Retrieval analysis of motion preserving spinal devices and periprosthetic tissues

Steven M. Kurtz PhD , Marla Steinbeck PhD , Allyson Ianuzzi PhD , André van Ooij MD , Ilona M. Punt , Jorge Isaza MD , E.R.S. Ross MD
{"title":"Retrieval analysis of motion preserving spinal devices and periprosthetic tissues","authors":"Steven M. Kurtz PhD ,&nbsp;Marla Steinbeck PhD ,&nbsp;Allyson Ianuzzi PhD ,&nbsp;André van Ooij MD ,&nbsp;Ilona M. Punt ,&nbsp;Jorge Isaza MD ,&nbsp;E.R.S. Ross MD","doi":"10.1016/j.esas.2009.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article reviews certain practical aspects of retrieval analysis for motion preserving spinal implants and periprosthetic tissues as an essential component of the overall revision strategy for these implants. At our institution, we established an international repository for motion-preserving spine implants in 2004. Our repository is currently open to all spine surgeons, and is intended to be inclusive of all cervical and lumbar implant designs such as artificial discs and posterior dynamic stabilization devices. Although a wide range of alternative materials is being investigated for nonfusion spine implants, many of the examples in this review are drawn from our existing repository of metal-on-polyethylene, metal-on-metal lumbar total disc replacements (TDRs), and polyurethane-based dynamic motion preservation devices. These devices are already approved or nearing approval for use in the United States, and hence are the most clinically relevant at the present time. This article summarizes the current literature on the retrieval analysis of these implants and concludes with recommendations for the development of new test methods that are based on the current state of knowledge of in vivo wear and damage mechanisms. Furthermore, the relevance and need to evaluate the surrounding tissue to obtain a complete understanding of the biological reaction to implant component corrosion and wear is reviewed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 161-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.esas.2009.11.003","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935981009000346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

This article reviews certain practical aspects of retrieval analysis for motion preserving spinal implants and periprosthetic tissues as an essential component of the overall revision strategy for these implants. At our institution, we established an international repository for motion-preserving spine implants in 2004. Our repository is currently open to all spine surgeons, and is intended to be inclusive of all cervical and lumbar implant designs such as artificial discs and posterior dynamic stabilization devices. Although a wide range of alternative materials is being investigated for nonfusion spine implants, many of the examples in this review are drawn from our existing repository of metal-on-polyethylene, metal-on-metal lumbar total disc replacements (TDRs), and polyurethane-based dynamic motion preservation devices. These devices are already approved or nearing approval for use in the United States, and hence are the most clinically relevant at the present time. This article summarizes the current literature on the retrieval analysis of these implants and concludes with recommendations for the development of new test methods that are based on the current state of knowledge of in vivo wear and damage mechanisms. Furthermore, the relevance and need to evaluate the surrounding tissue to obtain a complete understanding of the biological reaction to implant component corrosion and wear is reviewed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

保持运动的脊柱装置和假体周围组织的检索分析
本文回顾了保留运动的脊柱植入物和假体周围组织作为这些植入物整体翻修策略的重要组成部分的检索分析的某些实际方面。在我们的机构,我们于2004年建立了一个保持运动的脊柱植入物的国际存储库。我们的存储库目前向所有脊柱外科医生开放,旨在包括所有颈椎和腰椎植入物设计,如人工椎间盘和后路动态稳定装置。尽管人们正在研究用于非融合脊柱植入物的各种替代材料,但本综述中的许多例子都来自于我们现有的金属对聚乙烯、金属对金属腰椎全椎间盘置换术(tdr)和基于聚氨酯的动态运动保持装置。这些设备在美国已经批准或即将批准使用,因此是目前最具临床相关性的。本文总结了目前关于这些植入物的检索分析的文献,并基于体内磨损和损伤机制的现有知识,对开发新的测试方法提出了建议。此外,评估周围组织的相关性和必要性,以获得对种植体部件腐蚀和磨损的生物反应的完整理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信