Point-of-Care HbA1c Testing with the A1cNow Test Kit in General Practice Dental Clinics: A Pilot Study Involving Its Accuracy and Practical Issues in Its Use.

Q3 Nursing
Shiela M Strauss, Mary Rosedale, Michael A Pesce, Caroline Juterbock, Navjot Kaur, Joe DePaola, Deborah Goetz, Mark S Wolff, Dolores Malaspina, Ann Danoff
{"title":"Point-of-Care HbA1c Testing with the A1cNow Test Kit in General Practice Dental Clinics: A Pilot Study Involving Its Accuracy and Practical Issues in Its Use.","authors":"Shiela M Strauss, Mary Rosedale, Michael A Pesce, Caroline Juterbock, Navjot Kaur, Joe DePaola, Deborah Goetz, Mark S Wolff, Dolores Malaspina, Ann Danoff","doi":"10.1097/POC.0000000000000039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With millions of at-risk people undiagnosed with pre-diabetes and diabetes, there is a need to identify alternate screening sites for out-of-range glucose values. We examined practical issues and accuracy (relative to High Performance Liquid Chromatography testing in a laboratory) in the use of the A1cNow point of care device for this screening in general practice dental clinics at a large University-based Dental College. Health care professionals obtained evaluable readings for only 70% of the subjects, even after two attempts, and its use according to manufacturer's instructions was often challenging in the busy environment of the dental clinic. At thresholds for pre-diabetes and diabetes established by the American Diabetes Association, sensitivities of the A1cNow kit relative to the HPLC method were 91.9% and 100%, respectively. However, specificities for pre-diabetes and diabetes were 66.7% and 82.4%, respectively, indicating many false positive results. A better strategy for diabetes screening may involve a laboratory-based analysis approach that is patient- and provider-friendly, with minimal burden to the dental team.</p>","PeriodicalId":44085,"journal":{"name":"Point of Care","volume":"13 4","pages":"142-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4290166/pdf/nihms-619753.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Point of Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With millions of at-risk people undiagnosed with pre-diabetes and diabetes, there is a need to identify alternate screening sites for out-of-range glucose values. We examined practical issues and accuracy (relative to High Performance Liquid Chromatography testing in a laboratory) in the use of the A1cNow point of care device for this screening in general practice dental clinics at a large University-based Dental College. Health care professionals obtained evaluable readings for only 70% of the subjects, even after two attempts, and its use according to manufacturer's instructions was often challenging in the busy environment of the dental clinic. At thresholds for pre-diabetes and diabetes established by the American Diabetes Association, sensitivities of the A1cNow kit relative to the HPLC method were 91.9% and 100%, respectively. However, specificities for pre-diabetes and diabetes were 66.7% and 82.4%, respectively, indicating many false positive results. A better strategy for diabetes screening may involve a laboratory-based analysis approach that is patient- and provider-friendly, with minimal burden to the dental team.

Abstract Image

在全科牙科诊所使用 A1cNow 检测试剂盒进行护理点 HbA1c 检测:有关其准确性和使用中的实际问题的试点研究。
由于数百万高危人群未被确诊为糖尿病前期和糖尿病,因此有必要为超出范围的血糖值确定替代筛查地点。我们研究了在一所大型大学牙科学院的全科牙科诊所使用 A1cNow 护理点设备进行筛查的实际问题和准确性(相对于实验室的高效液相色谱检测)。即使经过两次尝试,医护人员也只能为 70% 的受试者获得可评估的读数,而且在牙科诊所繁忙的环境中,按照制造商的说明使用该设备往往具有挑战性。在美国糖尿病协会确定的糖尿病前期和糖尿病阈值下,A1cNow 套件相对于 HPLC 方法的灵敏度分别为 91.9% 和 100%。然而,糖尿病前期和糖尿病的特异性分别为 66.7% 和 82.4%,表明有很多假阳性结果。更好的糖尿病筛查策略可能是采用一种基于实验室的分析方法,这种方法对患者和医疗服务提供者都很友好,对牙科团队的负担也最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Point of Care
Point of Care MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology is a vital resource for directors and managers of large and small hospital pathology labs, blood centers, home health-care agencies, doctors" offices, and other healthcare facilities. Each issue brings you peer-reviewed original research articles, along with concepts, technologies and trends, covering topics that include: Test accuracy Turnaround time Data management Quality control Regulatory compliance Cost-effectiveness of testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信