[Problems in integrative postgraduate medical training of physicians at anthroposophic hospitals in Germany and Switzerland].

Forschende Komplementarmedizin Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-08-17 DOI:10.1159/000366187
Peter Heusser, Sabine Eberhard, Johannes Weinzirl, Pascale Orlow, Bettina Berger
{"title":"[Problems in integrative postgraduate medical training of physicians at anthroposophic hospitals in Germany and Switzerland].","authors":"Peter Heusser,&nbsp;Sabine Eberhard,&nbsp;Johannes Weinzirl,&nbsp;Pascale Orlow,&nbsp;Bettina Berger","doi":"10.1159/000366187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anthroposophic hospitals provide integrative medical care by complementing conventional (CON) with anthroposophic medicine (AM). They teach integrative medicine in postgraduate medical training (PGMT). In a first evaluation of PGMT quality in AM, we analyzed the problems of this training from the perspectives of trainers and trainees.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional full survey of all trainee and trainer physicians at the 15 AM hospitals in Germany (DE) and Switzerland (CH) with questionnaires of the Swiss Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, complemented by a module for AM. We also conducted descriptive statistics for questions with answering scales as well as calculations of group differences (two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test) and a qualitative content analysis (Mayring) of free text answers related to the problem analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate in DE embraced 89 out of 215 (41.39%) surveyed trainees and 78 out of 184 (42.39%) trainers; in CH, the response rate comprised 19 out of 25 (76%) trainees and 22 out of 30 (73.33%) trainers. Free text answers related to problem analysis in DE and CH were given by 16 out of 108 (14.8%) trainees and by 20 out of 100 (20%) trainers, overall. Perceived main problems include work overload; shortcomings in work organization; delimitation of competences; interprofessional cooperation; financial resources (trainers); wages (trainees DE); practical relevance of AM (trainees and trainers in DE); professional or didactic competence of trainers; lack of interest in AM (trainees); problems with learning and practicing AM; no curriculum for postgraduate medical training in AM; tensions between AM and CON. Explanations for the differences between DE and CH include larger departments and the DRG system in DE, but also better structural conditions for AM PGMT in CH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Main problems of PGMT in AM include not only non-specific and systemic aspects, but also AM-specific issues. In order to develop a basis for concrete problem solving options, this study will be complemented by an analysis of solution ideas from the perspective of the involved trainers and trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":51049,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000366187","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000366187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Anthroposophic hospitals provide integrative medical care by complementing conventional (CON) with anthroposophic medicine (AM). They teach integrative medicine in postgraduate medical training (PGMT). In a first evaluation of PGMT quality in AM, we analyzed the problems of this training from the perspectives of trainers and trainees.

Method: We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional full survey of all trainee and trainer physicians at the 15 AM hospitals in Germany (DE) and Switzerland (CH) with questionnaires of the Swiss Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, complemented by a module for AM. We also conducted descriptive statistics for questions with answering scales as well as calculations of group differences (two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test) and a qualitative content analysis (Mayring) of free text answers related to the problem analysis.

Results: The response rate in DE embraced 89 out of 215 (41.39%) surveyed trainees and 78 out of 184 (42.39%) trainers; in CH, the response rate comprised 19 out of 25 (76%) trainees and 22 out of 30 (73.33%) trainers. Free text answers related to problem analysis in DE and CH were given by 16 out of 108 (14.8%) trainees and by 20 out of 100 (20%) trainers, overall. Perceived main problems include work overload; shortcomings in work organization; delimitation of competences; interprofessional cooperation; financial resources (trainers); wages (trainees DE); practical relevance of AM (trainees and trainers in DE); professional or didactic competence of trainers; lack of interest in AM (trainees); problems with learning and practicing AM; no curriculum for postgraduate medical training in AM; tensions between AM and CON. Explanations for the differences between DE and CH include larger departments and the DRG system in DE, but also better structural conditions for AM PGMT in CH.

Conclusion: Main problems of PGMT in AM include not only non-specific and systemic aspects, but also AM-specific issues. In order to develop a basis for concrete problem solving options, this study will be complemented by an analysis of solution ideas from the perspective of the involved trainers and trainees.

[德国和瑞士人智医院医师研究生综合医学培训的问题]。
背景:人智医院通过补充传统医学(CON)和人智医学(AM)来提供综合医疗服务。他们在研究生医学培训(PGMT)中教授结合医学。在对AM中PGMT质量的首次评估中,我们从培训师和学员的角度分析了该培训存在的问题。方法:我们对德国(DE)和瑞士(CH)的15家AM医院的所有实习医生和培训医生进行了匿名横断面调查,调查问卷来自瑞士理工学院(ETH) z里奇,并配有AM模块。我们还对带有回答量表的问题进行了描述性统计和群体差异计算(双尾Mann-Whitney U检验),并对与问题分析相关的自由文本答案进行了定性内容分析(Mayring)。结果:接受调查的215名学员中有89名(41.39%),184名培训师中有78名(42.39%);在香港,25名受训者中有19名(76%)回应,30名受训者中有22名(73.33%)回应。108名受训者中有16名(14.8%)给出了与DE和CH问题分析相关的免费文本答案,100名受训者中有20名(20%)给出了免费文本答案。感知到的主要问题包括超负荷工作;工作组织的不足;权限界定;interprofessional合作;财政资源(培训师);工资(实习生DE);AM (DE的学员和培训师)的实际相关性;培训师的专业或教学能力;对AM(学员)缺乏兴趣;学习和实践AM的问题;没有AM的研究生医学培训课程;AM和con之间的紧张关系。DE和CH之间差异的解释包括DE更大的部门和DRG系统,以及CH更好的AM PGMT结构条件。结论:AM PGMT的主要问题不仅包括非特异性和系统性方面,还包括AM特异性问题。为了为具体解决问题的备选办法奠定基础,这项研究将辅以从有关训练员和受训人员的角度分析解决办法的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forschende Komplementarmedizin
Forschende Komplementarmedizin 医学-全科医学与补充医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信