An open-label pilot study of homeopathic treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and youth.

Forschende Komplementarmedizin Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-09-19 DOI:10.1159/000368137
David Brulé, Lauren Sule, Beth Landau-Halpern, Violeta Nastase, Umesh Jain, Sunita Vohra, Heather Boon
{"title":"An open-label pilot study of homeopathic treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and youth.","authors":"David Brulé,&nbsp;Lauren Sule,&nbsp;Beth Landau-Halpern,&nbsp;Violeta Nastase,&nbsp;Umesh Jain,&nbsp;Sunita Vohra,&nbsp;Heather Boon","doi":"10.1159/000368137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An open-label pilot study of individualized homeopathy for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was conducted to assess the potential for future studies with a focus on the feasibility of the recruitment plan and outcome measure schedules; identification of any group characteristics of participants who respond significantly to the therapy; and establishing the length of time required for an improvement in ADHD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Participants (aged 6-16) were recruited through community advertisement and outreach. Participants completed 1 screening and 9 individualized homeopathic follow-up consultations. ADHD symptoms were assessed using the Conners 3 - Parent Questionnaire administered at each consultation. The pre- and post-study difference in Conners Global Index - Parent (CGI-P) T-score was evaluated for each participant. Baseline data of those who showed a statistically significant improvement (responders) were compared to those who did not (non-responders).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>35 participants were enrolled over 11 months. 80% completed all 10 consultations in a median of 12.1 months. 63% had a statistically significant improvement in the primary outcome, first occurring after a mean of 4.5 visits. Overall scores for participants completing at least 2 data points decreased from a baseline median of 85.5 to 74.0 (p < 0.001, CI 95%). There were no significant baseline differences between responders and non-responders. No serious adverse events related to the therapy were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The change in the median CGI-P T-score from baseline to the end of this open-label pilot study was statistically significant. The research methods are feasible. Future studies are warranted.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT01141634.</p>","PeriodicalId":51049,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000368137","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000368137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: An open-label pilot study of individualized homeopathy for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was conducted to assess the potential for future studies with a focus on the feasibility of the recruitment plan and outcome measure schedules; identification of any group characteristics of participants who respond significantly to the therapy; and establishing the length of time required for an improvement in ADHD symptoms.

Patients and methods: Participants (aged 6-16) were recruited through community advertisement and outreach. Participants completed 1 screening and 9 individualized homeopathic follow-up consultations. ADHD symptoms were assessed using the Conners 3 - Parent Questionnaire administered at each consultation. The pre- and post-study difference in Conners Global Index - Parent (CGI-P) T-score was evaluated for each participant. Baseline data of those who showed a statistically significant improvement (responders) were compared to those who did not (non-responders).

Results: 35 participants were enrolled over 11 months. 80% completed all 10 consultations in a median of 12.1 months. 63% had a statistically significant improvement in the primary outcome, first occurring after a mean of 4.5 visits. Overall scores for participants completing at least 2 data points decreased from a baseline median of 85.5 to 74.0 (p < 0.001, CI 95%). There were no significant baseline differences between responders and non-responders. No serious adverse events related to the therapy were reported.

Conclusion: The change in the median CGI-P T-score from baseline to the end of this open-label pilot study was statistically significant. The research methods are feasible. Future studies are warranted.

Trial registration: NCT01141634.

儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的顺势疗法治疗的开放标签试点研究。
背景:进行了一项针对注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的个体化顺势疗法的开放标签试点研究,以评估未来研究的潜力,重点关注招募计划和结果测量时间表的可行性;确定对治疗有显著反应的参与者的任何群体特征;并确定改善ADHD症状所需的时间长度。患者和方法:通过社区广告和外展招募参与者(6-16岁)。参与者完成了1次筛查和9次个体化顺势疗法随访咨询。ADHD症状在每次咨询时使用Conners 3 - Parent Questionnaire进行评估。评估每个参与者的Conners Global Index - Parent (CGI-P) T-score在研究前和研究后的差异。基线数据显示有统计学显著改善的患者(应答者)与无应答者(无应答者)进行比较。结果:35名参与者在11个月的时间里被纳入研究。80%的患者在12.1个月的中位数时间内完成了所有10次咨询。63%的患者在主要结果上有统计学意义上的显著改善,首次出现在平均4.5次就诊后。完成至少2个数据点的参与者的总得分从基线中位数85.5下降到74.0 (p < 0.001, CI 95%)。在应答者和无应答者之间没有显著的基线差异。未见与治疗相关的严重不良事件的报道。结论:从基线到这项开放标签先导研究结束时,中位CGI-P t评分的变化具有统计学意义。研究方法是可行的。未来的研究是有必要的。试验注册:NCT01141634。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forschende Komplementarmedizin
Forschende Komplementarmedizin 医学-全科医学与补充医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信