected at 3.5, 6.5, and 9.5 minutes after admixing the powder and monomer, and 2 high-viscosity groups injected at 3.5 and 6.5 minutes. The mass of leaked cement generally decreased with delaying the start of the injection. Specifically, for the low-viscosity, the average smallest leakage mass obtained was 2.6 ± 1.2g when the cement was delivered at 9.5 minutes. If delivered after 3.5 minutes, the mass of cement leak was 4.0 ± 1.2g. The high-viscosity system has showed improved results in curtailing cement leakage, as compared to low-viscosity. Specifically, if injected after 3.5 and 6.5 minutes, the cement leakage amounts were 1.5 ± 1.2g and 0.92 ± 0.6g, respectively. Similarly, the uniformity of cement filling increased when the delivery was delayed and when the high-viscosity system was applied. Furthermore, there were no significance changes in the intravertebral pressures between the low- and high-viscous groups. No correlation between the leakage mass and the IV pressures was noted.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The cement thickness and timing of delivery are key in controlling the intravertebral cement filling and physician may want to explore the use of low- or high-viscous cement for different fractures. The thickness of the cement has no significant impact on the intravertebral pressures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 26-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.001","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935981010000034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background

Vertebral augmentation has recently evolved as a medical procedure for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, the most common type of skeletal fractures related to osteoporosis.

Methods

This study compared the cement leakage and filling behavior of 2 existing delivery systems (Confidence and Vertebroplastic; DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA). The Confidence system with the high viscosity cement has been recently introduced in an attempt to curtail cement leakage.

Results

The comparison was performed using an established benchmark model wherein the cement leakage, filling behavior can be assessed. A double-conduit introducer needle was used to deliver the cement and to measure the intravertebral pressure while delivering the cement. There were 5 experimental groups in this study: 3 low-viscosity groups, whose cement was injected at 3.5, 6.5, and 9.5 minutes after admixing the powder and monomer, and 2 high-viscosity groups injected at 3.5 and 6.5 minutes. The mass of leaked cement generally decreased with delaying the start of the injection. Specifically, for the low-viscosity, the average smallest leakage mass obtained was 2.6 ± 1.2g when the cement was delivered at 9.5 minutes. If delivered after 3.5 minutes, the mass of cement leak was 4.0 ± 1.2g. The high-viscosity system has showed improved results in curtailing cement leakage, as compared to low-viscosity. Specifically, if injected after 3.5 and 6.5 minutes, the cement leakage amounts were 1.5 ± 1.2g and 0.92 ± 0.6g, respectively. Similarly, the uniformity of cement filling increased when the delivery was delayed and when the high-viscosity system was applied. Furthermore, there were no significance changes in the intravertebral pressures between the low- and high-viscous groups. No correlation between the leakage mass and the IV pressures was noted.

Conclusion

The cement thickness and timing of delivery are key in controlling the intravertebral cement filling and physician may want to explore the use of low- or high-viscous cement for different fractures. The thickness of the cement has no significant impact on the intravertebral pressures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

低黏度椎体塑性水泥与高黏度置信度水泥的渗漏与充填模式研究
椎体增强术最近发展成为一种治疗椎体压缩性骨折的医疗程序,这是与骨质疏松症相关的最常见的骨骼骨折类型。方法本研究比较了两种现有给药系统(Confidence和Vertebroplastic;马塞诸塞州雷纳姆市副市长)。为了减少水泥泄漏,最近引入了具有高粘度水泥的Confidence系统。结果采用已建立的基准模型进行对比,可以对水泥渗漏、充填行为进行评估。使用双导管引入针输送骨水泥,并在输送骨水泥时测量椎内压力。本研究共设5个实验组:3个低粘度组,分别在粉末与单体混合后3.5、6.5、9.5分钟注射水泥;2个高粘度组,分别在3.5、6.5分钟注射水泥。泄漏水泥的质量一般随着注入开始时间的推迟而减少。具体而言,对于低粘度水泥,在9.5分钟交付水泥时,平均最小泄漏质量为2.6±1.2g。3.5分钟后交货,水泥漏质量为4.0±1.2g。与低粘度体系相比,高粘度体系在减少水泥泄漏方面表现出了更好的效果。其中,3.5 min和6.5 min注射后,水泥渗漏量分别为1.5±1.2g和0.92±0.6g。同样,延迟交货和采用高粘度体系时,水泥充填均匀性也有所提高。此外,在低粘度组和高粘度组之间,椎内压力没有显著变化。泄漏质量与静脉压力之间没有相关性。结论骨水泥厚度和给药时机是控制椎体内骨水泥充填的关键,针对不同的骨折情况,应探索使用低或高黏度骨水泥。骨水泥的厚度对椎体内压力无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信