Trial of tramadol plus gabapentin for opioid detoxification.

IF 0.4 4区 医学
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal Pub Date : 2014-12-29 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.5812/ircmj.18202
Hassan Ziaaddini, Ahmad Ziaaddini, Neda Asghari, Nozar Nakhaee, Mahin Eslami
{"title":"Trial of tramadol plus gabapentin for opioid detoxification.","authors":"Hassan Ziaaddini,&nbsp;Ahmad Ziaaddini,&nbsp;Neda Asghari,&nbsp;Nozar Nakhaee,&nbsp;Mahin Eslami","doi":"10.5812/ircmj.18202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substance abuse or drug addiction is one of the most important health issues in every society, which can lead to physical and mental problems.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy of tramadol plus gabapentin versus methadone use in the treatment of opiate withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Consenting male subjects who fulfilled the DSM-4 criteria for opiate dependence syndrome (opium, residue, and heroin) were randomly assigned in two groups to receive tramadol plus gabapentin or methadone. Assessment tools were Adjective Rating Scale for Withdrawal (ARSW), Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) and Visual Analogue craving Scale (VAS). Fifty-nine subjects were enrolled and evaluated on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 during their 10 days of admission. Twenty-nine participants received methadone and the other 30 received tramadol plus gabapentin for their treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean (SD) age of the patients in methadone group and tramadol plus gabapentin group were 33.9 (7.1) and 32.4. (8.1), respectively (P = 0.462). The overall ARSW (P value = 0.263) and COWS (P = 0.862) scores between the two groups were comparable. The differences in the VAS score for craving between the two groups was marginally significant (P = 0.057). The highest VAS score was at the third day of admission in both groups and it was generally higher in methadone group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The severity of withdrawal syndrome in two groups was not significantly different. The craving was higher in the group receiving methadone from the second day of admission even though the usage amount was higher in the tramadol plus gabapentin group. The findings of this study suggest that the combination of tramadol plus gabapentin is an efficient method for opioid detoxification.</p>","PeriodicalId":14628,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2d/e2/ircmj-17-01-18202.PMC4341495.pdf","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.18202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background: Substance abuse or drug addiction is one of the most important health issues in every society, which can lead to physical and mental problems.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of tramadol plus gabapentin versus methadone use in the treatment of opiate withdrawal.

Patients and methods: Consenting male subjects who fulfilled the DSM-4 criteria for opiate dependence syndrome (opium, residue, and heroin) were randomly assigned in two groups to receive tramadol plus gabapentin or methadone. Assessment tools were Adjective Rating Scale for Withdrawal (ARSW), Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) and Visual Analogue craving Scale (VAS). Fifty-nine subjects were enrolled and evaluated on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 during their 10 days of admission. Twenty-nine participants received methadone and the other 30 received tramadol plus gabapentin for their treatment.

Results: Mean (SD) age of the patients in methadone group and tramadol plus gabapentin group were 33.9 (7.1) and 32.4. (8.1), respectively (P = 0.462). The overall ARSW (P value = 0.263) and COWS (P = 0.862) scores between the two groups were comparable. The differences in the VAS score for craving between the two groups was marginally significant (P = 0.057). The highest VAS score was at the third day of admission in both groups and it was generally higher in methadone group.

Conclusions: The severity of withdrawal syndrome in two groups was not significantly different. The craving was higher in the group receiving methadone from the second day of admission even though the usage amount was higher in the tramadol plus gabapentin group. The findings of this study suggest that the combination of tramadol plus gabapentin is an efficient method for opioid detoxification.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

曲马多联合加巴喷丁治疗阿片类药物解毒的试验。
背景:物质滥用或药物成瘾是每个社会中最重要的健康问题之一,它可能导致身体和精神问题。目的:本研究旨在比较曲马多联合加巴喷丁与美沙酮治疗阿片类戒断的疗效。患者和方法:符合DSM-4阿片依赖综合征(鸦片、鸦片残留和海洛因)标准的男性受试者自愿同意,随机分为两组,分别接受曲马多加巴喷丁或美沙酮治疗。评估工具为戒断形容词评定量表(ARSW)、临床阿片戒断量表(COWS)和视觉模拟渴求量表(VAS)。59名受试者入组,并在入院10天的第1、2、3、4、6和8天进行评估。29名参与者接受美沙酮治疗,另外30名接受曲马多加巴喷丁治疗。结果:美沙酮组和曲马多加巴喷丁组患者的平均(SD)年龄分别为33.9岁(7.1岁)和32.4岁。(8.1) (P = 0.462)。两组患者ARSW总分(P值= 0.263)和COWS总分(P = 0.862)具有可比性。两组间渴求VAS评分差异有统计学意义(P = 0.057)。两组患者VAS评分均在入院第3天达到最高,美沙酮组VAS评分普遍较高。结论:两组患者戒断综合征的严重程度无显著差异。从入院第二天起,接受美沙酮治疗组的渴望程度更高,尽管曲马多加巴喷丁组的使用量更高。本研究结果提示曲马多联合加巴喷丁是一种有效的阿片类药物解毒方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal dealing with general Medicine and Surgery, Disaster Medicine and Health Policy. It is an official Journal of the Iranian Hospital Dubai and is published monthly. The Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal aims at publishing the high quality materials, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Medicine and Surgery
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信