The HCBS taxonomy: a new language for classifying home- and community-based services.

Medicare & medicaid research review Pub Date : 2014-09-22 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.5600/mmrr.004.03.b01
Victoria Peebles, Alex Bohl
{"title":"The HCBS taxonomy: a new language for classifying home- and community-based services.","authors":"Victoria Peebles, Alex Bohl","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.004.03.b01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION As states make home- and community-based services (HCBS) more accessible, researchers have become more interested in understanding service use and spending. Because state Medicaid programs differ in the types of services they offer and in how they report these services, analyzing HCBS at the national level is challenging. OBJECTIVE Describe the HCBS taxonomy and present findings on HCBS waiver expenditures and users. DATA This brief analyzed fee-for-service claims from 28 approved states in 2010 Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) files. We summed all expenditures and counted the unique number of users across each HCBS taxonomy service and category. METHODS The taxonomy was developed jointly by Truven Health (at that time Thomson Reuters) and Mathematica Policy Research, with stakeholder input, and reviewed using procedure codes. Today, the taxonomy is organized by 18 categories and over 60 specific services. FINDINGS For calendar year 2010, 28 states spent almost $23.6 billion on HCBS, with 80 percent of expenditures categorized as round-the-clock, home-based, and day services. Other services, such as case management, or equipment, modifications, and technology were widely used, but are not particularly costly and do not account for a large proportion of expenditures in every state. CONCLUSIONS By providing a common language, the taxonomy presents detailed information on services and makes it easier to assess and identify state-level variation for HCBS.","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"4 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4204915/pdf/mmrr2014-004-03-b01.pdf","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.004.03.b01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

INTRODUCTION As states make home- and community-based services (HCBS) more accessible, researchers have become more interested in understanding service use and spending. Because state Medicaid programs differ in the types of services they offer and in how they report these services, analyzing HCBS at the national level is challenging. OBJECTIVE Describe the HCBS taxonomy and present findings on HCBS waiver expenditures and users. DATA This brief analyzed fee-for-service claims from 28 approved states in 2010 Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) files. We summed all expenditures and counted the unique number of users across each HCBS taxonomy service and category. METHODS The taxonomy was developed jointly by Truven Health (at that time Thomson Reuters) and Mathematica Policy Research, with stakeholder input, and reviewed using procedure codes. Today, the taxonomy is organized by 18 categories and over 60 specific services. FINDINGS For calendar year 2010, 28 states spent almost $23.6 billion on HCBS, with 80 percent of expenditures categorized as round-the-clock, home-based, and day services. Other services, such as case management, or equipment, modifications, and technology were widely used, but are not particularly costly and do not account for a large proportion of expenditures in every state. CONCLUSIONS By providing a common language, the taxonomy presents detailed information on services and makes it easier to assess and identify state-level variation for HCBS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

HCBS分类法:一种对家庭和社区服务进行分类的新语言。
导言:随着各州使家庭和社区服务(HCBS)更容易获得,研究人员对了解服务的使用和支出越来越感兴趣。由于各州医疗补助计划在提供的服务类型和报告这些服务的方式上有所不同,因此在全国范围内分析HCBS是具有挑战性的。目的:描述HCBS的分类和目前对HCBS豁免支出和用户的调查结果。数据:本简报分析了2010年医疗补助分析提取(MAX)文件中28个州的按服务收费索赔。我们汇总了所有支出,并计算了每个HCBS分类法服务和类别的唯一用户数量。方法:该分类法由Truven Health(当时的Thomson Reuters)和Mathematica Policy Research联合开发,听取了利益相关者的意见,并使用程序代码进行了审查。如今,该分类法由18个类别和60多个特定服务组成。调查结果:2010日历年,28个州在HCBS上花费了近236亿美元,其中80%的支出被归类为全天候、家庭和日间服务。其他服务,如病例管理、设备、改造和技术被广泛使用,但不是特别昂贵,也没有在每个州的支出中占很大比例。结论:通过提供一种通用语言,该分类法提供了有关服务的详细信息,并使评估和识别HCBS在州一级的变化变得更加容易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信