Different Protein Expressions between Peripheral Ameloblastoma and Oral Basal Cell Carcinoma Occurred at the Same Mandibular Molar Area.

Korean Journal of Pathology Pub Date : 2014-04-01 Epub Date: 2014-04-28 DOI:10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2014.48.2.151
Yeon Sook Kim, Suk Keun Lee
{"title":"Different Protein Expressions between Peripheral Ameloblastoma and Oral Basal Cell Carcinoma Occurred at the Same Mandibular Molar Area.","authors":"Yeon Sook Kim,&nbsp;Suk Keun Lee","doi":"10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2014.48.2.151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripheral ameloblastoma (PA) in gingiva is rare and often confused with oral basal cell carcinoma (OBCC). The tissues of one case of PA and one case of OBCC with the same mandibular molar area affected were compared via an immunohistochemical examination using 50 antisera. The PA and OBCC showed similar proliferation of basaloid epithelial strands, but toluidine blue staining revealed that the PA had pinkish juxta-epithelial myxoid tissue, whereas the OBCC was infiltrated by many mast cells. Immunohistochemical comparisons showed that the PA was strongly positive for ameloblastin, KL1, p63, carcinoembryonic antigen, focal adhesion kinase, and cathepsin K, and slightly positive for amelogenin, Krox-25, E-cadherin, and PTCH1, whereas the OBCC was not. On the other hand, the OBCC was strongly positive for EpCam, matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-1, α1-antitrypsin, cytokeratin-7, p53, survivin, pAKT1, transforming growth factor-β1, NRAS, TGase-1, and tumor nescrosis factor-α, and consistently positive for β-catenin, MMP-2, cathepsin G, TGase-2, SOS-1, sonic hedgehog, and the β-defensins-1, -2, -3, while the PA was not. These data suggest that the tumorigeneses of PA and OBCC differ, and that PAs undergo odontogenic differentiation and generate oncogenic signals for infiltrative growth and bone resorption, whereas OBCCs undergo basaloid epidermal differentiation as a result of growth factor/cytokine-related oncogenic signals. </p>","PeriodicalId":49936,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Pathology","volume":"48 2","pages":"151-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2014.48.2.151","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2014.48.2.151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Peripheral ameloblastoma (PA) in gingiva is rare and often confused with oral basal cell carcinoma (OBCC). The tissues of one case of PA and one case of OBCC with the same mandibular molar area affected were compared via an immunohistochemical examination using 50 antisera. The PA and OBCC showed similar proliferation of basaloid epithelial strands, but toluidine blue staining revealed that the PA had pinkish juxta-epithelial myxoid tissue, whereas the OBCC was infiltrated by many mast cells. Immunohistochemical comparisons showed that the PA was strongly positive for ameloblastin, KL1, p63, carcinoembryonic antigen, focal adhesion kinase, and cathepsin K, and slightly positive for amelogenin, Krox-25, E-cadherin, and PTCH1, whereas the OBCC was not. On the other hand, the OBCC was strongly positive for EpCam, matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-1, α1-antitrypsin, cytokeratin-7, p53, survivin, pAKT1, transforming growth factor-β1, NRAS, TGase-1, and tumor nescrosis factor-α, and consistently positive for β-catenin, MMP-2, cathepsin G, TGase-2, SOS-1, sonic hedgehog, and the β-defensins-1, -2, -3, while the PA was not. These data suggest that the tumorigeneses of PA and OBCC differ, and that PAs undergo odontogenic differentiation and generate oncogenic signals for infiltrative growth and bone resorption, whereas OBCCs undergo basaloid epidermal differentiation as a result of growth factor/cytokine-related oncogenic signals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

外周成釉细胞瘤与口腔基底细胞癌在同一下颌磨牙区蛋白表达的差异。
摘要牙龈外周成釉细胞瘤(PA)非常罕见,常与口腔基底细胞癌(OBCC)混淆。采用50抗血清免疫组化方法,对1例PA和1例OBCC在同一下颌磨牙区受影响的组织进行比较。PA和OBCC显示相似的基底样上皮链增殖,但甲苯胺蓝染色显示PA有粉红色上皮旁黏液样组织,而OBCC则有许多肥大细胞浸润。免疫组化比较显示,PA对成釉细胞素、KL1、p63、癌胚抗原、局灶黏附激酶和组织蛋白酶K呈强阳性,对淀粉原蛋白、Krox-25、E-cadherin和PTCH1呈微阳性,而OBCC则没有。另一方面,OBCC对EpCam、基质金属蛋白酶(MMP)-1、α1-抗胰蛋白酶、细胞角蛋白-7、p53、survivin、pAKT1、转化生长因子-β1、NRAS、TGase-1、肿瘤坏死因子-α呈强阳性,对β-catenin、MMP-2、组织蛋白酶G、TGase-2、sod -1、sonic hedgehog、β-防御素-1、-2、-3呈强阳性,而PA则不呈强阳性。这些数据表明,PA和OBCC的致瘤性不同,并且PAs经过牙源性分化并产生浸润生长和骨吸收的致瘤信号,而OBCC则通过生长因子/细胞因子相关的致瘤信号进行基底细胞表皮分化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Pathology
Korean Journal of Pathology 医学-病理学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信