Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial.

Rahul Ganavadiya, B R Chandra Shekar, Vrinda Saxena, Poonam Tomar, Ruchika Gupta, Garima Khandelwal
{"title":"Disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments: A randomized trial.","authors":"Rahul Ganavadiya,&nbsp;B R Chandra Shekar,&nbsp;Vrinda Saxena,&nbsp;Poonam Tomar,&nbsp;Ruchika Gupta,&nbsp;Garima Khandelwal","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.141946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Cross infection remains one of the major challenges in the dental profession, especially in field settings. Transmission of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus have raised a major concern for patients and dental staff. These risks can be eliminated by effective sterilization and disinfection techniques.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim was to compare the disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>This was a randomized, cross over trial conducted among three participants selected from a research laboratory, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study participants were examined 4 times on different days. Each time, the coded mouth mirrors of different make were used, and the disinfection was accomplished using coded disinfectants. The reduction in total viable count was compared between the three groups (2% glutaraldehyde, 6% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and 99.9% ethyl alcohol) with distilled water as negative control and autoclaving as a positive control. Furthermore, the predisinfection count was compared between the instruments of different make.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and One-way ANOVA. The statistical significance was fixed at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Autoclaved instruments resulted in complete elimination of viable micro-organisms. Maximum reduction in microbial load was observed after disinfection with H2O2 followed by glutaraldehyde, ethyl alcohol and distilled water in descending order. Furthermore, maximum microbial contamination was recorded on locally manufactured mirrors, while standard plain mirrors showed least contamination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although, a significant reduction in total viable count was observed with all the disinfectants evaluated in the present study, none of the disinfectants was successful in completely eliminating the viable micro-organisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"5 4","pages":"98-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4103/0976-0105.141946","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Context: Cross infection remains one of the major challenges in the dental profession, especially in field settings. Transmission of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus have raised a major concern for patients and dental staff. These risks can be eliminated by effective sterilization and disinfection techniques.

Aim: The aim was to compare the disinfecting efficacy of three chemical disinfectants on contaminated diagnostic instruments.

Settings and design: This was a randomized, cross over trial conducted among three participants selected from a research laboratory, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Materials and methods: The study participants were examined 4 times on different days. Each time, the coded mouth mirrors of different make were used, and the disinfection was accomplished using coded disinfectants. The reduction in total viable count was compared between the three groups (2% glutaraldehyde, 6% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and 99.9% ethyl alcohol) with distilled water as negative control and autoclaving as a positive control. Furthermore, the predisinfection count was compared between the instruments of different make.

Statistical analysis used: Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and One-way ANOVA. The statistical significance was fixed at 0.05.

Results: Autoclaved instruments resulted in complete elimination of viable micro-organisms. Maximum reduction in microbial load was observed after disinfection with H2O2 followed by glutaraldehyde, ethyl alcohol and distilled water in descending order. Furthermore, maximum microbial contamination was recorded on locally manufactured mirrors, while standard plain mirrors showed least contamination.

Conclusions: Although, a significant reduction in total viable count was observed with all the disinfectants evaluated in the present study, none of the disinfectants was successful in completely eliminating the viable micro-organisms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

三种化学消毒剂对污染诊断仪器的消毒效果:随机试验。
背景:交叉感染仍然是牙科专业的主要挑战之一,特别是在现场设置。乙型肝炎、丙型肝炎和人类免疫缺陷病毒的传播引起了患者和牙科人员的主要关注。这些风险可以通过有效的灭菌和消毒技术消除。目的:比较三种化学消毒剂对污染的诊断仪器的消毒效果。环境和设计:这是一项随机交叉试验,从印度中央邦博帕尔的一个研究实验室中选择了三名参与者。材料与方法:研究对象在不同日期接受4次检查。每次使用不同型号的编码口镜,使用编码消毒剂消毒。以蒸馏水为阴性对照,高压灭菌为阳性对照,比较三组(2%戊二醛,6%过氧化氢(H2O2)和99.9%乙醇)总活菌数的减少。并比较了不同型号仪器的消毒前计数。采用统计学分析:采用配对t检验和单因素方差分析进行统计学分析。统计学意义为0.05。结果:高压灭菌仪器完全消除了活菌。用H2O2消毒后微生物负荷下降幅度最大,其次为戊二醛、乙醇和蒸馏水。此外,在本地制造的镜子上记录的微生物污染最大,而标准的普通镜子显示的污染最少。结论:虽然本研究评估的所有消毒剂都能显著降低总活菌数,但没有一种消毒剂能完全消除活菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信