Lessons learned from past experience with intensive livestock management systems.

G M Cronin, J L Rault, P C Glatz
{"title":"Lessons learned from past experience with intensive livestock management systems.","authors":"G M Cronin,&nbsp;J L Rault,&nbsp;P C Glatz","doi":"10.20506/rst.33.1.2256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The main impetus for 'modern' intensive animal production occurred after the Second World War, when Western governments developed policies to increase the availability of cheap, safe food for their populations. Livestock benefit under intensive husbandry by protection from environmental extremes and predators, and better nutritional and health management. Nevertheless, there are costs to the animal, such as impaired social behaviour, limited choice of living environment or pen mates, poor environmental stimulation and behavioural restrictions. The rapid progress in genetic selection of production traits has also, in some cases, adversely affected welfare by creating anatomical and metabolic problems. Above all, the intensively housed animal is heavily reliant on the stockperson and, therefore, inadequate care and husbandry practices by the stockperson may be the largest welfare risk. In a future in which the food supply may be limited as the world's population grows and land availability shrinks, intensive animal production is likely to expand. At the same time, ethical considerations surrounding intensive farming practices may also become more prominent. Novel technologies provide the opportunity to enhance both the productivity and welfare of intensively kept animals. Developing countries are also establishing more intensive commercial systems to meet their growing need for animal protein. Intensive livestock production in such countries has the potential for major expansion, particularly if such developments address the key constraints of poor welfare, inadequate nutrition, poor reproduction, poor housing, and high mortality often seen with traditional systems, and if farmer access to emerging market opportunities is improved. However, as shown by previous experience, inadequate regulation and staff who lack the appropriate training to care for the welfare of intensively housed livestock can be major challenges to overcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":520770,"journal":{"name":"Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)","volume":" ","pages":"139-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.33.1.2256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main impetus for 'modern' intensive animal production occurred after the Second World War, when Western governments developed policies to increase the availability of cheap, safe food for their populations. Livestock benefit under intensive husbandry by protection from environmental extremes and predators, and better nutritional and health management. Nevertheless, there are costs to the animal, such as impaired social behaviour, limited choice of living environment or pen mates, poor environmental stimulation and behavioural restrictions. The rapid progress in genetic selection of production traits has also, in some cases, adversely affected welfare by creating anatomical and metabolic problems. Above all, the intensively housed animal is heavily reliant on the stockperson and, therefore, inadequate care and husbandry practices by the stockperson may be the largest welfare risk. In a future in which the food supply may be limited as the world's population grows and land availability shrinks, intensive animal production is likely to expand. At the same time, ethical considerations surrounding intensive farming practices may also become more prominent. Novel technologies provide the opportunity to enhance both the productivity and welfare of intensively kept animals. Developing countries are also establishing more intensive commercial systems to meet their growing need for animal protein. Intensive livestock production in such countries has the potential for major expansion, particularly if such developments address the key constraints of poor welfare, inadequate nutrition, poor reproduction, poor housing, and high mortality often seen with traditional systems, and if farmer access to emerging market opportunities is improved. However, as shown by previous experience, inadequate regulation and staff who lack the appropriate training to care for the welfare of intensively housed livestock can be major challenges to overcome.

从过去集约化牲畜管理系统的经验中吸取的教训。
“现代”集约化动物生产的主要推动力发生在第二次世界大战后,当时西方政府制定了政策,为其人民增加廉价、安全食品的可得性。通过保护牲畜免受极端环境和捕食者的侵害,以及更好的营养和健康管理,集约化养殖使牲畜受益。然而,这对动物来说是有代价的,比如社会行为受损,生活环境或围栏伴侣的选择有限,环境刺激不足和行为限制。在某些情况下,在生产性状的遗传选择方面的迅速进展也通过产生解剖和代谢问题而对福利产生不利影响。最重要的是,集中饲养的动物严重依赖饲养员,因此,饲养员不适当的照料和饲养措施可能是最大的福利风险。在未来,随着世界人口的增长和土地供应的减少,粮食供应可能会受到限制,集约化的动物生产可能会扩大。与此同时,围绕集约化农业实践的伦理考虑也可能变得更加突出。新技术为提高集养动物的生产力和福利提供了机会。发展中国家也正在建立更加集约化的商业体系,以满足它们对动物蛋白日益增长的需求。这些国家的集约化畜牧生产具有大幅扩大的潜力,特别是如果这种发展能够解决传统系统中常见的福利差、营养不足、繁殖不良、住房条件差和死亡率高等关键制约因素,以及如果农民获得新兴市场机会的机会得到改善。然而,根据以往的经验,监管不足和工作人员缺乏适当的培训来照顾集中饲养的牲畜的福利可能是需要克服的主要挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信