Protein degradation by ubiquitin-proteasome system in formation and labilization of contextual conditioning memory.

IF 2.2
Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2014-08-18 Print Date: 2014-09-01 DOI:10.1101/lm.035998.114
María Sol Fustiñana, Verónica de la Fuente, Noel Federman, Ramiro Freudenthal, Arturo Romano
{"title":"Protein degradation by ubiquitin-proteasome system in formation and labilization of contextual conditioning memory.","authors":"María Sol Fustiñana,&nbsp;Verónica de la Fuente,&nbsp;Noel Federman,&nbsp;Ramiro Freudenthal,&nbsp;Arturo Romano","doi":"10.1101/lm.035998.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) of protein degradation has been evaluated in different forms of neural plasticity and memory. The role of UPS in such processes is controversial. Several results support the idea that the activation of this system in memory consolidation is necessary to overcome negative constrains for plasticity. In this case, the inhibition of the UPS during consolidation impairs memory. Similar results were reported for memory reconsolidation. However, in other cases, the inhibition of UPS had no effect on memory consolidation and reconsolidation but impedes the amnesic action of protein synthesis inhibition after retrieval. The last finding suggests a specific action of the UPS inhibitor on memory labilization. However, another interpretation is possible in terms of the synthesis/degradation balance of positive and negative elements in neural plasticity, as was found in the case of long-term potentiation. To evaluate these alternative interpretations, other reconsolidation-interfering drugs than translation inhibitors should be tested. Here we analyzed initially the UPS inhibitor effect in contextual conditioning in crabs. We found that UPS inhibition during consolidation impaired long-term memory. In contrast, UPS inhibition did not affect memory reconsolidation after contextual retrieval but, in fact, impeded memory labilization, blocking the action of drugs that does not affect directly the protein synthesis. To extend these finding to vertebrates, we performed similar experiments in contextual fear memory in mice. We found that the UPS inhibitor in hippocampus affected memory consolidation and blocked memory labilization after retrieval. These findings exclude alternative interpretations to the requirement of UPS in memory labilization and give evidence of this mechanism in both vertebrates and invertebrates. </p>","PeriodicalId":520703,"journal":{"name":"Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)","volume":" ","pages":"478-87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1101/lm.035998.114","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.035998.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) of protein degradation has been evaluated in different forms of neural plasticity and memory. The role of UPS in such processes is controversial. Several results support the idea that the activation of this system in memory consolidation is necessary to overcome negative constrains for plasticity. In this case, the inhibition of the UPS during consolidation impairs memory. Similar results were reported for memory reconsolidation. However, in other cases, the inhibition of UPS had no effect on memory consolidation and reconsolidation but impedes the amnesic action of protein synthesis inhibition after retrieval. The last finding suggests a specific action of the UPS inhibitor on memory labilization. However, another interpretation is possible in terms of the synthesis/degradation balance of positive and negative elements in neural plasticity, as was found in the case of long-term potentiation. To evaluate these alternative interpretations, other reconsolidation-interfering drugs than translation inhibitors should be tested. Here we analyzed initially the UPS inhibitor effect in contextual conditioning in crabs. We found that UPS inhibition during consolidation impaired long-term memory. In contrast, UPS inhibition did not affect memory reconsolidation after contextual retrieval but, in fact, impeded memory labilization, blocking the action of drugs that does not affect directly the protein synthesis. To extend these finding to vertebrates, we performed similar experiments in contextual fear memory in mice. We found that the UPS inhibitor in hippocampus affected memory consolidation and blocked memory labilization after retrieval. These findings exclude alternative interpretations to the requirement of UPS in memory labilization and give evidence of this mechanism in both vertebrates and invertebrates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

泛素-蛋白酶体系统在情境条件记忆形成和稳定化中的蛋白质降解。
蛋白质降解的泛素-蛋白酶体系统(UPS)已经在不同形式的神经可塑性和记忆中进行了评估。UPS在这些过程中所扮演的角色是有争议的。一些结果支持这样的观点,即在记忆巩固中激活这个系统对于克服可塑性的负面限制是必要的。在这种情况下,在巩固过程中抑制UPS会损害记忆。记忆再巩固也有类似的结果。然而,在其他情况下,抑制UPS对记忆巩固和再巩固没有影响,但阻碍了蛋白质合成抑制在检索后的遗忘作用。最后的发现表明UPS抑制剂对记忆不稳定有特定的作用。然而,就神经可塑性中正负元素的合成/降解平衡而言,另一种解释是可能的,正如在长期增强的情况下发现的那样。为了评估这些可能的解释,应该测试翻译抑制剂以外的其他再巩固干扰药物。在这里,我们初步分析了UPS抑制剂在螃蟹情境条件反射中的作用。我们发现,在巩固过程中,UPS的抑制会损害长期记忆。相比之下,UPS抑制并不影响上下文检索后的记忆再巩固,但事实上,它阻碍了记忆的稳定,阻断了不直接影响蛋白质合成的药物的作用。为了将这些发现扩展到脊椎动物,我们在老鼠的情境恐惧记忆中进行了类似的实验。我们发现,海马体中的UPS抑制剂影响记忆巩固并阻断检索后的记忆稳定。这些发现排除了UPS在记忆稳定中需求的其他解释,并为脊椎动物和无脊椎动物的这种机制提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书