Evidence for the efficacy of a bioresonance method in smoking cessation: a pilot study.

Forschende Komplementarmedizin Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-08-05 DOI:10.1159/000365742
Aylin Pihtili, Michael Galle, Caglar Cuhadaroglu, Zeki Kilicaslan, Halim Issever, Feyza Erkan, Tulin Cagatay, Ziya Gulbaran
{"title":"Evidence for the efficacy of a bioresonance method in smoking cessation: a pilot study.","authors":"Aylin Pihtili,&nbsp;Michael Galle,&nbsp;Caglar Cuhadaroglu,&nbsp;Zeki Kilicaslan,&nbsp;Halim Issever,&nbsp;Feyza Erkan,&nbsp;Tulin Cagatay,&nbsp;Ziya Gulbaran","doi":"10.1159/000365742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the 1970s, MORA bioresonance therapy has globally been applied in the context of complementary medicine for various indications. In this regard, practitioners also report successful application in smoking cessation. The present study aims to verify these reports in a controlled study setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In order to achieve the aforementioned objective, we subjected the bioresonance method to a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study involving 190 smokers. In both study groups (placebo n = 95; active bioresonance group; n = 95) the course of treatment and study conditions were standardized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1 week (77.2% vs. 54.8%), 2 weeks (62.4% vs. 34.4%), 1 month (51.1% vs. 28.6%), and 1 year (28.6% vs. 16.1%) after treatment, the success rate in the verum group differed significantly from the results in the placebo group. Also, the subjective health condition after treatment and subjective assessment of efficacy, polled after 1 week, were significantly more positive among participants in the active bioresonance therapy group than among those in the placebo group. Adverse side effects were not observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the findings attained by this pilot study, bioresonance therapy is clinically effective in smoking cessation and does not show any adverse side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":51049,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000365742","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000365742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: Since the 1970s, MORA bioresonance therapy has globally been applied in the context of complementary medicine for various indications. In this regard, practitioners also report successful application in smoking cessation. The present study aims to verify these reports in a controlled study setting.

Methods: In order to achieve the aforementioned objective, we subjected the bioresonance method to a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study involving 190 smokers. In both study groups (placebo n = 95; active bioresonance group; n = 95) the course of treatment and study conditions were standardized.

Results: 1 week (77.2% vs. 54.8%), 2 weeks (62.4% vs. 34.4%), 1 month (51.1% vs. 28.6%), and 1 year (28.6% vs. 16.1%) after treatment, the success rate in the verum group differed significantly from the results in the placebo group. Also, the subjective health condition after treatment and subjective assessment of efficacy, polled after 1 week, were significantly more positive among participants in the active bioresonance therapy group than among those in the placebo group. Adverse side effects were not observed.

Conclusion: According to the findings attained by this pilot study, bioresonance therapy is clinically effective in smoking cessation and does not show any adverse side effects.

生物共振方法在戒烟中的有效性证据:一项试点研究。
背景:自20世纪70年代以来,MORA生物共振疗法已在全球范围内作为补充医学应用于各种适应症。在这方面,从业员亦报告成功应用于戒烟。本研究旨在在对照研究环境中验证这些报告。方法:为了达到上述目的,我们对190名吸烟者进行了一项前瞻性、安慰剂对照、双盲、平行组研究。在两个研究组中(安慰剂n = 95;活性生物共振组;N = 95)的治疗过程和研究条件标准化。结果:治疗后1周(77.2% vs. 54.8%)、2周(62.4% vs. 34.4%)、1个月(51.1% vs. 28.6%)、1年(28.6% vs. 16.1%), verum组与安慰剂组的成功率均有显著差异。治疗后主观健康状况和1周后的主观疗效评价,积极生物共振治疗组显著高于安慰剂组。未观察到不良副作用。结论:根据本初步研究的结果,生物共振疗法在临床戒烟方面是有效的,没有出现任何不良副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forschende Komplementarmedizin
Forschende Komplementarmedizin 医学-全科医学与补充医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信