Biases in Short-Term Mood Prediction in Individuals with Depression and Anxiety Symptoms.

Susan J Wenze, Kathleen C Gunthert, Anthony H Ahrens, T C Taylor Bos
{"title":"Biases in Short-Term Mood Prediction in Individuals with Depression and Anxiety Symptoms.","authors":"Susan J Wenze, Kathleen C Gunthert, Anthony H Ahrens, T C Taylor Bos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We used ecological momentary assessment to explore depressive and anxious biases in within-day negative and positive mood predictions. Participants (<i>N</i> = 120) who were higher in depression symptoms demonstrated stronger biases (i.e., were more pessimistically biased) in the prediction of negative mood and weaker biases (i.e., were less optimistically biased) in the prediction of positive mood (<i>b</i><sub>01</sub> = .002, <i>SE</i> = .001, <i>p</i> = .031 and <i>b</i><sub>01</sub> = -.008, SE = .002, <i>p</i> < .001, respectively). Anxiety symptoms were not associated with short-term mood prediction biases (<i>p</i>'s > .10). Such biases might influence daily decisions and experiences as well as impact longer-term outcomes. Limitations and future research directions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":89678,"journal":{"name":"Individual differences research : IDR","volume":"11 3","pages":"91-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4203448/pdf/nihms517465.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Individual differences research : IDR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We used ecological momentary assessment to explore depressive and anxious biases in within-day negative and positive mood predictions. Participants (N = 120) who were higher in depression symptoms demonstrated stronger biases (i.e., were more pessimistically biased) in the prediction of negative mood and weaker biases (i.e., were less optimistically biased) in the prediction of positive mood (b01 = .002, SE = .001, p = .031 and b01 = -.008, SE = .002, p < .001, respectively). Anxiety symptoms were not associated with short-term mood prediction biases (p's > .10). Such biases might influence daily decisions and experiences as well as impact longer-term outcomes. Limitations and future research directions are discussed.

抑郁症和焦虑症患者短期情绪预测的偏差。
我们使用生态学瞬间评估来探索抑郁和焦虑情绪在日内消极和积极情绪预测中的偏差。抑郁症状较重的参与者(N = 120)在预测消极情绪时表现出更强的偏差(即更悲观),而在预测积极情绪时表现出更弱的偏差(即更不乐观)(分别为 b01 = .002, SE = .001, p = .031 和 b01 = -.008, SE = .002, p < .001)。焦虑症状与短期情绪预测偏差无关(p>.10)。这种偏差可能会影响日常决策和体验,并对长期结果产生影响。本文讨论了研究的局限性和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信