Novel Split Chest Tube Improves Post-Surgical Thoracic Drainage.

Albert H Olivencia-Yurvati, Brandon H Cherry, Hunaid A Gurji, Daniel W White, J Tyler Newton, Gary F Scott, Besim Hoxha, Terence Gourlay, Robert T Mallet
{"title":"Novel Split Chest Tube Improves Post-Surgical Thoracic Drainage.","authors":"Albert H Olivencia-Yurvati,&nbsp;Brandon H Cherry,&nbsp;Hunaid A Gurji,&nbsp;Daniel W White,&nbsp;J Tyler Newton,&nbsp;Gary F Scott,&nbsp;Besim Hoxha,&nbsp;Terence Gourlay,&nbsp;Robert T Mallet","doi":"10.4172/2155-9880.1000321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Conventional, separate mediastinal and pleural tubes are often inefficient at draining thoracic effusions.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>We developed a Y-shaped chest tube with split ends that divide within the thoracic cavity, permitting separate intrathoracic placement and requiring a single exit port. In this study, thoracic drainage by the split drain vs. that of separate drains was tested.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After sternotomy, pericardiotomy, and left pleurotomy, pigs were fitted with separate chest drains (n=10) or a split tube prototype (n=9) with internal openings positioned in the mediastinum and in the costo-diaphragmatic recess. Separate series of experiments were conducted to test drainage of D5W or 0.58 M sucrose, an aqueous solution with viscosity approximating that of plasma. One litre of fluid was infused into the thorax, and suction was applied at -20 cm H2O for 30 min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When D5W was infused, the split drain left a residual volume of 53 ± 99 ml (mean value ± SD) vs. 148 ± 120 for the separate drain (P=0.007), representing a drainage efficiency (i.e. drained vol/[drained + residual vol]) of 95 ± 10% vs. 86 ± 12% for the separate drains (P = 0.011). In the second series, the split drain evacuated more 0.58 M sucrose in the first minute (967 ± 129 ml) than the separate drains (680 ± 192 ml, P<0.001). By 30 min, the split drain evacuated a similar volume of sucrose vs. the conventional drain (1089 ± 72 vs. 1056 ± 78 ml; P = 0.5). Residual volume tended to be lower (25 ± 10 vs. 62 ± 72 ml; P = 0.128) and drainage efficiency tended to be higher (98 ± 1 vs. 95 ± 6%; P = 0.111) with the split drain vs. conventional separate drains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The split chest tube drained the thoracic cavity at least as effectively as conventional separate tubes. This new device could potentially alleviate postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":89581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical & experimental cardiology","volume":"5 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-9880.1000321","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical & experimental cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9880.1000321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Conventional, separate mediastinal and pleural tubes are often inefficient at draining thoracic effusions.

Description: We developed a Y-shaped chest tube with split ends that divide within the thoracic cavity, permitting separate intrathoracic placement and requiring a single exit port. In this study, thoracic drainage by the split drain vs. that of separate drains was tested.

Methods: After sternotomy, pericardiotomy, and left pleurotomy, pigs were fitted with separate chest drains (n=10) or a split tube prototype (n=9) with internal openings positioned in the mediastinum and in the costo-diaphragmatic recess. Separate series of experiments were conducted to test drainage of D5W or 0.58 M sucrose, an aqueous solution with viscosity approximating that of plasma. One litre of fluid was infused into the thorax, and suction was applied at -20 cm H2O for 30 min.

Results: When D5W was infused, the split drain left a residual volume of 53 ± 99 ml (mean value ± SD) vs. 148 ± 120 for the separate drain (P=0.007), representing a drainage efficiency (i.e. drained vol/[drained + residual vol]) of 95 ± 10% vs. 86 ± 12% for the separate drains (P = 0.011). In the second series, the split drain evacuated more 0.58 M sucrose in the first minute (967 ± 129 ml) than the separate drains (680 ± 192 ml, P<0.001). By 30 min, the split drain evacuated a similar volume of sucrose vs. the conventional drain (1089 ± 72 vs. 1056 ± 78 ml; P = 0.5). Residual volume tended to be lower (25 ± 10 vs. 62 ± 72 ml; P = 0.128) and drainage efficiency tended to be higher (98 ± 1 vs. 95 ± 6%; P = 0.111) with the split drain vs. conventional separate drains.

Conclusion: The split chest tube drained the thoracic cavity at least as effectively as conventional separate tubes. This new device could potentially alleviate postoperative complications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

新型开胸管改善术后胸腔引流。
目的:传统的胸腔和纵隔隔管引流胸腔积液效果不佳。描述:我们开发了一种y形胸管,其分叉端在胸腔内分开,允许单独的胸腔内放置,并且需要一个单独的出口。在本研究中,我们比较了劈开引流管与单独引流管的胸腔引流。方法:猪经胸骨切开、心包切开和左胸膜切开后,分别安装独立胸腔引流管(n=10)或分离式管原型(n=9),其内部开口位于纵隔和肋膈隐窝。分别进行了一系列实验,以测试D5W或0.58 M蔗糖(粘度接近等离子体的水溶液)的排水性。将1升液体注入胸腔,在-20 cm H2O下吸力30 min。结果:D5W输注时,分路引流管剩余容积为53±99 ml(平均值±SD),分路引流管剩余容积为148±120 ml (P=0.007),引流效率(即排出容积/[排出容积+剩余容积])为95±10%,分路引流管剩余容积为86±12% (P= 0.011)。在第二组病例中,劈开胸管第一分钟排出的蔗糖量(967±129 ml)比单独引流多0.58 M(680±192 ml)。结论:劈开胸管对胸腔的引流效果至少与常规单独引流相同。这种新装置有可能减轻术后并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信