The Diagnostic Apathia Scale predicts a dose-remission relationship of T-PEMF in treatment-resistant depression.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Acta Neuropsychiatrica Pub Date : 2015-02-01 Epub Date: 2014-10-02 DOI:10.1017/neu.2014.26
Per Bech, Marianne Lunde, Lise Lauritzen, Birgit Straasø, Lone Lindberg, Maj Vinberg, Mogens Undén, Lone Christina Hellström, Steen Dissing, Erik Roj Larsen
{"title":"The Diagnostic Apathia Scale predicts a dose-remission relationship of T-PEMF in treatment-resistant depression.","authors":"Per Bech,&nbsp;Marianne Lunde,&nbsp;Lise Lauritzen,&nbsp;Birgit Straasø,&nbsp;Lone Lindberg,&nbsp;Maj Vinberg,&nbsp;Mogens Undén,&nbsp;Lone Christina Hellström,&nbsp;Steen Dissing,&nbsp;Erik Roj Larsen","doi":"10.1017/neu.2014.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive validity of the apathy subsyndrome in patients with therapy-resistant depression in the dose-remission study with transcranial pulsating electromagnetic fields (T-PEMF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The apathy subsyndrome consists of the symptoms of fatigue, concentration and memory problems, lack of interests, difficulties in making decisions, and sleep problems. We evaluated 65 patients with therapy-resistant depression. In total, 34 of these patients received placebo T-PEMF in the afternoon and active T-PEMF in the morning, that is, one daily dose. The remaining 31 patients received active T-PEMF twice daily. Duration of treatment was 8 weeks in both groups. The Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D17) and the Bech-Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale (MES) were used to measure remission. We also focused on the Diagnostic Apathia Scale, which is based on a mixture of items from the MINI and the HAM-D17/MES.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients without apathy, the remission rate after T-PEMF was 83.9% versus 58.8% in patients with apathy (p≤0.05). In patients without apathy receiving one active dose daily 94.4% remitted versus 50% for patients with apathy (p≤0.05). In patients without apathy who received two active doses 69.9% remitted versus 66.7% for patients with apathy (p≤0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Taking the baseline diagnosis of the apathy syndrome into consideration, we found that in patients without apathy one daily dose of T-PEMF is sufficient, but in patients with apathy two daily doses are necessary. Including the apathy syndrome as predictor in future studies would seem to be clinically relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":48964,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/neu.2014.26","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2014.26","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive validity of the apathy subsyndrome in patients with therapy-resistant depression in the dose-remission study with transcranial pulsating electromagnetic fields (T-PEMF).

Methods: The apathy subsyndrome consists of the symptoms of fatigue, concentration and memory problems, lack of interests, difficulties in making decisions, and sleep problems. We evaluated 65 patients with therapy-resistant depression. In total, 34 of these patients received placebo T-PEMF in the afternoon and active T-PEMF in the morning, that is, one daily dose. The remaining 31 patients received active T-PEMF twice daily. Duration of treatment was 8 weeks in both groups. The Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D17) and the Bech-Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale (MES) were used to measure remission. We also focused on the Diagnostic Apathia Scale, which is based on a mixture of items from the MINI and the HAM-D17/MES.

Results: In patients without apathy, the remission rate after T-PEMF was 83.9% versus 58.8% in patients with apathy (p≤0.05). In patients without apathy receiving one active dose daily 94.4% remitted versus 50% for patients with apathy (p≤0.05). In patients without apathy who received two active doses 69.9% remitted versus 66.7% for patients with apathy (p≤0.05).

Conclusion: Taking the baseline diagnosis of the apathy syndrome into consideration, we found that in patients without apathy one daily dose of T-PEMF is sufficient, but in patients with apathy two daily doses are necessary. Including the apathy syndrome as predictor in future studies would seem to be clinically relevant.

诊断性冷漠量表预测治疗难治性抑郁症中T-PEMF的剂量-缓解关系。
目的:本研究的目的是在经颅脉冲电磁场(T-PEMF)剂量缓解研究中评估冷漠亚综合征对难治性抑郁症患者的预测有效性。方法:冷漠亚综合征包括疲劳、注意力和记忆问题、缺乏兴趣、决策困难和睡眠问题。我们评估了65例难治性抑郁症患者。总共有34名患者在下午接受安慰剂T-PEMF治疗,上午接受活性T-PEMF治疗,即每日一次剂量。其余31名患者每天接受两次活性T-PEMF治疗。两组治疗时间均为8周。采用Hamilton抑郁量表(HAM-D17)和Bech-Rafaelsen抑郁量表(MES)测量缓解程度。我们还关注了诊断性冷漠量表,它是基于MINI和HAM-D17/MES项目的混合。结果:无冷漠患者T-PEMF后缓解率为83.9%,有冷漠患者为58.8% (p≤0.05)。在无冷漠的患者中,每天接受一次活性剂量的患者缓解率为94.4%,而冷漠的患者为50% (p≤0.05)。在没有冷漠的患者中,接受两次活性剂量的69.9%缓解,而冷漠的患者为66.7% (p≤0.05)。结论:考虑到淡漠综合征的基线诊断,我们发现无淡漠患者每日1剂量T-PEMF就足够了,而淡漠患者则需要每日2剂量T-PEMF。在未来的研究中将冷漠综合征作为预测因素似乎具有临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
Acta Neuropsychiatrica NEUROSCIENCES-PSYCHIATRY
自引率
5.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Acta Neuropsychiatrica is an international journal focussing on translational neuropsychiatry. It publishes high-quality original research papers and reviews. The Journal''s scope specifically highlights the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health that can be viewed broadly as the spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信