Hazard analysis of Arid and semi-Arid (ASAL) regions of Kenya.

J S Tabu, J A Otwelo, P Koskei, P Makokha
{"title":"Hazard analysis of Arid and semi-Arid (ASAL) regions of Kenya.","authors":"J S Tabu,&nbsp;J A Otwelo,&nbsp;P Koskei,&nbsp;P Makokha","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This paper describes a situationanalysis on hazards in the Arid and semi-Arid lands of Kenya. The leading hazards affecting the Arid and semi-arid lands are mainly natural and include among others drought, floods, and landslides. Other hazards of importance were found to be war and conflict, HIV/AIDS and fires. Over 80% of these are weather related.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The overall objective of this study was to prioritize hazards in the ASAL region. Specifically, the study identified the top ten hazards in the ASAL Districts of Kenya, determined Probability of occurrence; Analyzed the potential impact of the hazard and utilizing multiplier effect prioritized the Hazards using a hypothetical model.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This was a descriptive study conducted in over half of the Kenya's ASAL Districts in four regions of Lower and Upper Eastern, North Eastern and part of the Coast region. Six Districts were purposively selected per region with six officers from each District all totaling one hundred and forty four. The sectors where respondents were sourced from were Agriculture, Health, local Government, and Provincial Administration, Environment and NGO. The members through a consensus process analyzed hazards in groups of their respective districts using a tool that had been developed and respondents trained on its use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and forty four (144) officers from Twenty four Districts in the four regions were recruited. One hundred twenty seven (81%) were male and only 27 (19% ) were female The representation of participants per sector was Governance 25% followed by Civil society organizations 21%, Health 16%, Agriculture and arid lands 15%, Research and scientific institutions 13%. The top Priority Hazards identified using the mean score were Drought and famine (5.4) Epidemics and epizootics (3.8), HIV/AIDS (3.6), War and conflict (2.5), Floods (2.5) CONCLUSIONS: The exercise confirmed the priority hazards in the Arid and semi-arid regions of Kenya and described vulnerability factors that included water scarcity, poverty and low educational levels. The region suffers from a variety of hazards in particular Drought and famine, Epidemics including HIV/AIDS and War and conflict. Environmental degradation though given a low score may be more of a perception. There is need to undertake a comprehensive hazard and Vulnerability analysis at regional and country level to inform interventions and other developmental activities. Women should be targeted at the community and leadership level, and efforts to empower them should be stepped up.</p>","PeriodicalId":87601,"journal":{"name":"East African journal of public health","volume":"10 2","pages":"410-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This paper describes a situationanalysis on hazards in the Arid and semi-Arid lands of Kenya. The leading hazards affecting the Arid and semi-arid lands are mainly natural and include among others drought, floods, and landslides. Other hazards of importance were found to be war and conflict, HIV/AIDS and fires. Over 80% of these are weather related.

Objectives: The overall objective of this study was to prioritize hazards in the ASAL region. Specifically, the study identified the top ten hazards in the ASAL Districts of Kenya, determined Probability of occurrence; Analyzed the potential impact of the hazard and utilizing multiplier effect prioritized the Hazards using a hypothetical model.

Methodology: This was a descriptive study conducted in over half of the Kenya's ASAL Districts in four regions of Lower and Upper Eastern, North Eastern and part of the Coast region. Six Districts were purposively selected per region with six officers from each District all totaling one hundred and forty four. The sectors where respondents were sourced from were Agriculture, Health, local Government, and Provincial Administration, Environment and NGO. The members through a consensus process analyzed hazards in groups of their respective districts using a tool that had been developed and respondents trained on its use.

Results: One hundred and forty four (144) officers from Twenty four Districts in the four regions were recruited. One hundred twenty seven (81%) were male and only 27 (19% ) were female The representation of participants per sector was Governance 25% followed by Civil society organizations 21%, Health 16%, Agriculture and arid lands 15%, Research and scientific institutions 13%. The top Priority Hazards identified using the mean score were Drought and famine (5.4) Epidemics and epizootics (3.8), HIV/AIDS (3.6), War and conflict (2.5), Floods (2.5) CONCLUSIONS: The exercise confirmed the priority hazards in the Arid and semi-arid regions of Kenya and described vulnerability factors that included water scarcity, poverty and low educational levels. The region suffers from a variety of hazards in particular Drought and famine, Epidemics including HIV/AIDS and War and conflict. Environmental degradation though given a low score may be more of a perception. There is need to undertake a comprehensive hazard and Vulnerability analysis at regional and country level to inform interventions and other developmental activities. Women should be targeted at the community and leadership level, and efforts to empower them should be stepped up.

肯尼亚干旱和半干旱(ASAL)地区危害分析。
引言:本文对肯尼亚干旱半干旱地区的灾害状况进行了分析。影响干旱和半干旱地区的主要灾害是自然灾害,其中包括干旱、洪水和山体滑坡。其他重要的危害是战争和冲突、艾滋病毒/艾滋病和火灾。其中超过80%与天气有关。目的:本研究的总体目标是对ASAL地区的危险进行优先排序。具体而言,该研究确定了肯尼亚ASAL地区的十大危害,确定了发生的概率;分析了灾害的潜在影响,利用乘数效应对灾害进行了排序。方法:这是一项描述性研究,在肯尼亚上东部、东北部和部分沿海地区的四个地区的一半以上的ASAL地区进行。每个地区有目的地选出六个地区,每个地区选出六名官员,总数为一百四十四名。答复者来自农业、卫生、地方政府和省级行政、环境和非政府组织等部门。成员们通过协商一致的过程,使用已开发的工具分析了各自地区的危害,并对答复者进行了使用方面的培训。结果:从四个大区的24个区招募了144名警官。127人(81%)是男性,只有27人(19%)是女性。每个部门的参与者比例为治理25%,其次是民间社会组织21%,卫生16%,农业和干旱土地15%,研究和科学机构13%。使用平均得分确定的最优先灾害是干旱和饥荒(5.4分)、流行病和动物疫病(3.8分)、艾滋病毒/艾滋病(3.6分)、战争和冲突(2.5分)、洪水(2.5分)。结论:该演习确定了肯尼亚干旱和半干旱地区的优先灾害,并描述了包括缺水、贫困和低教育水平在内的脆弱性因素。该区域遭受各种灾害,特别是干旱和饥荒、包括艾滋病毒/艾滋病在内的流行病以及战争和冲突。环境恶化虽然得分较低,但可能更多的是一种感觉。有必要在区域和国家一级进行全面的危害和脆弱性分析,以便为干预措施和其他发展活动提供信息。应在社区和领导一级以妇女为目标,并应加紧努力赋予她们权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书