Institutional frameworks for management of epizoonotic emergencies in six countries in the Eastern Africa region: a situational analysis.

W Bazeyo, Roy W Mayega, I Nabukenya, J Keyyu, S Mamuya, S J Tabu, L Senna, M Mohammad, E Rugigana, A Alingi, M Mapatano, J Kiguli, C G Orach, G Burnham, J Killewo
{"title":"Institutional frameworks for management of epizoonotic emergencies in six countries in the Eastern Africa region: a situational analysis.","authors":"W Bazeyo,&nbsp;Roy W Mayega,&nbsp;I Nabukenya,&nbsp;J Keyyu,&nbsp;S Mamuya,&nbsp;S J Tabu,&nbsp;L Senna,&nbsp;M Mohammad,&nbsp;E Rugigana,&nbsp;A Alingi,&nbsp;M Mapatano,&nbsp;J Kiguli,&nbsp;C G Orach,&nbsp;G Burnham,&nbsp;J Killewo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Eastern Africa region is a hot-spot for epidemics of emerging zoonotic diseases ('epizoonotics'). However, the region's capacity for response to epidemics of zoonotic origin has not been documented. This paper presents a multi-country situational analysis on the institutional frameworks for management of zoonotic epidemics in the Eastern Africa region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-country assessment of 6 country teams was conducted (Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, DRC and Rwanda). It involved a review of records and interviews with key informants from agencies with a stake in the management of zoonotic and disasters in general in the respective countries. Qualitative data were analyzed for key emerging themes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There are many socio-cultural risk factors to epidemic prone zoonotic diseases in the region. Countries have varying levels of preparedness for zoonotic emergencies. All 6 countries have a framework for disaster management. However, technical response to epidemics is managed by the line sectors, with limited Inter-sectoral collaboration. Some sectors were disproportionately more prepared than others. Surveillance systems are mostly passive and inadequate for early detection. All 6 countries have built reasonable capacity to respond to avian influenza, but not other zoonotic emergencies. Most countries lack personnel at the operational levels, and veterinary public health services are ill-facilitated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is need to strengthen veterinary public health services at all levels, but with a 'one health' approach. There is also need to establish 'risk-based surveillance' hot spots for zoonotic epidemics and to build community resilience 'epizoonotic' diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":87601,"journal":{"name":"East African journal of public health","volume":"10 2","pages":"387-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Eastern Africa region is a hot-spot for epidemics of emerging zoonotic diseases ('epizoonotics'). However, the region's capacity for response to epidemics of zoonotic origin has not been documented. This paper presents a multi-country situational analysis on the institutional frameworks for management of zoonotic epidemics in the Eastern Africa region.

Methods: A multi-country assessment of 6 country teams was conducted (Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, DRC and Rwanda). It involved a review of records and interviews with key informants from agencies with a stake in the management of zoonotic and disasters in general in the respective countries. Qualitative data were analyzed for key emerging themes.

Findings: There are many socio-cultural risk factors to epidemic prone zoonotic diseases in the region. Countries have varying levels of preparedness for zoonotic emergencies. All 6 countries have a framework for disaster management. However, technical response to epidemics is managed by the line sectors, with limited Inter-sectoral collaboration. Some sectors were disproportionately more prepared than others. Surveillance systems are mostly passive and inadequate for early detection. All 6 countries have built reasonable capacity to respond to avian influenza, but not other zoonotic emergencies. Most countries lack personnel at the operational levels, and veterinary public health services are ill-facilitated.

Conclusion: There is need to strengthen veterinary public health services at all levels, but with a 'one health' approach. There is also need to establish 'risk-based surveillance' hot spots for zoonotic epidemics and to build community resilience 'epizoonotic' diseases.

东非区域六个国家管理动物传染病紧急情况的体制框架:情况分析。
东非地区是新兴人畜共患疾病(“人畜共患病”)流行的热点地区。然而,该区域应对人畜共患流行病的能力尚未得到记录。本文对东非地区管理人畜共患病流行病的体制框架进行了多国情况分析。方法:对6个国家小组(乌干达、肯尼亚、坦桑尼亚、埃塞俄比亚、刚果民主共和国和卢旺达)进行多国评估。它包括对记录进行审查,并与来自与各自国家人畜共患病和一般灾害管理有利害关系的机构的关键线人进行面谈。对主要新兴主题进行了定性数据分析。结果:该地区人畜共患疾病易流行的社会文化危险因素较多。各国对人畜共患病紧急情况的准备程度各不相同。所有6个国家都有灾害管理框架。但是,对流行病的技术反应是由各部门管理的,部门间合作有限。一些行业的准备程度远远超过其他行业。监测系统大多是被动的,不足以早期发现。所有6个国家都建立了应对禽流感的合理能力,但没有建立其他人畜共患病紧急情况的能力。大多数国家缺乏业务人员,兽医公共卫生服务也不便利。结论:需要加强各级兽医公共卫生服务,但要坚持“一个健康”的方针。还需要为人畜共患流行病建立“基于风险的监测”热点,并建立社区抵御“人畜共患”疾病的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书