Practice Guideline Recommendations on Perioperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.

IF 4.1
Eva Lambert, Sharon Carey
{"title":"Practice Guideline Recommendations on Perioperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Eva Lambert, Sharon Carey","doi":"10.1177/0148607114567713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditionally, perioperative fasting consisted of being nil by mouth (NBM) from midnight before surgery and fasting postoperatively until recovery of bowel function. These outdated practices persist despite emerging evidence revealing that excessive fasting results in negative outcomes and delayed recovery. Various evidence-based, multimodal, enhanced recovery protocols incorporating minimized perioperative fasting have arisen to improve patient outcomes and streamline recovery, but implementation remains limited. This article aims to review current fasting guidelines, assess their quality, summarize relevant recommendations, and identify gaps in evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search of Medline and CINAHL and a manual search of relevant websites identified guidelines containing suitable grading systems and fasting recommendations. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) tool. Grading systems were standardized to the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition format and recommendations summarized based on grading and guideline quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen guidelines were included. Rigor of development scores ranged from 29%-95%, with only 8 guidelines explicitly declaring the use of systematic methodology. Applicability scores were lowest, averaging 32%. Ten recommendation types were extracted and summarized. Strong and consistent evidence exists for the minimization of perioperative fasting, for a 2-hour preoperative fast after clear fluids, and for early recommencement of oral food and fluid intake postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This article presents several high-level recommendations ready for immediate implementation, while poorly graded and inconsistent recommendations reveal key areas for future research. Meanwhile, guideline quality requires improvement, especially regarding rigor of development and applicability, through systematic methodology, reporting transparency, and implementation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520701,"journal":{"name":"JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1158-1165"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607114567713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditionally, perioperative fasting consisted of being nil by mouth (NBM) from midnight before surgery and fasting postoperatively until recovery of bowel function. These outdated practices persist despite emerging evidence revealing that excessive fasting results in negative outcomes and delayed recovery. Various evidence-based, multimodal, enhanced recovery protocols incorporating minimized perioperative fasting have arisen to improve patient outcomes and streamline recovery, but implementation remains limited. This article aims to review current fasting guidelines, assess their quality, summarize relevant recommendations, and identify gaps in evidence.

Methods: A systematic literature search of Medline and CINAHL and a manual search of relevant websites identified guidelines containing suitable grading systems and fasting recommendations. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) tool. Grading systems were standardized to the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition format and recommendations summarized based on grading and guideline quality.

Results: Nineteen guidelines were included. Rigor of development scores ranged from 29%-95%, with only 8 guidelines explicitly declaring the use of systematic methodology. Applicability scores were lowest, averaging 32%. Ten recommendation types were extracted and summarized. Strong and consistent evidence exists for the minimization of perioperative fasting, for a 2-hour preoperative fast after clear fluids, and for early recommencement of oral food and fluid intake postoperatively.

Conclusions: This article presents several high-level recommendations ready for immediate implementation, while poorly graded and inconsistent recommendations reveal key areas for future research. Meanwhile, guideline quality requires improvement, especially regarding rigor of development and applicability, through systematic methodology, reporting transparency, and implementation strategies.

围手术期禁食的实践指南建议:一项系统综述。
背景:传统上,围手术期禁食包括从术前午夜开始口服零(NBM)和术后禁食直到肠功能恢复。尽管新出现的证据表明过度禁食会导致负面结果和延迟恢复,但这些过时的做法仍然存在。各种以证据为基础的、多模式的、增强的康复方案已经出现,其中包括尽量减少围手术期禁食,以改善患者的预后和简化康复,但实施仍然有限。本文旨在回顾当前的禁食指南,评估其质量,总结相关建议,并确定证据的差距。方法:对Medline和CINAHL进行系统的文献检索,并对相关网站进行人工检索,确定了包含合适分级系统和禁食建议的指南。使用指南研究和评估评估(AGREE)工具评估指南质量。分级系统按照美国肠外和肠内营养学会的格式进行标准化,并根据分级和指南质量总结建议。结果:共纳入19条指南。开发分数的严谨性在29%-95%之间,只有8个指导方针明确声明使用系统方法。适用性得分最低,平均为32%。提取并总结了10种推荐类型。有强有力和一致的证据表明,围手术期禁食、术前清液后禁食2小时、术后早期重新开始口服食物和液体摄入是必要的。结论:本文提出了一些可以立即实施的高水平建议,而评分较低和不一致的建议揭示了未来研究的关键领域。同时,指南的质量需要通过系统的方法、报告的透明度和实施策略来改进,特别是在制定的严谨性和适用性方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信