[In vitro combined effects of double antibacterial drugs against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates: comparison among combinations of colistin, arbekacin, aztreonam, rifampicin and piperacillin].

The Japanese journal of antibiotics Pub Date : 2014-06-01
Rie Nagaoka, Kazuro Ikawa, Makoto Onodera, Yumiko Koba, Toshinori Hara, Yumiko Joichi, Michiya Yokozaki, Hiroki Ohge, Norifumi Morikawa
{"title":"[In vitro combined effects of double antibacterial drugs against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates: comparison among combinations of colistin, arbekacin, aztreonam, rifampicin and piperacillin].","authors":"Rie Nagaoka,&nbsp;Kazuro Ikawa,&nbsp;Makoto Onodera,&nbsp;Yumiko Koba,&nbsp;Toshinori Hara,&nbsp;Yumiko Joichi,&nbsp;Michiya Yokozaki,&nbsp;Hiroki Ohge,&nbsp;Norifumi Morikawa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This in vitro study examined the combined effects of double antibacterial drugs against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRP). The tested clinical isolates from Hiroshima University Hospital were 40 strains which met the criteria for MDRP, that is, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was > or = 16 microg/mL of meropenem, > or = 4 microg/mL of ciprofloxacin and > or = 32 microg/mL of amikacin. Using the original checkerboard plates for colistin (CL), arbekacin (ABK), aztreonam (AZT), rifampicin (RFP) and piperacillin (PIPC), MIC values were determined for single and double combinations. Based on the MIC values, fractional inhibitory concentration index values were calculated and the combined effects (synergy action or additive action) were evaluated. The three strongest drugs among the tested combinations were i) CL + RFP (synergy, 80.0%; additive, 17.5%), ii) RFP + ABK (synergy, 7.5%; additive, 70.0%) and iii) RFP + AZT (synergy, 5.0%; additive, 77.5%). In these cases, the arithmetic mean MIC value of each drug significantly decreased as follows: i) 1.38 microg/mL (alone) and 0.26 microg/mL (with RFP) for CL, 19.85 microg/mL (alone) and 1.85 microg/mL (with CL) for RFP; ii) 19.85 microg/mL (alone) and 7.53 microg/mL (with ABK) for RFP, 8.87 microg/mL (alone) and 2.79 microg/mL (with RFP) for ABK; iii) 19.85 microg/mL (alone) and 10.15 microg/mL (with AZT) for RFP, 28.3 microg/ mL (alone) and 6.65 microg/mL (with RFP) for AZT. Of 40 strains, metallo-beta-lactamase and aminoglycoside 6'-N-acetyltransferase were found in 20 and 37 strains, respectively; however, no significant influence of these factors was observed on the combined effects of i), ii) and iii). The results of this study provide an in vitro rationale for RFP plus CL, ABK or AZT as an effective combination therapy for MDRP infections, although the results should be verified and compared with other antibacterial drugs in further studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22536,"journal":{"name":"The Japanese journal of antibiotics","volume":"67 3","pages":"167-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Japanese journal of antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This in vitro study examined the combined effects of double antibacterial drugs against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRP). The tested clinical isolates from Hiroshima University Hospital were 40 strains which met the criteria for MDRP, that is, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was > or = 16 microg/mL of meropenem, > or = 4 microg/mL of ciprofloxacin and > or = 32 microg/mL of amikacin. Using the original checkerboard plates for colistin (CL), arbekacin (ABK), aztreonam (AZT), rifampicin (RFP) and piperacillin (PIPC), MIC values were determined for single and double combinations. Based on the MIC values, fractional inhibitory concentration index values were calculated and the combined effects (synergy action or additive action) were evaluated. The three strongest drugs among the tested combinations were i) CL + RFP (synergy, 80.0%; additive, 17.5%), ii) RFP + ABK (synergy, 7.5%; additive, 70.0%) and iii) RFP + AZT (synergy, 5.0%; additive, 77.5%). In these cases, the arithmetic mean MIC value of each drug significantly decreased as follows: i) 1.38 microg/mL (alone) and 0.26 microg/mL (with RFP) for CL, 19.85 microg/mL (alone) and 1.85 microg/mL (with CL) for RFP; ii) 19.85 microg/mL (alone) and 7.53 microg/mL (with ABK) for RFP, 8.87 microg/mL (alone) and 2.79 microg/mL (with RFP) for ABK; iii) 19.85 microg/mL (alone) and 10.15 microg/mL (with AZT) for RFP, 28.3 microg/ mL (alone) and 6.65 microg/mL (with RFP) for AZT. Of 40 strains, metallo-beta-lactamase and aminoglycoside 6'-N-acetyltransferase were found in 20 and 37 strains, respectively; however, no significant influence of these factors was observed on the combined effects of i), ii) and iii). The results of this study provide an in vitro rationale for RFP plus CL, ABK or AZT as an effective combination therapy for MDRP infections, although the results should be verified and compared with other antibacterial drugs in further studies.

[双重抗菌药物对多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌的体外联合作用:粘菌素、阿贝卡星、阿曲南、利福平、哌拉西林联合应用的比较]。
本实验研究了双重抗菌药物联合治疗多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌(MDRP)的效果。广岛大学医院临床分离的40株菌株符合MDRP标准,即最低抑菌浓度(MIC) >或= 16 μ g/mL的美罗培南,>或= 4 μ g/mL的环丙沙星,>或= 32 μ g/mL的阿米卡星。采用原棋盘板检测粘菌素(CL)、阿贝卡星(ABK)、氨曲南(AZT)、利福平(RFP)和哌拉西林(PIPC),测定单药和双药组合的MIC值。根据MIC值,计算分数抑制浓度指数值,并评价联合作用(协同作用或加性作用)。试验组合中最强的3种药物是:1)CL + RFP(协同作用,80.0%;添加剂,17.5%),ii) RFP + ABK(协同,7.5%;添加剂,70.0%)和iii) RFP + AZT(协同,5.0%;添加剂,77.5%)。在这些情况下,每种药物的算术平均MIC值显著降低如下:1)CL为1.38 μ g/mL(单独)和0.26 μ g/mL(带RFP), RFP为19.85 μ g/mL(单独)和1.85 μ g/mL(带CL);ii) RFP为19.85 μ g/mL(单独)和7.53 μ g/mL(含ABK), ABK为8.87 μ g/mL(单独)和2.79 μ g/mL(含RFP);iii) RFP为19.85 μ g/mL(单独)和10.15 μ g/mL(含AZT), AZT为28.3 μ g/mL(单独)和6.65 μ g/mL(含RFP)。40株中分别有20株和37株检测到金属- β -内酰胺酶和氨基糖苷6′- n -乙酰转移酶;然而,这些因素对i), ii)和iii)的联合作用没有显著影响。本研究结果为RFP与CL, ABK或AZT联合治疗MDRP感染提供了体外基础,尽管结果有待进一步研究验证并与其他抗菌药物进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信