Availability and usability of behavioral health organization encounter data in MAX 2009.

Medicare & medicaid research review Pub Date : 2014-06-09 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.5600/mmrr2014-004-02-b02
Jessica Beth Nysenbaum, Ellen Bouchery, Rosalie Malsberger
{"title":"Availability and usability of behavioral health organization encounter data in MAX 2009.","authors":"Jessica Beth Nysenbaum,&nbsp;Ellen Bouchery,&nbsp;Rosalie Malsberger","doi":"10.5600/mmrr2014-004-02-b02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the availability, completeness, and quality of the Behavioral Health Organization (BHO) encounter data in MAX 2009.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>The Medicaid Analytic Extract (MAX) 2009.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared metrics of reporting completeness and quality for BHOs to similar metrics for six states that primarily cover MH and SA services on a FFS basis. For the IP file, number of encounters per 1,000 person months of enrollment were compared. In the OT file, we examined three completeness measures: the number of claims per PME, number of claims reported per BHO outpatient service user, and the number of OT claims per service user.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Out of the 15 states reporting enrollment in BHO plans in MAX 2009, 10 reported complete capitation data. IP encounter data were available in four states (Arizona, Colorado, Florida, and Iowa), compared well to FFS ranges, and appear usable for research. OT data are available for five states, but our analysis suggests data are only sufficiently complete for analysis in Arizona and Iowa.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The initial assessment of the availability, completeness and quality of BHO encounter data in MAX 2009 suggests that only limited data are available and usable.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4067041/pdf/mmrr2014-004-02-b02.pdf","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr2014-004-02-b02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Objective: To assess the availability, completeness, and quality of the Behavioral Health Organization (BHO) encounter data in MAX 2009.

Data source: The Medicaid Analytic Extract (MAX) 2009.

Methods: We compared metrics of reporting completeness and quality for BHOs to similar metrics for six states that primarily cover MH and SA services on a FFS basis. For the IP file, number of encounters per 1,000 person months of enrollment were compared. In the OT file, we examined three completeness measures: the number of claims per PME, number of claims reported per BHO outpatient service user, and the number of OT claims per service user.

Principal findings: Out of the 15 states reporting enrollment in BHO plans in MAX 2009, 10 reported complete capitation data. IP encounter data were available in four states (Arizona, Colorado, Florida, and Iowa), compared well to FFS ranges, and appear usable for research. OT data are available for five states, but our analysis suggests data are only sufficiently complete for analysis in Arizona and Iowa.

Conclusions: The initial assessment of the availability, completeness and quality of BHO encounter data in MAX 2009 suggests that only limited data are available and usable.

Abstract Image

2009年MAX中行为健康组织遭遇数据的可用性和可用性。
目的:评估2009年MAX中行为健康组织(BHO)遭遇数据的可用性、完整性和质量。数据来源:医疗补助分析摘录(MAX) 2009。方法:我们将bho的报告完整性和质量指标与六个州的类似指标进行了比较,这些州主要涵盖了基于FFS的MH和SA服务。对于IP文件,比较了每1000人注册月的接触次数。在OT文件中,我们检查了三个完整性度量:每个PME的索赔数量,每个BHO门诊服务用户报告的索赔数量,以及每个服务用户的OT索赔数量。主要发现:在2009年MAX报告BHO计划登记人数的15个州中,有10个州报告了完整的人均数据。在四个州(亚利桑那州、科罗拉多州、佛罗里达州和爱荷华州)可获得IP遭遇数据,与FFS范围相比效果良好,似乎可用于研究。有5个州的OT数据可用,但我们的分析表明,只有亚利桑那州和爱荷华州的数据足够完整。结论:对2009年MAX中BHO遭遇数据的可得性、完整性和质量的初步评估表明,只有有限的数据是可获得和可用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信