Differences in In Vitro Disintegration Time among Canadian Brand and Generic Bisphosphonates.

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Osteoporosis Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-10-02 DOI:10.1155/2014/420451
Wojciech P Olszynski, Jonathan D Adachi, K Shawn Davison
{"title":"Differences in In Vitro Disintegration Time among Canadian Brand and Generic Bisphosphonates.","authors":"Wojciech P Olszynski,&nbsp;Jonathan D Adachi,&nbsp;K Shawn Davison","doi":"10.1155/2014/420451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to compare the disintegration times among Canadian-marketed brand (alendronate 70 mg, alendronate 70 mg plus vitamin D 5600 IU, and risedronate 35 mg) and generic (Novo-alendronate 70 mg and Apo-alendronate 70 mg) once-weekly dosed bisphosphonates. All disintegration tests were performed with a Vanderkamp Disintegration Tester. Disintegration was deemed to have occurred when no residue of the tablet, except fragments of insoluble coating or capsule shell, was visible. Eighteen to 20 samples were tested for each bisphosphonate group. The mean (±standard deviation) disintegration times were significantly (P < 0.05) faster for Apo-alendronate (26 ± 5.6 seconds) and Novo-alendronate (13 ± 1.1 seconds) as compared to brand alendronate (147 ± 50.5 seconds), brand alendronate plus vitamin D (378 ± 60.5 seconds), or brand risedronate (101 ± 20.6 seconds). The significantly faster disintegration of the generic tablets as compared to the brand bisphosphonates may have concerning safety and effectiveness implications for patients administering these therapies. </p>","PeriodicalId":45384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteoporosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/420451","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/420451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the disintegration times among Canadian-marketed brand (alendronate 70 mg, alendronate 70 mg plus vitamin D 5600 IU, and risedronate 35 mg) and generic (Novo-alendronate 70 mg and Apo-alendronate 70 mg) once-weekly dosed bisphosphonates. All disintegration tests were performed with a Vanderkamp Disintegration Tester. Disintegration was deemed to have occurred when no residue of the tablet, except fragments of insoluble coating or capsule shell, was visible. Eighteen to 20 samples were tested for each bisphosphonate group. The mean (±standard deviation) disintegration times were significantly (P < 0.05) faster for Apo-alendronate (26 ± 5.6 seconds) and Novo-alendronate (13 ± 1.1 seconds) as compared to brand alendronate (147 ± 50.5 seconds), brand alendronate plus vitamin D (378 ± 60.5 seconds), or brand risedronate (101 ± 20.6 seconds). The significantly faster disintegration of the generic tablets as compared to the brand bisphosphonates may have concerning safety and effectiveness implications for patients administering these therapies.

Abstract Image

加拿大品牌和通用双膦酸盐体外崩解时间的差异。
本研究的目的是比较加拿大上市品牌(阿仑膦酸盐70毫克,阿仑膦酸盐70毫克加维生素D 5600 IU,利塞膦酸盐35毫克)和通用(新阿仑膦酸盐70毫克和阿普阿仑膦酸盐70毫克)每周服用一次的双膦酸盐的崩解时间。所有崩解试验均使用范德坎普崩解仪进行。当除了不溶性包衣或胶囊壳的碎片外,没有任何残余物可见时,即认为发生了崩解。每个双膦酸盐组分别测试了18至20个样本。apo -阿仑膦酸钠(26±5.6秒)和novo -阿仑膦酸钠(13±1.1秒)的平均崩解时间(±标准差)显著(P < 0.05)快于品牌阿仑膦酸钠(147±50.5秒)、品牌阿仑膦酸钠加维生素D(378±60.5秒)和品牌立塞膦酸钠(101±20.6秒)。与品牌双膦酸盐相比,仿制药的崩解速度明显更快,这可能会对患者进行这些治疗的安全性和有效性产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信