Reactive metabolites in early drug development: predictive in vitro tools.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Olavi Pelkonen, Markku Pasanen, Ari Tolonen, Mikko Koskinen, Jukka Hakkola, Khaled Abass, Jaana Laine, Merja Hakkinen, Risto Juvonen, Seppo Auriola, Markus Storvik, Pasi Huuskonen, Timo Rousu, Maiju Rahikkala
{"title":"Reactive metabolites in early drug development: predictive in vitro tools.","authors":"Olavi Pelkonen,&nbsp;Markku Pasanen,&nbsp;Ari Tolonen,&nbsp;Mikko Koskinen,&nbsp;Jukka Hakkola,&nbsp;Khaled Abass,&nbsp;Jaana Laine,&nbsp;Merja Hakkinen,&nbsp;Risto Juvonen,&nbsp;Seppo Auriola,&nbsp;Markus Storvik,&nbsp;Pasi Huuskonen,&nbsp;Timo Rousu,&nbsp;Maiju Rahikkala","doi":"10.2174/0929867321666141012175543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug metabolism can result in the formation of highly reactive metabolites that are known to play a role in toxicity resulting in a significant proportion of attrition during drug development and clinical use. Thus, the earlier such reactivity was detected, the better. This review summarizes our multi-year project, together with pertinent literature, to examine a battery of in vitro tests capable of detecting the formation of reactive metabolites. Principal prerequisites for such tests were delineated: chemicals known/not known to cause tissue injury and produce reactive metabolites, activation system (mainly human-derived), small- and large-molecular targets (small-molecular trappers, peptides, proteins), analytical techniques (mass spectrometry), and cellular toxicity biomarkers. The current status of in vitro tools to detect reactive intermediates is the following: 1. Small-molecular trapping agents such glutathione or cyanide detect the production of reactive species with high sensitivity by proper MS technique. However, it seems that also putative \"negatives\" give rise to corresponding adducts. 2. Results from peptide and dG (DNA targeting) trapper studies are generally in line with those of small-molecular trappers, although also important differences exist. These two trapping platforms do not overlap. 3. It is anticipated that the in vitro adduct studies could be fully interpreted only in conjunction with toxicity biomarker (such as the Nrf2 pathway) information from whole cells or tissues. However, while there are tools to characterize the chemical liability and there are correlation between individual/integrated endpoints and toxicity, there are still severe gaps in understanding the mechanisms behind the link between reactive metabolites and adverse effects. </p>","PeriodicalId":10984,"journal":{"name":"Current medicinal chemistry","volume":"22 4","pages":"538-50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current medicinal chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867321666141012175543","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Drug metabolism can result in the formation of highly reactive metabolites that are known to play a role in toxicity resulting in a significant proportion of attrition during drug development and clinical use. Thus, the earlier such reactivity was detected, the better. This review summarizes our multi-year project, together with pertinent literature, to examine a battery of in vitro tests capable of detecting the formation of reactive metabolites. Principal prerequisites for such tests were delineated: chemicals known/not known to cause tissue injury and produce reactive metabolites, activation system (mainly human-derived), small- and large-molecular targets (small-molecular trappers, peptides, proteins), analytical techniques (mass spectrometry), and cellular toxicity biomarkers. The current status of in vitro tools to detect reactive intermediates is the following: 1. Small-molecular trapping agents such glutathione or cyanide detect the production of reactive species with high sensitivity by proper MS technique. However, it seems that also putative "negatives" give rise to corresponding adducts. 2. Results from peptide and dG (DNA targeting) trapper studies are generally in line with those of small-molecular trappers, although also important differences exist. These two trapping platforms do not overlap. 3. It is anticipated that the in vitro adduct studies could be fully interpreted only in conjunction with toxicity biomarker (such as the Nrf2 pathway) information from whole cells or tissues. However, while there are tools to characterize the chemical liability and there are correlation between individual/integrated endpoints and toxicity, there are still severe gaps in understanding the mechanisms behind the link between reactive metabolites and adverse effects.

早期药物开发中的反应性代谢物:体外预测工具。
药物代谢可导致高反应性代谢物的形成,这些代谢物已知在药物开发和临床使用过程中起毒性作用,导致很大比例的损耗。因此,越早检测到这种反应性越好。这篇综述总结了我们多年来的项目,以及相关文献,研究了一系列能够检测反应性代谢物形成的体外试验。这些测试的主要先决条件是:已知/未知的导致组织损伤和产生反应性代谢物的化学物质、激活系统(主要是人类来源的)、小分子和大分子靶标(小分子捕集器、肽、蛋白质)、分析技术(质谱)和细胞毒性生物标志物。检测活性中间体的体外工具的现状如下:1。小分子诱捕剂如谷胱甘肽或氰化物通过适当的质谱技术以高灵敏度检测活性物质的产生。然而,似乎假定的“否定”也会产生相应的加合物。2. 肽和dG (DNA靶向)捕集器的研究结果与小分子捕集器的研究结果基本一致,尽管也存在重要差异。这两个捕获平台不重叠。3.预计体外加合物研究只能与来自整个细胞或组织的毒性生物标志物(如Nrf2途径)信息相结合才能完全解释。然而,虽然有表征化学倾向的工具,并且存在个体/综合终点与毒性之间的相关性,但在理解反应性代谢物与不良反应之间联系背后的机制方面仍然存在严重差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current medicinal chemistry
Current medicinal chemistry 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aims & Scope Current Medicinal Chemistry covers all the latest and outstanding developments in medicinal chemistry and rational drug design. Each issue contains a series of timely in-depth reviews and guest edited thematic issues written by leaders in the field covering a range of the current topics in medicinal chemistry. The journal also publishes reviews on recent patents. Current Medicinal Chemistry is an essential journal for every medicinal chemist who wishes to be kept informed and up-to-date with the latest and most important developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书