["The hard core". Science between politics and philosophy by Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker and in the finalization theory].

Acta historica Leopoldina Pub Date : 2014-01-01
Wolfgang Krohn
{"title":"[\"The hard core\". Science between politics and philosophy by Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker and in the finalization theory].","authors":"Wolfgang Krohn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the Starnberg Max-Planck Institute one of the working groups was concerned with science as the formative condition--or \"hard core\"--of societal modernity, and with science as potential resource for solving social problems and addressing future goals. More precisely, the group intended to differentiate between phases in which scientific disciplines predominantly care for their own paradigmatic completion and those allowing their theoretical potential resonate with external needs. The conceptual model was coined \"finalization in science\". It soon provoked a heated controversy on the dangers of social control of science. The paper analyses Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker's views on the relation between philosophy and policy of science including his interpretation of Thomas Kuhn and reconstructs the impact of his ideas on the finalization model. It finally reflects on the relationship between science development and change of consciousness in the context of scientific responsibility for (the use of) research outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7006,"journal":{"name":"Acta historica Leopoldina","volume":" 63","pages":"283-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta historica Leopoldina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Starnberg Max-Planck Institute one of the working groups was concerned with science as the formative condition--or "hard core"--of societal modernity, and with science as potential resource for solving social problems and addressing future goals. More precisely, the group intended to differentiate between phases in which scientific disciplines predominantly care for their own paradigmatic completion and those allowing their theoretical potential resonate with external needs. The conceptual model was coined "finalization in science". It soon provoked a heated controversy on the dangers of social control of science. The paper analyses Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker's views on the relation between philosophy and policy of science including his interpretation of Thomas Kuhn and reconstructs the impact of his ideas on the finalization model. It finally reflects on the relationship between science development and change of consciousness in the context of scientific responsibility for (the use of) research outcomes.

“硬核”。政治与哲学之间的科学由卡尔·弗里德里希·冯Weizsäcker和在最终理论]。
在施塔恩贝格马克斯-普朗克研究所,其中一个工作组关注的是科学作为社会现代性的形成条件或“核心”,以及科学作为解决社会问题和实现未来目标的潜在资源。更准确地说,该小组打算区分科学学科主要关注自己的范式完成和那些允许其理论潜力与外部需求产生共鸣的阶段。这个概念模型被称为“科学的终结”。它很快引发了一场关于社会控制科学的危险的激烈争论。本文分析了卡尔·弗里德里希·冯Weizsäcker关于哲学与科学政策关系的观点,包括他对托马斯·库恩的解释,并重建了他的思想对最终模型的影响。最后在研究成果的科学责任(使用)背景下反思科学发展与意识变化之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信