Post-discharge follow-up visits and hospital utilization by Medicare patients, 2007-2010.

Medicare & medicaid research review Pub Date : 2014-05-09 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a01
Derek DeLia, Jian Tong, Dorothy Gaboda, Lawrence P Casalino
{"title":"Post-discharge follow-up visits and hospital utilization by Medicare patients, 2007-2010.","authors":"Derek DeLia, Jian Tong, Dorothy Gaboda, Lawrence P Casalino","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Document trends in time to post-discharge follow-up visit for Medicare patients with an index admission for heart failure (HF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Determine factors predicting whether the first post-discharge utilization event is a follow-up visit, treat-and-release emergency department (ED) visit, or readmission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Medicare claims data from 2007-2010, we plotted annual cumulative incidence functions for the time frame post-discharge to follow-up visit, accounting for competing risks with censoring at 30 days. We used multinomial probit regression to determine factors predicting the probability of first-occurring post-discharge utilization events within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For each cohort, the cumulative incidence of follow-up visits increased during the study period. For example, in 2010, 54.6% of HF patients had a follow-up visit within 10 days of discharge compared to 47.9% in 2007. Within each cohort, the largest increase in follow-up visits took place between 2008 and 2009. Follow-up visits were less likely for patients who were Black, Hispanic, and enrolled in Medicaid or Medicare Advantage, and they were more likely for patients with greater comorbidities and prior procedures as well as those with private or supplemental Medicare coverage. There were no changes in 30-day readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although increases in follow-up visits may have been influenced by the introduction of publicly reported readmission rates in 2009, these increases did not continue in 2010 and were not associated with a change in readmissions. Patients who were Black, Hispanic, and/or enrolled in Medicaid or Medicare Advantage were less likely to have follow-up visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062381/pdf/mmrr2014-004-02-a01.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Document trends in time to post-discharge follow-up visit for Medicare patients with an index admission for heart failure (HF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Determine factors predicting whether the first post-discharge utilization event is a follow-up visit, treat-and-release emergency department (ED) visit, or readmission.

Methods: Using Medicare claims data from 2007-2010, we plotted annual cumulative incidence functions for the time frame post-discharge to follow-up visit, accounting for competing risks with censoring at 30 days. We used multinomial probit regression to determine factors predicting the probability of first-occurring post-discharge utilization events within 30 days.

Results: For each cohort, the cumulative incidence of follow-up visits increased during the study period. For example, in 2010, 54.6% of HF patients had a follow-up visit within 10 days of discharge compared to 47.9% in 2007. Within each cohort, the largest increase in follow-up visits took place between 2008 and 2009. Follow-up visits were less likely for patients who were Black, Hispanic, and enrolled in Medicaid or Medicare Advantage, and they were more likely for patients with greater comorbidities and prior procedures as well as those with private or supplemental Medicare coverage. There were no changes in 30-day readmission rates.

Discussion: Although increases in follow-up visits may have been influenced by the introduction of publicly reported readmission rates in 2009, these increases did not continue in 2010 and were not associated with a change in readmissions. Patients who were Black, Hispanic, and/or enrolled in Medicaid or Medicare Advantage were less likely to have follow-up visits.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2007-2010 年医疗保险患者出院后的随访和医院使用情况。
目标:记录因心力衰竭(HF)、急性心肌梗死(AMI)或社区获得性肺炎(CAP)入院的医保患者出院后复诊时间的变化趋势。确定预测出院后首次使用事件是复诊、治疗后出院急诊科就诊还是再次入院的因素:利用 2007-2010 年的医疗保险理赔数据,我们绘制了出院后至复诊期间的年度累积发病率函数,并考虑了 30 天内的竞争风险。我们使用多项式概率回归来确定预测出院后 30 天内首次发生使用事件概率的因素:对于每个队列,随访的累计发生率在研究期间都有所上升。例如,2010 年,54.6% 的高血压患者在出院后 10 天内进行了随访,而 2007 年这一比例为 47.9%。在每个队列中,2008 年至 2009 年间随访率的增幅最大。黑人、西班牙裔、加入医疗补助计划或医疗保险优势计划的患者接受随访的几率较低,而合并症较多、既往接受过手术以及拥有私人或补充医疗保险的患者接受随访的几率较高。30 天再入院率没有变化:讨论:虽然随访次数的增加可能受到了 2009 年公开报告的再入院率的影响,但这些增加在 2010 年并未持续,也与再入院率的变化无关。黑人、西班牙裔和/或加入医疗补助计划或医疗保险优势计划的患者接受随访的可能性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信