Comparative surfactant reactivity of canine and human stratum corneum: a plea for the use of the corneosurfametry bioassay.

IF 3
V Goffin, J Fontaine, G E Piérard
{"title":"Comparative surfactant reactivity of canine and human stratum corneum: a plea for the use of the corneosurfametry bioassay.","authors":"V Goffin,&nbsp;J Fontaine,&nbsp;G E Piérard","doi":"10.1177/026119299902700108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparative dermatology has paid little attention to the physiopathology of the stratum corneum. In this study, we investigated the responses of human and canine horny layers to marketed animal wash products by using the corneosurfametry bioassay. Previous work has shown that, with increasing surfactant aggressiveness to the stratum corneum, the colorimetric index of mildness (CIM) decreases, while both the corneosurfametry index (CSMI) and the overall difference in corneosurfametry (ODC) increase. In the present study, stratum corneum reactivity to wash products and inter-individual variability were significantly higher in humans than in dogs. For the three corneosurfametry variables, linear correlations were found between data gathered in the two panel groups. In conclusion, this pilot study suggests that mean stratum corneum reactivity to surfactants is stronger in humans than in dogs. Inter-individual variation, indicative of sensitive skin, also appears to be broader in humans. As a consequence, data gathered from dogs by using the corneosurfametry bioassay cannot be extrapolated to humans. Such variation between species could be important in the assessment of product safety and in supporting claims for mildness. </p>","PeriodicalId":520549,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA","volume":" ","pages":"103-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/026119299902700108","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/026119299902700108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Comparative dermatology has paid little attention to the physiopathology of the stratum corneum. In this study, we investigated the responses of human and canine horny layers to marketed animal wash products by using the corneosurfametry bioassay. Previous work has shown that, with increasing surfactant aggressiveness to the stratum corneum, the colorimetric index of mildness (CIM) decreases, while both the corneosurfametry index (CSMI) and the overall difference in corneosurfametry (ODC) increase. In the present study, stratum corneum reactivity to wash products and inter-individual variability were significantly higher in humans than in dogs. For the three corneosurfametry variables, linear correlations were found between data gathered in the two panel groups. In conclusion, this pilot study suggests that mean stratum corneum reactivity to surfactants is stronger in humans than in dogs. Inter-individual variation, indicative of sensitive skin, also appears to be broader in humans. As a consequence, data gathered from dogs by using the corneosurfametry bioassay cannot be extrapolated to humans. Such variation between species could be important in the assessment of product safety and in supporting claims for mildness.

犬和人角质层表面活性剂反应性的比较:角质层表面测定法生物测定的应用。
比较皮肤病学很少关注角质层的生理病理。在这项研究中,我们用角质层表面测定法研究了人类和犬角质层对市售动物洗涤产品的反应。先前的研究表明,随着表面活性剂对角质层侵蚀性的增加,温和性比色指数(CIM)降低,而角膜表面测量指数(CSMI)和角膜表面测量的总体差异(ODC)都增加。在本研究中,人类角质层对洗涤产品的反应性和个体间差异明显高于狗。对于三个角膜表面测量变量,在两个面板组中收集的数据之间发现了线性相关性。总之,这项初步研究表明,人类角质层对表面活性剂的平均反应性比狗强。表明皮肤敏感的个体间变异,在人类中似乎也更广泛。因此,使用角膜表面测定法从狗身上收集的数据不能外推到人类身上。这种物种之间的差异在评估产品安全性和支持温和声明方面可能是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书